- Sep 9, 2022
- 25,220
- 12,308
- 1,288
- Thread starter
- #301
OK, be funny. You understood I was talking only of humans. So humans are not any part of the topic?The world is not on the path to destruction, just humanity, but that is off-topic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OK, be funny. You understood I was talking only of humans. So humans are not any part of the topic?The world is not on the path to destruction, just humanity, but that is off-topic.
and how did those apes come to be??You may not be as hard to fool as you think. Humans evolved from non-human apes. Like all apes today, those apes had a brain, heart, lungs, etc.
Humans are apes. Why don't you accept that?Why do you simply accept that?
What happened to you is you shifted the questions about humans to the same questions about apes.
Frankly you are acting on this forum as our superior person on the topic of Evolution. But you are stumped. I have a university book on evolution. I have maybe a dozen books on this topic for laypersons.I don't. Bacteria are still complex life forms that took hundreds of millions of years to evolve. He may be right that they are my ancestors but then I have lots of ancestors.
The fact that you feel this are valid questions merely demonstrate your ignorance of evolution. None are real problems.
I'm sure any photos you have that were taken in East Africa, 4-6 million years ago will settle the question.Surely there are apes proving your theory. Where are apes forming into humans?
Maybe you have photographs.
Got apes in transition to prove that theory?Humans are apes. Why don't you accept that?
Early life? Yes. First life? No.Frankly you are acting on this forum as our superior person on the topic of Evolution. But you are stumped. I have a university book on evolution. I have maybe a dozen books on this topic for laypersons.
Here is your problem. This planet, early on was lifeless. Dr. Schopf I quote from believes he discovered first life. Not earlier than life, but first life.
Darwin live over 100 years ago. We know more now.Do you understand that Darwin said in his book he is confused? But you say you are not confused by his book!!!
Plenty of evidence for it. Fossils, DNA, and anatomical studies.Got apes in transition to prove that theory?
They evolved from ancestral primates.and how did those apes come to be??
So evolution is too slow to be detected yet you think you detected it 4-6 millions of years ago? Correct? IF you were told you need 2-6 millions to detect a nuclear bomb explosion yet none around in the past million years, just what logic would you use. frankly you are really struggling on this topic. Sorry you are confused.I'm sure any photos you have that were taken in East Africa, 4-6 million years ago will settle the question.
Our morality is evolving downward; devolving as it were.I hope you're right about our morality but I think you're wrong about our physical evolution. I seem to recall there are people who live high up in the Andes that have extra hemoglobin in their blood to compensate for the lack of oxygen. Also there are people that gather their food from the ocean and can hold their breath for a very long time due to some physiological changes.
I loved the movie Black Robe...and the message of the climax, when the Indian tribe finally caved to the Jesuits and agreed to spread the faith to other neighboring tribes. As a result the tribe was massacred by their neighbors. And the title character tearfully made the point to his fellows that the Indians were ALREADY living "for each other" as Jesus wished....BEFORE the Jesuits showed up preaching their blasphemous, hypocritical bullshit.
Where do homosexuals stand in evidence of evolution?They evolved from ancestral primates.
Our morality is evolving downward; devolving as it were.![]()
walk me through that process please..They evolved from ancestral primates.
I don't know but every mammalian species seems to have them. There are plenty of species where some individuals don't reproduce. Bees for example. Maybe having a homosexual sibling offers more protection and more resources for your offspring. Since siblings share DNA, it is a plus.Where do homosexuals stand in evidence of evolution?
Why do massacres appeal to you?I loved the movie Black Robe...and the message of the climax, when the Indian tribe finally caved to the Jesuits and agreed to spread the faith to other neighboring tribes. As a result the tribe was massacred by their neighbors. And the title character tearfully made the point to his fellows that the Indians were ALREADY living "for each other" as Jesus wished....BEFORE the Jesuits showed up preaching their blasphemous, hypocritical bullshit.
Seems you tell me? You don't know you tell me?I don't know but every mammalian species seems to have them. There are plenty of species where some individuals don't reproduce. Bees for example. Maybe having a homosexual sibling offers more protection and more resources for your offspring. Since siblings share DNA, it is a plus.
Where do homosexuals stand in evidence of non-evolution theories?
What makes you think massacres appeal to me?Why do massacres appeal to you?
As to the Andes and Himalayas too, such evolvement is evidence of improvements.I hope you're right about our morality but I think you're wrong about our physical evolution. I seem to recall there are people who live high up in the Andes that have extra hemoglobin in their blood to compensate for the lack of oxygen. Also there are people that gather their food from the ocean and can hold their breath for a very long time due to some physiological changes.