Why Evolution is a Fairytale for Grown-Ups

The world is not on the path to destruction, just humanity, but that is off-topic.
OK, be funny. You understood I was talking only of humans. So humans are not any part of the topic?
 
I don't. Bacteria are still complex life forms that took hundreds of millions of years to evolve. He may be right that they are my ancestors but then I have lots of ancestors.


The fact that you feel this are valid questions merely demonstrate your ignorance of evolution. None are real problems.
Frankly you are acting on this forum as our superior person on the topic of Evolution. But you are stumped. I have a university book on evolution. I have maybe a dozen books on this topic for laypersons.

Here is your problem. This planet, early on was lifeless. Dr. Schopf I quote from believes he discovered first life. Not earlier than life, but first life. Do you understand that Darwin said in his book he is confused? But you say you are not confused by his book!!!
 
Surely there are apes proving your theory. Where are apes forming into humans?
Maybe you have photographs.
I'm sure any photos you have that were taken in East Africa, 4-6 million years ago will settle the question.
 
Frankly you are acting on this forum as our superior person on the topic of Evolution. But you are stumped. I have a university book on evolution. I have maybe a dozen books on this topic for laypersons.

Here is your problem. This planet, early on was lifeless. Dr. Schopf I quote from believes he discovered first life. Not earlier than life, but first life.
Early life? Yes. First life? No.

Do you understand that Darwin said in his book he is confused? But you say you are not confused by his book!!!
Darwin live over 100 years ago. We know more now.
 
I'm sure any photos you have that were taken in East Africa, 4-6 million years ago will settle the question.
So evolution is too slow to be detected yet you think you detected it 4-6 millions of years ago? Correct? IF you were told you need 2-6 millions to detect a nuclear bomb explosion yet none around in the past million years, just what logic would you use. frankly you are really struggling on this topic. Sorry you are confused.
 
I hope you're right about our morality but I think you're wrong about our physical evolution. I seem to recall there are people who live high up in the Andes that have extra hemoglobin in their blood to compensate for the lack of oxygen. Also there are people that gather their food from the ocean and can hold their breath for a very long time due to some physiological changes.
Our morality is evolving downward; devolving as it were. :(
 
This is what psychosis looks like.

View attachment 1076280
I loved the movie Black Robe...and the message of the climax, when the Indian tribe finally caved to the Jesuits and agreed to spread the faith to other neighboring tribes. As a result the tribe was massacred by their neighbors. And the title character tearfully made the point to his fellows that the Indians were ALREADY living "for each other" as Jesus wished....BEFORE the Jesuits showed up preaching their blasphemous, hypocritical bullshit.
 
Where do homosexuals stand in evidence of evolution?
I don't know but every mammalian species seems to have them. There are plenty of species where some individuals don't reproduce. Bees for example. Maybe having a homosexual sibling offers more protection and more resources for your offspring. Since siblings share DNA, it is a plus.

Where do homosexuals stand in evidence of non-evolution theories?
 
I loved the movie Black Robe...and the message of the climax, when the Indian tribe finally caved to the Jesuits and agreed to spread the faith to other neighboring tribes. As a result the tribe was massacred by their neighbors. And the title character tearfully made the point to his fellows that the Indians were ALREADY living "for each other" as Jesus wished....BEFORE the Jesuits showed up preaching their blasphemous, hypocritical bullshit.
Why do massacres appeal to you?
 
I don't know but every mammalian species seems to have them. There are plenty of species where some individuals don't reproduce. Bees for example. Maybe having a homosexual sibling offers more protection and more resources for your offspring. Since siblings share DNA, it is a plus.

Where do homosexuals stand in evidence of non-evolution theories?
Seems you tell me? You don't know you tell me?

Here is an issue that occured to me today.

If blacks came first, if true, is it true whites evolved into a superior human form?
 
I hope you're right about our morality but I think you're wrong about our physical evolution. I seem to recall there are people who live high up in the Andes that have extra hemoglobin in their blood to compensate for the lack of oxygen. Also there are people that gather their food from the ocean and can hold their breath for a very long time due to some physiological changes.
As to the Andes and Himalayas too, such evolvement is evidence of improvements.
It is not proof humans evolve into something else.

You talked about Apes. What will be the stage should humans further evolve in your theory?
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom