Why is the Left obsessed with forcing the Right to believe the Election wasn’t Stolen?

[d0gbreath]

"The left" is a little too broad of a brush. I don't care what the people on the right think and am morely likely to say "Fine, we stole it, now eat it".

 

[Leo123]

"The left" is a little too broad of a brush. I don't care what the people on the right think and am morely likely to say "Fine, we stole it, now eat it".

Same 'brush' different 'painter' I guess.

 

[Faun]

Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…

amgreatness.com

• Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
• “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
• Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
• Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
• Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
• Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
• The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;

Because you're undermining the election process which is a cornerstone of our freedom.

 

[theHawk]

Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…

amgreatness.com

• Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
• “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
• Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
• Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
• Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
• Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
• The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;

Because you're undermining the election process which is a cornerstone of our freedom.

How is demanding election integrity “undermining” the election process?

Once again you Marxist fags accuse us of what you are doing. You cheat in elections and subvert our Republic by refusing to allow audits, or to pass voter ID laws.

 

[Lastamender]

Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…

amgreatness.com

• Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
• “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
• Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
• Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
• Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
• Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
• The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;

Because you're undermining the election process which is a cornerstone of our freedom.

You have done that by stealing an election and doing everything to cover it up, including censorship, intimidation, and violence.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Why is the Left obsessed with forcing the Right to believe the Election wasn’t Stolen?-The Hawk

Because we live in a society.

Ah, so by the same token, you would have felt it perfectly okay if, during the Trump administration, we had demanded that you had to believe and parrot our narrative on issues, no arguments or dissent allowed?

 

[XponentialChaos]

Forcing? Nobody is forcing you to do anything.

Both sides simply express their opinions. What a crazy concept.

 

[theHawk]

Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…

amgreatness.com

• Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
• “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
• Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
• Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
• Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
• Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
• The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;

Because you're undermining the election process which is a cornerstone of our freedom.

You have done that by stealing an election and doing everything to cover it up, including censorship, intimidation, and violence.

Good point. They have to censor, silence, and cancel anyone that doesn’t agree with their lies.

The sure sign of a “democracy”, eh?

 

[theHawk]

Forcing? Nobody is forcing you to do anything.

Both sides simply express their opinions. What a crazy concept.

Really? When why are leftwingers enforcing it on social media? People are censored and banned for having certain opinions everyday since the election.

Reality doesn’t support your assertion that they aren’t trying to force others into dropping the subject.

 

[dblack]

Because consent of the governed is necessary for stable society. If half the nation refuses to accept the legitimacy of our government, we're kind a fucked.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Really? When why are leftwingers enforcing it on social media? People are censored and banned for having certain opinions everyday since the election.

Reality doesn’t support your assertion that they aren’t trying to force others into dropping the subject.

A business can conduct itself as it chooses as long as its actions are within the framework of the law.

You're free to choose to use that service or not.

 

[surada]

Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…

amgreatness.com

• Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
• “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
• Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
• Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
• Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
• Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
• The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;

Because you're undermining the election process which is a cornerstone of our freedom.

How is demanding election integrity “undermining” the election process?

Once again you Marxist fags accuse us of what you are doing. You cheat in elections and subvert our Republic by refusing to allow audits, or to pass voter ID laws.

All you have is Trump lies.. He got $224 million and 3months to prove fraud. This is like his claim that3-5 million illegals voted in 2016 and his investigators in Hawaii could prove Obama wasn't born there.

Why would you coddle such a disgusting liar?

 

[Larsky]

Biden won. FACT.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…

amgreatness.com

• Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
• “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
• Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
• Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
• Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
• Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
• The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;

This fails as a strawman fallacy.

 

[toobfreak]

Good read, because it’s very true.

Just SAY IT, HAWK. SAY IT. Say Biden is the legit president and the election was totally fair! Quit perpetuating those CONSPIRACY THEORIES and BASELESS LIES that there was ANYTHING wrong with the election otherwise, you run the risk of starting dissent in the USA as a Trump Supporting Anarchist!

You might start a riot.

Or maybe you might start some legit questions finally into a very troubling affair.

The best part was where the author says "Sullivan badgered me on this at length before finally accusing me of being fixated on the topic!

JUST SAY IT!

BIDEN WON NOTHING. AMERICA HAS BEEN CHEATED.

 

[toobfreak]

Biden won. FACT.

My dick's 12 inches. Fact.

 

[theHawk]

Really? When why are leftwingers enforcing it on social media? People are censored and banned for having certain opinions everyday since the election.

Reality doesn’t support your assertion that they aren’t trying to force others into dropping the subject.

A business can conduct itself as it chooses as long as its actions are within the framework of the law.

You're free to choose to use that service or not.

You’re a great defender of corporate fascism.

Funny how you went from “Nobody is forcing you” to “it’s perfectly legal”.

 

[BlindBoo]

Because the Rabid Right so willing to use violence to force their lie upon the rest of us. I'd rather convince you that you've been conned, than have to kill you or lock you up, because you want to overthrow the duly elected government of the people.

 

[Seawytch]

Forcing? Nobody is forcing you to do anything.

Both sides simply express their opinions. What a crazy concept.

Really? When why are leftwingers enforcing it on social media? People are censored and banned for having certain opinions everyday since the election.

Reality doesn’t support your assertion that they aren’t trying to force others into dropping the subject.

They aren’t being banned for “certain opinions”, they are being banned for telling lies. If you have a factual issue and you have a different way of addressing that issue that is a difference of opinion. If you believe something that is untrue there isn’t anything to have an opinion on.

 

[toobfreak]

Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?

Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?

Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…

amgreatness.com

• Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
• “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
• Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
• Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
• Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
• Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
• The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;

This fails as a strawman fallacy.

How?