Why Evolution is a Fairytale for Grown-Ups

[Woodznutz]

Nothing is finished.

Everything is constantly evolving.

We're an experiment in progress.

We are evolving morally, physically not so much.

 

[Robert W]

Geologically speaking, photos have not been around a long time. If you ring my doorbell should it matter to me if you walked or drove, took Maple Ave. or Oak St., etc.? I can't prove you didn't teleport to my door but that seems unlikely.

I expected that. See a hunk of problems for Evolution is showing it exists. Surely there has to be some proof one can take photos of. This is why this field has problems.

 

[progressive hunter]

Sorry, but you're wrong.

The difference is only where the mutation occurs.

It's too bad you're so ignorant. I hope you're not home schooling your kids.

breeding isnt mutation,,

sorry youre so ignorant,, I hope youre not home schooling your children,,

 

[alang1216]

Logic dictates supernatural creation. Seeing that evolution is impossible special creation is the only logical choice.

Why is evolution impossible? Even if there were zero evidence for, it isn't impossible. If you believe in special creation, you believe nothing is impossible.

 

[progressive hunter]

Why is evolution impossible? Even if there were zero evidence for, it isn't impossible. If you believe in special creation, you believe nothing is impossible.

deflecting to creation isnt going to make evolution true,,

in fact it shows you know youre wrong

 

[alang1216]

I expected that. See a hunk of problems for Evolution is showing it exists. Surely there has to be some proof one can take photos of. This is why this field has problems.

Even for a strawman argument, that is weak. We don't have any photos of Mount Everest going from below sea level to the top of the world, yet it did. Or do you believe it was created as it is 6,000 years ago?

 

[progressive hunter]

Even for a strawman argument, that is weak. We don't have any photos of Mount Everest going from below sea level to the top of the world, yet it did. Or do you believe it was created as it is 6,000 years ago?

youre proving evolution cant stand on its own merits when you use creation as a deflection

 

[alang1216]

We are evolving morally, physically not so much.

I hope you're right about our morality but I think you're wrong about our physical evolution. I seem to recall there are people who live high up in the Andes that have extra hemoglobin in their blood to compensate for the lack of oxygen. Also there are people that gather their food from the ocean and can hold their breath for a very long time due to some physiological changes.

 

[alang1216]

youre proving evolution cant stand on its own merits when you use creation as a deflection

I'm saying there is no viable alternate theory and anyone who says there is, is ignorant or prejudiced. I don't recall you offering one. Or are you saying you don't know how we came to be but you do know how we didn't come to be?

 

[progressive hunter]

I'm saying there is no viable alternate theory and anyone who says there is, is ignorant or prejudiced. I don't recall you offering one. Or are you saying you don't know how we came to be but you do know how we didn't come to be?

lack of an alternative doesnt men evolution is true and you deflecting to creation shows you dont even believe it,,

 

[Robert W]

Even for a strawman argument, that is weak. We don't have any photos of Mount Everest going from below sea level to the top of the world, yet it did. Or do you believe it was created as it is 6,000 years ago?

You have never read me saying it was created 6000 years ago. What you do find out is I am difficult to fool. Evolutionists simply would help themselves when the day comes they prove that their idea of science needs proof as Democrats claim the world is on the path to destruction caused of all things by weather.

We find too many non science humans easy to fool on those particular issues.
Science once told us that fire was caused by what they called Phlogiston and devoted followers fought like hell if one told them how fire really works.
Theory mentioned.
"
AI Overview
Learn more

The phlogiston theory was an early explanation of fire and combustion that was widely accepted in the 17th and 18th centuries. It proposed that combustible substances contained a fire-like substance called phlogiston, which was released during burning. This theory was later replaced by the modern understanding of combustion involving oxygen.

Here's a more detailed look at the phlogiston theory:

What it was:

• Phlogiston was proposed as a substance that was contained within combustible materials.
• When something burned, it was believed that phlogiston was released.

 

[Robert W]

Great books I'm sure but abiogenesis is not evolution so I'm not sure what your point is. Did abiogenesis create every species on Earth directly?

It is fundamental to understanding science of this topic by understanding the beginning. Schopf declared with proof that life started as cyanobacteria. Your ancestors he says are bacteria. How do you factor that in your theory?

Let me present you with a huge problem for evolution.

Let's discuss the very first human.
Did that human have a heart? A brain? Kidneys, bowels and muscles?

