jacksonlamb
Platinum Member
- Feb 3, 2026
- 7,918
- 3,864
- 893
No, it is not. Trump's plan was never consistent nor coherent, and, thus, ended miserably.That is a knee jerk assumption by a rogue editor.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, it is not. Trump's plan was never consistent nor coherent, and, thus, ended miserably.That is a knee jerk assumption by a rogue editor.
It's a bad deal, but the best someone like a Trump could make.It is not a bad deal.
In fact, after the first weeks of the war on Iran, it would have been nearly impossible to make a "bad deal." Not unless another Obiden took the White House and started sending pallets of cash again.
The new generation of Mullahs is painfully aware of what happened to the previous generation of Mullahs. If there is a New Iranian Navy, some of the boats will have glass bottoms so they can see the Old Iranian Navy. The purported leader is very literally made out of cardboard and his speeches are performed by a voice actor, leaving the fractured Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corp as the armed might of the phantom Mullah government.
All that said, the Dems may finally be right about Iran not trying to build a nuclear weapon.
That is goofy, to say the nicest thing that can be said.I'm saying they are treading thin ice. At this rate Reza Pahlavi will be utilizing it, not the the current leadership.
It is an intricate setup of the Iranian leadership. And they are currently falling for it.
Not to brag, but I'm actually paying attention to this. Some plans are intentionally designed to fail. This is one of them.No, it is not. Trump's plan was never consistent nor coherent, and, thus, ended miserably.
Think what you like.That is goofy, to say the nicest thing that can be said.
Do the same.Think what you like.
Indeed.Do the same.
it's strait and that's because it isn't straight.I already know what will happen. The straight will open, and not much else, until the November election.
After that, Trump will decide whether to re-escalate.
When Japan and Germany surrendered, as the Ayatollah did for Trump, both had citizens saying they got a bad deal.It's a bad deal, but the best someone like a Trump could make.
We didn't win nuffin.Written by someone with TDS no doubt. No concept of reality.
Do you comprehend English at all?
And MOU is NOT A ******* DEAL. It is just an understanding between two nations that will THEN sit down and hash out a deal.
Trump is giving $325 Billion to support Iranian terrorismYour mullocrats need the money.
You have been binge watching the hags on The View, again.Trump is giving $325 Billion to support Iranian terrorism
Explain?It's a bad deal, but the best someone like a Trump could make.
Prove me wrong SweetieYou have been binge watching the hags on The View, again.
I also see that many of you are more concerned about the mid-terms than about the possibility of peace in the Middle East.I see the MOU with Iran as a step towards peace in the Middle East and stability for world energy supplies. Why do any of you see it as a "bad deal" for the US? Please be specific and indicate what alternatives you now support.
Everyone is, Cassandro Clown.I also see that many of you are more concerned about the mid-terms than about the possibility of peace in the Middle East.
seeing Trump's incredible success at getting people to vote for candidates he endorses, I'm not real worried about algae in the pool or whatever this thread is about.I also see that many of you are more concerned about the mid-terms than about the possibility of peace in the Middle East.