Simple enough question.
What's makes his circumstance sufficiently unique that it is in the best interests of justice for the president to unilaterally step in and subvert the system and legal process that convicted him?
He was denied a jury trial and the judge who ruled on the case was a known Arpaio enemy. Other than the fact that the trial was an obummer railroading worthy of the Soviet Union under Stalin, it was a fine trial.....
Moron.
Why the namecalling meltdown.
Your sayso about the trial is useless, btw. Got a reliable source?
Calling you a moron is a statement of fact. Not a meltdown, sweetie. Learn the difference.