Try explaining the magic of not having those but being the first human?
Then the chicken and egg problem.
Science argues over what happened first. The chicken laying eggs or eggs being the basis of the first chicken. Your concept contains tons of things you won't be able to explain.

 

[Robert W]

Geologically speaking, photos have not been around a long time. If you ring my doorbell should it matter to me if you walked or drove, took Maple Ave. or Oak St., etc.? I can't prove you didn't teleport to my door but that seems unlikely.

Many problems believing in Evolution. I posted what was the first human that is proven to have existed? Can you explain why a first human would evolve to not having a brain or heart or lungs and how later humans acquired those in a body?

Problem. First humans would not have those organs. Evolution says later as the body somehow decided to need the brain, it showed up. Magic isn't it?

See if the first human did have brains, hearts and lungs and bones and kidneys and bladders, a good explanation is an unknown force created that at the same time and here we are.

 

[alang1216]

lack of an alternative doesnt men evolution is true and you deflecting to creation shows you dont even believe it,,

Sherlock Holmes famously stated, "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." This quote, a core principle of Holmes' deductive reasoning, appears in multiple Sherlock Holmes stories.
In essence, Holmes' philosophy suggests that by rigorously eliminating all possibilities that contradict known facts, the remaining possibility, even if seemingly unlikely, is the most likely explanation.

 

[Robert W]

Sherlock Holmes famously stated, "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." This quote, a core principle of Holmes' deductive reasoning, appears in multiple Sherlock Holmes stories.
In essence, Holmes' philosophy suggests that by rigorously eliminating all possibilities that contradict known facts, the remaining possibility, even if seemingly unlikely, is the most likely explanation.

AI Overview
Learn more

No, Sherlock Holmes was a fictional character created by author Arthur Conan Doyle. However, Doyle did draw inspiration from a real-life figure, Dr. Joseph Bell, a surgeon and lecturer at the University of Edinburgh, who Doyle admired for his observational and deductive skills.

 

[alang1216]

You have never read me saying it was created 6000 years ago. What you do find out is I am difficult to fool.

If you have to state that...

Evolutionists simply would help themselves when the day comes they prove that their idea of science needs proof as Democrats claim the world is on the path to destruction caused of all things by weather.

The world is not on the path to destruction, just humanity, but that is off-topic.

We find too many non science humans easy to fool on those particular issues.
Science once told us that fire was caused by what they called Phlogiston and devoted followers fought like hell if one told them how fire really works.

To my knowledge, science is the only human endeavor, that is self correcting, and is continuously getting closer to the truth.

 

[alang1216]

It is fundamental to understanding science of this topic by understanding the beginning. Schopf declared with proof that life started as cyanobacteria. Your ancestors he says are bacteria. How do you factor that in your theory?

I don't. Bacteria are still complex life forms that took hundreds of millions of years to evolve. He may be right that they are my ancestors but then I have lots of ancestors.

Let me present you with a huge problem for evolution.

Let's discuss the very first human.
Did that human have a heart? A brain? Kidneys, bowels and muscles?

Try explaining the magic of not having those but being the first human?
Then the chicken and egg problem.
Science argues over what happened first. The chicken laying eggs or eggs being the basis of the first chicken. Your concept contains tons of things you won't be able to explain.

The fact that you feel this are valid questions merely demonstrate your ignorance of evolution. None are real problems.

 

[alang1216]

Many problems believing in Evolution. I posted what was the first human that is proven to have existed? Can you explain why a first human would evolve to not having a brain or heart or lungs and how later humans acquired those in a body?

Problem. First humans would not have those organs. Evolution says later as the body somehow decided to need the brain, it showed up. Magic isn't it?

See if the first human did have brains, hearts and lungs and bones and kidneys and bladders, a good explanation is an unknown force created that at the same time and here we are.

You may not be as hard to fool as you think. Humans evolved from non-human apes. Like all apes today, those apes had a brain, heart, lungs, etc.

 

[Robert W]

You may not be as hard to fool as you think. Humans evolved from non-human apes. Like all apes today, those apes had a brain, heart, lungs, etc.

Why do you simply accept that?

What happened to you is you shifted the questions about humans to the same questions about apes.

 

[Robert W]

You may not be as hard to fool as you think. Humans evolved from non-human apes. Like all apes today, those apes had a brain, heart, lungs, etc.

Surely there are apes proving your theory. Where are apes forming into humans?
Maybe you have photographs.