.
During election night, November 4, 2020, CNN reported Georgia's Fulton County still has 20,000 mail-in ballots left to count:
The shocking truth is, not one of these 20,000 mailed in ballots which had been introduced into the system, was scrutinized when counted, to verify if these ballots were actually filled out, and the choices made thereon, were by the qualified voter who allegedly was issued each ballot. There is no process in Fulton County, or Georgia for that matter, to confirm who actually makes the choices on a mailed-in ballot.
Currently, there are only 12 states that make an attempt, and I emphasize “attempt”, to verify a voter of a mailed-in ballot is the qualified voter of that ballot, and actually filled out that ballot and made the choices thereon. Those States are, Alabama, Alaska, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Virginia, and Wisconsin. Georgia is not on that list.
Now see: Georgia voting irregularities: The curious case of Biden’s 20,000-vote surge...
From the above information is appears to be an undeniable fact that mail-in ballots are not as secured from vote stealing, and especially not from government perpetrated election fraud, as are ballots which are cast in person with proper identification requirements.
Any State Election Officer having access to various in-state data bases containing personal catalogued information on state residents i.e., driver’s license, voter rolls, tax returns, etc., can easily create a few thousand fraudulent mail-in ballots, per urban voting district using that information, with a slim to no chance of these ballots ever being detected when counted. And in many cases a few thousand votes swings a Congressional seat election. Keep in mind, in considering the above, it’s as easy as pie for government perpetrated election fraud when a state turns to no-excuse mail-in voting!
So, the question is, while many other countries are banning mail-in voting [SOURCE], and there is an obvious and glaring inability to verify the legitimacy of each mailed-in ballot, why is universal no-excuse mail-in voting suddenly the crave of the United States and being promoted by a number of suspicious political groups? And why is it that the allowance for no-excuse mail in voting is suddenly being forced upon the people of a number of Democrat controlled states [New York, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts] without the peoples’ approval and consent via a constitutional amendment authorizing no-excuse mail-in voting?
There certainly appears to be something very suspicious afoot with America’s election process, and if it is not sorted out before the 2024 election, no-excuse mail-in voting may very well usher in, in the United States, the kinds of elections found in Russia, China and Cuba, where there is one party authoritarian rule.
JWK
The troubling truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.
During election night, November 4, 2020, CNN reported Georgia's Fulton County still has 20,000 mail-in ballots left to count:
The shocking truth is, not one of these 20,000 mailed in ballots which had been introduced into the system, was scrutinized when counted, to verify if these ballots were actually filled out, and the choices made thereon, were by the qualified voter who allegedly was issued each ballot. There is no process in Fulton County, or Georgia for that matter, to confirm who actually makes the choices on a mailed-in ballot.
Currently, there are only 12 states that make an attempt, and I emphasize “attempt”, to verify a voter of a mailed-in ballot is the qualified voter of that ballot, and actually filled out that ballot and made the choices thereon. Those States are, Alabama, Alaska, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Virginia, and Wisconsin. Georgia is not on that list.
Now see: Georgia voting irregularities: The curious case of Biden’s 20,000-vote surge...
From the above information is appears to be an undeniable fact that mail-in ballots are not as secured from vote stealing, and especially not from government perpetrated election fraud, as are ballots which are cast in person with proper identification requirements.
Any State Election Officer having access to various in-state data bases containing personal catalogued information on state residents i.e., driver’s license, voter rolls, tax returns, etc., can easily create a few thousand fraudulent mail-in ballots, per urban voting district using that information, with a slim to no chance of these ballots ever being detected when counted. And in many cases a few thousand votes swings a Congressional seat election. Keep in mind, in considering the above, it’s as easy as pie for government perpetrated election fraud when a state turns to no-excuse mail-in voting!
So, the question is, while many other countries are banning mail-in voting [SOURCE], and there is an obvious and glaring inability to verify the legitimacy of each mailed-in ballot, why is universal no-excuse mail-in voting suddenly the crave of the United States and being promoted by a number of suspicious political groups? And why is it that the allowance for no-excuse mail in voting is suddenly being forced upon the people of a number of Democrat controlled states [New York, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts] without the peoples’ approval and consent via a constitutional amendment authorizing no-excuse mail-in voting?
There certainly appears to be something very suspicious afoot with America’s election process, and if it is not sorted out before the 2024 election, no-excuse mail-in voting may very well usher in, in the United States, the kinds of elections found in Russia, China and Cuba, where there is one party authoritarian rule.
JWK
The troubling truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.
