Why is the Left obsessed with forcing the Right to believe the Election wasn’t Stolen?

theHawk

Registered Conservative
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
34,329
Reaction score
21,523
Points
1,905
Location
Arizona
Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?





  • Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
  • “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
  • Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
  • Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
  • Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
  • Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
  • The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;
 

Votto

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
28,521
Reaction score
12,499
Points
1,090
Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?





  • Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
  • “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
  • Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
  • Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
  • Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
  • Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
  • The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;
I would think the Left wants their opponents to think elections are not fair, that way they will tend not to bother to vote.

And in the interim, you may get stories of angry protesters the press can mock and demonize and marginalize which is a bonus.

It's all a bit of fun really
 

Mac1958

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
82,314
Reaction score
26,567
Points
2,280
Location
Opposing Authoritarian Ideological Fundamentalism.
Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?





  • Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
  • “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
  • Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
  • Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
  • Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
  • Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
  • The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;
You're not required to agree.

You can believe whatever you're told in your universe.

We do, however, have the right to think you've been conned.
 
OP
theHawk

theHawk

Registered Conservative
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
34,329
Reaction score
21,523
Points
1,905
Location
Arizona
Reality is nice.
Reality is nice. The election was stolen. Pretty sad that the left had to use 24/7 365 days a year for four years of anti-Trump propaganda, and still had to resort to cheating on election night to dump hundreds of thousands of votes in key districts to “win”.
 

Leo123

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2017
Messages
12,140
Reaction score
5,702
Points
400
Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?





  • Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
  • “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
  • Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
  • Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
  • Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
  • Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
  • The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;
Good read, thanks.
 

Leo123

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2017
Messages
12,140
Reaction score
5,702
Points
400
Why is the Left obsessed with forcing the Right to believe the Election wasn’t Stolen?-The Hawk

Because we live in a society.
Apparently the left believes everyone should live in their society.
 

Votto

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
28,521
Reaction score
12,499
Points
1,090
Why is the Left obsessed with forcing the Right to believe the Election wasn’t Stolen?-The Hawk

Because we live in a society.
Apparently the left believes everyone should live in their society.
Actually, about 30% of those on the Left thinks it was stolen as well.

LOL.

But they are all OK with it.
 

B. Kidd

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
27,815
Reaction score
10,526
Points
900
Location
Western Lands
Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?





  • Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
  • “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
  • Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
  • Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
  • Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
  • Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
  • The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;
Only because their guy was installed at a pivotal point in our history!
 
OP
theHawk

theHawk

Registered Conservative
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
34,329
Reaction score
21,523
Points
1,905
Location
Arizona
You can always tell when an election is stolen. When the numbers just don’t add up. How does President Trump get +10% of the black vote over his already good 2016 numbers all over the country, yet somehow Biden gets 120% of the black vote in just a few cities, the cities where the vote was stopped and ballots shipped in with no oversight?

BA127F5D-4B64-4D60-A3B0-4A20EB40BC7F.jpeg
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top