Why Evolution is a Fairytale for Grown-Ups

[Robert W]

You get to walk slowly through this scientists discussions where his aim is to prove evolution is an adult fairy tale.

Be careful since he just may persuade you that evolution as taught is an adult fairy tale.

 

[skews13]

You get to walk slowly through this scientists discussions where his aim is to prove evolution is an adult fairy tale.

Be careful since he just may persuade you that evolution as taught is an adult fairy tale.

This is what psychosis looks like.

 

[alang1216]

You get to walk slowly through this scientists discussions where his aim is to prove evolution is an adult fairy tale.

Be careful since he just may persuade you that evolution as taught is an adult fairy tale.

And the evidence for creationism is better? I doubt it.

Arthur C. Clark had a great quote: If a elderly scientist tells you something is impossible he is probably wrong, if a young scientist tells you something is possible he is probably right. (or words to that effect)

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You are a Joseph Fielding Smith Mormon. No wonder you believe your nonsense.

 

[ReinyDays]

You get to walk slowly through this scientists discussions where his aim is to prove evolution is an adult fairy tale.

Be careful since he just may persuade you that evolution as taught is an adult fairy tale.

Why do you think dog breeding is based on fairy tales? ... that's so odd ...

Which part of the chemistry do you think is in error? ... mate a Lab to another Lab, you'll get Lab puppies ... honest ... try it yourself ...

 

[Robert W]

And the evidence for creationism is better? I doubt it.

Arthur C. Clark had a great quote: If a elderly scientist tells you something is impossible he is probably wrong, if a young scientist tells you something is possible he is probably right. (or words to that effect)

I approach it somewhat differently. How is it possible to take any group of elements, cleverly combine them into life and say it is merely an accident?

 

[Robert W]

Why do you think dog breeding is based on fairy tales? ... that's so odd ...

Which part of the chemistry do you think is in error? ... mate a Lab to another Lab, you'll get Lab puppies ... honest ... try it yourself ...

Who are you chatting with?

 

[Robert W]

You are a Joseph Fielding Smith Mormon. No wonder you believe your nonsense.

Am I??? I have no clue what you mean? What nonsense? Do you mean the video author?

 

[ReinyDays]

Who are you chatting with?

You ... why do you think dog breeding is based on fairy tales? ... which fairy are we talking about? ...

No answer beyond what YouTube tells you ... okay, I understand ...

 

[Quasar44]

You get to walk slowly through this scientists discussions where his aim is to prove evolution is an adult fairy tale.

Be careful since he just may persuade you that evolution as taught is an adult fairy tale.

I like you but evolution is as factual as the laws of EM , gravity and relativity

 

[Robert W]

You ... why do you think dog breeding is based on fairy tales? ... which fairy are we talking about? ...

No answer beyond what YouTube tells you ... okay, I understand ...

I just finished the PHd's discussion as when I posted his, I had only been listening for 10 minutes. So now I understand what he says much better. You are querying me for what others said. Did you also watch the video? He did not discuss dog breeding.

His and my concern is trust. If one thinks he or she has knowledge, by self examination or talks by others? He says evolution but spends the bulk of his time dismissing current abiogenesis. And his version of evolution is it is a myth. As to what the stories told about it amount to.

 

[Robert W]

I like you but evolution is as factual as the laws of EM , gravity and relativity

So, can evolution explain abiogenesis? Can you explain gravity or relativity?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I approach it somewhat differently. How is it possible to take any group of elements, cleverly combine them into life and say it is merely an accident?

You do, yes. You approach it insanely.

 

[alang1216]

I approach it somewhat differently. How is it possible to take any group of elements, cleverly combine them into life and say it is merely an accident?

First of all, evolution is not an accident. There are many theories of how life began that conform to natural laws as we know them. If God created life, how did he do it? Saying he breathed life into dust (Genesis 2:7) is not an answer. What creationists are saying essentially is that they don't know how life was created but they know how it wasn't created. Doesn't pass the sniff test.

 

[fncceo]

evolution is an adult fairy tale.

And yet, so many adults demonstrate daily just how right Darwin was.

 

[ReinyDays]

He did not discuss dog breeding.

Why would he discuss a major counter-example to his reasoning? ...

His and my concern is trust. If one thinks he or she has knowledge, by self examination or talks by others? He says evolution but spends the bulk of his time dismissing current abiogenesis. And his version of evolution is it is a myth. As to what the stories told about it amount to.

Why did you post the video if you don't want to discuss it? ... can you at least save me the 24 minutes and tell us what part of the statistics of abiogenesis is in error ... our assumption is "once is enough" ... if so, then life readily follows where liquid water exists, all other building blocks of life as we know it already exist in abundance ...

Trust is philosophical ... science is about observation, ToE is what we see ... as fully demonstrated by dog breeding ... sounds like your complaint is about the sophisticated trickery with the statistical arts that's used to explain how we got to cellular life ... is it the creative arts you don't trust? ... personally I thought it was trick ... God Bless enzymes ...

Scientific theory is written in pencil ... don't treat it like it's carved in granite ... we can and regular do erase parts and fill in with new information ... it's not religion ... it's statistics !!! ...

 

[scruffy]

More naysaying garbage?

You just don't get it.

There's no such thing as "non-life".

There's no such thing as "nothing" either.

Please, try to get a clue. And stop posting bullshit from people who have no idea what they're talking about.

 

[Robert W]

Why would he discuss a major counter-example to his reasoning? ...



Why did you post the video if you don't want to discuss it? ... can you at least save me the 24 minutes and tell us what part of the statistics of abiogenesis is in error ... our assumption is "once is enough" ... if so, then life readily follows where liquid water exists, all other building blocks of life as we know it already exist in abundance ...

Trust is philosophical ... science is about observation, ToE is what we see ... as fully demonstrated by dog breeding ... sounds like your complaint is about the sophisticated trickery with the statistical arts that's used to explain how we got to cellular life ... is it the creative arts you don't trust? ... personally I thought it was trick ... God Bless enzymes ...

Scientific theory is written in pencil ... don't treat it like it's carved in granite ... we can and regular do erase parts and fill in with new information ... it's not religion ... it's statistics !!! ...

I post videos by experts so you don't have to waste your time trying to pin me down. While I have studied it for a long time, the sources are from different vantages. I planned to discuss the video. But so far I don't see any about the video, but about me. Your dog breeding does not start out with what originally created the first dog. Can you tell me what was existing that became a dog. Do you see present dogs evolving say into other animals?

 

[Robert W]

And yet, so many adults demonstrate daily just how right Darwin was.

Maybe they evolved from Cockroaches!!

 

[Robert W]

First of all, evolution is not an accident. There are many theories of how life began that conform to natural laws as we know them. If God created life, how did he do it? Saying he breathed life into dust (Genesis 2:7) is not an answer. What creationists are saying essentially is that they don't know how life was created but they know how it wasn't created. Doesn't pass the sniff test.

So you're promoting that there is an intelligent design as true!!! I tend to agree.
Nobody can return to the beginning and know for a fact. If you think God did not do it, try this out. Life forms don't exist. Or try this out. Earth has a known number of elements. The elements decided to create life. And we know it because life is created as new forms every day of the year. What is your choice?