Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
lol, I've gotten just about as many intelligent, substantive responses as I expected, aka Zero.
I see you troll with one liners same as camp when you cant counter pesky facts.
what facts? So far all I've been told is that Arpaio should be pardoned because he was convicted of contempt for not following an illegal order,
but not one person can show me where the order was ruled illegal.
lolol, maybe you can...
Do I sense a bit of...Simple enough question.
What's makes his circumstance sufficiently unique that it is in the best interests of justice for the president to unilaterally step in and subvert the system and legal process that convicted him?
Do I sense a bit of...Simple enough question.
What's makes his circumstance sufficiently unique that it is in the best interests of justice for the president to unilaterally step in and subvert the system and legal process that convicted him?
lol, I've gotten just about as many intelligent, substantive responses as I expected, aka Zero.
I see you troll with one liners same as camp when you cant counter pesky facts.
what facts? So far all I've been told is that Arpaio should be pardoned because he was convicted of contempt for not following an illegal order,
but not one person can show me where the order was ruled illegal.
lolol, maybe you can...
one liners in defeat just like I said before.congrats.poor crybaby troll.
Arpaio's conviction can still be appealed, so,
why pardon Arpaio? Why not let the justice system do its work, instead of having, as McGarrett calls him, the Fuhrer dictatorially intervene?
Because like every President before him, he can
He whines and crys about a president serving the people cleaning up our corrupt court system,yet where was his whining and bitching when Obama abused his power? nuff said,fucking hypocrite troll. 
No one here issued a pardon. Perhaps you should write a strongly worded letter to the person who has the answer rather than asking strangers on the internetDo I sense a bit of...Simple enough question.
What's makes his circumstance sufficiently unique that it is in the best interests of justice for the president to unilaterally step in and subvert the system and legal process that convicted him?
No. I'm asking people why do it and so far no one has a good answer.
No one here issued a pardon. Perhaps you should write a strongly worded letter to the person who has the answer rather than asking strangers on the internetDo I sense a bit of...Simple enough question.
What's makes his circumstance sufficiently unique that it is in the best interests of justice for the president to unilaterally step in and subvert the system and legal process that convicted him?
No. I'm asking people why do it and so far no one has a good answer.
Do I sense a bit of...Simple enough question.
What's makes his circumstance sufficiently unique that it is in the best interests of justice for the president to unilaterally step in and subvert the system and legal process that convicted him?
No. I'm asking people why do it and so far no one has a good answer.
Simple enough question.
What's makes his circumstance sufficiently unique that it is in the best interests of justice for the president to unilaterally step in and subvert the system and legal process that convicted him?
They believe he was upholding the law and apparently Trump agrees.No one here issued a pardon. Perhaps you should write a strongly worded letter to the person who has the answer rather than asking strangers on the internetDo I sense a bit of...Simple enough question.
What's makes his circumstance sufficiently unique that it is in the best interests of justice for the president to unilaterally step in and subvert the system and legal process that convicted him?
No. I'm asking people why do it and so far no one has a good answer.
I'd say the frantic irrational responses by the dozens from your RWnut pals proves you wrong.
Simple enough question.
What's makes his circumstance sufficiently unique that it is in the best interests of justice for the president to unilaterally step in and subvert the system and legal process that convicted him?
