Why Evolution is a Fairytale for Grown-Ups

More naysaying garbage?

You just don't get it.

There's no such thing as "non-life".

There's no such thing as "nothing" either.

Please, try to get a clue. And stop posting bullshit from people who have no idea what they're talking about.
I have no clue who you said that to.
 
More naysaying garbage?

You just don't get it.

There's no such thing as "non-life".

There's no such thing as "nothing" either.

Please, try to get a clue. And stop posting bullshit from people who have no idea what they're talking about.
I have no clue who you said that to.
 
First of all, evolution is not an accident. There are many theories of how life began that conform to natural laws as we know them. If God created life, how did he do it? Saying he breathed life into dust (Genesis 2:7) is not an answer. What creationists are saying essentially is that they don't know how life was created but they know how it wasn't created. Doesn't pass the sniff test.
You appear to have a few ideas of your own. What would they be?
 
I post videos by experts so you don't have to waste your time trying to pin me down. While I have studied it for a long time, the sources are from different vantages. I planned to discuss the video. But so far I don't see any about the video, but about me. Your dog breeding does not start out with what originally created the first dog. Can you tell me what was existing that became a dog. Do you see present dogs evolving say into other animals?
Bob, these 'experts' are homers for their side, nothing more.

You keep attack people, you will get it in return. Now calm down, take a nap, and then start again.
 
I post videos by experts so you don't have to waste your time trying to pin me down. While I have studied it for a long time, the sources are from different vantages. I planned to discuss the video. But so far I don't see any about the video, but about me.

My question is whether you understand the statistical artistry inherit in any of the abiogenesis theories ... why bother with the errors in the video if you won't discuss them ... you posted a fighting thread title ... and now you run away ...

Your dog breeding does not start out with what originally created the first dog. Can you tell me what was existing that became a dog. Do you see present dogs evolving say into other animals?

By asking this ... then ... you agree with our assumption: "Once is enough" ... there's an abundance of literature on the internet about canine evolution ... you've read it ... why are you asking me to repeat it here? ... one theory is dogs are the wolves too stupid to run away from humans ... and thus a new taxon ... does a new taxon qualify as a new animal? ...

I'm not going to waste 24 minutes of my time with prophetic garbage ... I've never said evolution was right, all I'm claiming is evolution is useful ... read the Bible if you want right and wrong ...
 
Bob, these 'experts' are homers for their side, nothing more.

You keep attack people, you will get it in return. Now calm down, take a nap, and then start again.
What attack? What side do you mean?
 
My question is whether you understand the statistical artistry inherit in any of the abiogenesis theories ... why bother with the errors in the video if you won't discuss them ... you posted a fighting thread title ... and now you run away ...
I see now why you misunderstood. First the title of the post is just the title of the video. I have posted other posts about abiogenesis. This one was interesting. I am happy to discuss perceived errors in the video. I just want it to be about the video. Discuss away....
 
My question is whether you understand the statistical artistry inherit in any of the abiogenesis theories ... why bother with the errors in the video if you won't discuss them ... you posted a fighting thread title ... and now you run away ...



By asking this ... then ... you agree with our assumption: "Once is enough" ... there's an abundance of literature on the internet about canine evolution ... you've read it ... why are you asking me to repeat it here? ... one theory is dogs are the wolves too stupid to run away from humans ... and thus a new taxon ... does a new taxon qualify as a new animal? ...

I'm not going to waste 24 minutes of my time with prophetic garbage ... I've never said evolution was right, all I'm claiming is evolution is useful ... read the Bible if you want right and wrong ...
I believe that dogs are actually wolves. With usually a better temperment.
 
I see now why you misunderstood. First the title of the post is just the title of the video. I have posted other posts about abiogenesis. This one was interesting. I am happy to discuss perceived errors in the video. I just want it to be about the video. Discuss away....

So you don't understand ... if you don't understand what the video is about, how can you intelligently discuss it? ... the video is about pseudo-science ... it shouldn't be posted in this forum ... next time try "Religion" of better ... [snicker] ... "Conspiracy Theories" ...

You don't understand ToE ... so it must be wrong ... man, I'd hate to be you ...
 
So you're promoting that there is an intelligent design as true!!! I tend to agree.
Promoting? No. I only asked, if you think God did it, how did he do it?

Nobody can return to the beginning and know for a fact. If you think God did not do it, try this out. Life forms don't exist. Or try this out. Earth has a known number of elements. The elements decided to create life. And we know it because life is created as new forms every day of the year. What is your choice?
C. None of the above.

Elements make no decisions, nor do they have any goals. What they are is subject to natural laws. Dissolve trillions of ions of sodium and chlorine in water and they bounce around in random (Brownian) motion. Let the water evaporate and the ions will self-assemble into regular (as in non-random) crystals. No designer required. Snowflakes are similar. Once elements and molecules self-assembled into objects that could grow and divide, they became subject to the laws of evolution and eventually into things we know as life.
 
Promoting? No. I only asked, if you think God did it, how did he do it?


C. None of the above.

Elements make no decisions, nor do they have any goals. What they are is subject to natural laws. Dissolve trillions of ions of sodium and chlorine in water and they bounce around in random (Brownian) motion. Let the water evaporate and the ions will self-assemble into regular (as in non-random) crystals. No designer required. Snowflakes are similar. Once elements and molecules self-assembled into objects that could grow and divide, they became subject to the laws of evolution and eventually into things we know as life.

... and we know the structure of the genetic material and exactly where an ionizing photon hits to cause evolutionary change ... to the very atoms and monomers involved ... ToE is chemistry anymore ...
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom