Why don't people want to know the truth about 9/11?

[LA RAM FAN]

You do know that the physics are THIS basic that Richard's point is ACTUALLY SO basic that proves 9/11 was a controlled demolition. It is LITERALLY that basic. that little block cannot destroy the bigger block, ESPECIALLY IN FREE FALL ACCELERATION. The fact that you LAUGH at NEWTON's 3rd LAW is embarrassing.

First of all, they are NOT BLOCKS. They are empty cardboard BOXES......You could drop the GREAT BIG BOX on top of LITTLE BOX, and GREAT BIG BOX will not destroy LITTLE BOX!.....Those cardboard BOXES regardless of size, have the exact same crush rating.

All this proves, is that you troofer loons are so god damn gullible it's laughable!

BASED OF NEWTONS 3rd LAW OF EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION:

With Gravity

A small Box (same object) cannot Crush a BIGGER box (same object) in ACCELERATION, let alone at all.

30 floors of WTC (the SAME object) cannot CRUSH 70 floors of WTC (the SAME object). LET ALONE AT ACCELERATION.

it's this basic, and you cannot even understand it.........................

He sure cant.these OCTA'S like Brian and wicked,dont get it that to accept the governments version of events,you got to ignore the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years.they obviously slept through juniour high science classes.

 

[DiveCon]

what I just said to him Gomer applies to you as well.You agents sure get paid well,you sure wouldnt keep coming back for the ass beatings you get here everyday if they didnt.

you are fucking delusional
LOL
but funny

 

[DiveCon]

First of all, they are NOT BLOCKS. They are empty cardboard BOXES......You could drop the GREAT BIG BOX on top of LITTLE BOX, and GREAT BIG BOX will not destroy LITTLE BOX!.....Those cardboard BOXES regardless of size, have the exact same crush rating.

All this proves, is that you troofer loons are so god damn gullible it's laughable!

BASED OF NEWTONS 3rd LAW OF EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION:

With Gravity

A small Box (same object) cannot Crush a BIGGER box (same object) in ACCELERATION, let alone at all.

30 floors of WTC (the SAME object) cannot CRUSH 70 floors of WTC (the SAME object). LET ALONE AT ACCELERATION.

it's this basic, and you cannot even understand it.........................

He sure cant.these OCTA'S like Brian and wicked,dont get it that to accept the governments version of events,you got to ignore the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years.they obviously slept through juniour high science classes.

except its YOU morons ignoring the laws of physics

 

[LA RAM FAN]

they were not looking for any [evidence]...what would you expect to find ? and many family members and first responders have voiced there belife the 9/11 commison was a cover-up and are active in 9/11 truth

Bullshit. These officials are trained to look for evidence. They were also motivated by the death of their loved ones. Now a few weak minded rescue workers have been bamboozled into siding with the truthers without any physical evidence. They have nothing! These whack-jobs are all discredited every-time they say the towers fell at free-fall speed. All the video of the collapse show free-falling debris falling to the ground much faster than the collapsing buildings.

Lies as always,you just blatantly ignore the evidence like the paid troll you are.you alos as always OMIT the facts that the firefighters HEARD explosions and when they found out the offical explanation of the governments,they called the investigation a half baked farce because they knew explosives were planted.jet fuel fires dont cause molten metal,neither do office fires and they reported seeing molten metal.you also fail to mention that NIST was caught lying saying NOBODY reported seeing molten metal.YOU are the one that has been discredited and have NOTHING!! and yes they do have physical evidence,you just blatantly ignore it like the paid troll you are.you always run off with your tail between your legs when asked to debunk this video or link,you just post a bunch of crap that proves nothing when this video and these links are shown to you.

nobody has ever been able to debunk this at any message board,hundreds have tried but never have been able to despite what you OCTA'S come on here and say.or the two links below either.


Explosive Residues: Energetic Materials and the World Trade Center Destruction

Active Thermitics Made Simple

 

[SFC Ollie]

It's got to be the drugs. There can be no logical explanation other than that.

 

[eots]

It's got to be the drugs. There can be no logical explanation other than that.

you mean the ones the gave you in the ..armmmy

 

[SFC Ollie]

It's got to be the drugs. There can be no logical explanation other than that.

you mean the ones the gave you in the ..armmmy

You know exactly what I mean. And I'm not the one taking them.

 

[eots]

It's got to be the drugs. There can be no logical explanation other than that.

you mean the ones the gave you in the ..armmmy

You know exactly what I mean. And I'm not the one taking them.

righhhht....ok then

 

[SFC Ollie]

they were not looking for any [evidence]...what would you expect to find ? and many family members and first responders have voiced there belife the 9/11 commison was a cover-up and are active in 9/11 truth

Bullshit. These officials are trained to look for evidence. They were also motivated by the death of their loved ones. Now a few weak minded rescue workers have been bamboozled into siding with the truthers without any physical evidence. They have nothing! These whack-jobs are all discredited every-time they say the towers fell at free-fall speed. All the video of the collapse show free-falling debris falling to the ground much faster than the collapsing buildings.

Lies as always,you just blatantly ignore the evidence like the paid troll you are.you alos as always OMIT the facts that the firefighters HEARD explosions and when they found out the offical explanation of the governments,they called the investigation a half baked farce because they knew explosives were planted.jet fuel fires dont cause molten metal,neither do office fires and they reported seeing molten metal.you also fail to mention that NIST was caught lying saying NOBODY reported seeing molten metal.YOU are the one that has been discredited and have NOTHING!! and yes they do have physical evidence,you just blatantly ignore it like the paid troll you are.you always run off with your tail between your legs when asked to debunk this video or link,you just post a bunch of crap that proves nothing when this video and these links are shown to you.

nobody has ever been able to debunk this at any message board,hundreds have tried but never have been able to despite what you OCTA'S come on here and say.or the two links below either.


Explosive Residues: Energetic Materials and the World Trade Center Destruction

Active Thermitics Made Simple

Let's look at the video again....

Starts with some firemen hearing a secondary explosion. Where was the explosion? What exploded? A battery? A car fuel tank? We haven't a clue from the video presented. Except that they didn't appear overly concerned about it. Why? Because there are normally secondary explosions in a high rise office fire.

Now we move to newscasters talking about what? Secondary explosions, doing what? Going off every 15 or 20 minutes. That is not the way to bring down a building.

OMG someone reported a suspicious device........

Some police (notice no names) said there "may have been" a van parked in the building? Really? I bet there were a few dozen vans parked in the parking area of the building, or more.

Federal agencies believe what? (again no name to go with the claim)

Finally a name Chief Albert Turry, He received word of a secondary device. Really? From who? Why didn't the reporter follow up on it? He thinks, he speculates...

Are we getting the picture here? No one knew what was happening that morning.

And now we have the firemen telling people there's a bomb in the building. Says who? Where did this come from? Why didn't it explode? Why weren't all these reports followed up on?

Now the last 2 minutes have been snippets of people talking about secondary explosions. Could be different ones could be the same one. there really is no telling. The video was not put together to inform but to confuse.

And more of the same for the rest of the video.

No proof of anything all guess work as to what the people were actually describing.

 

[eots]

there were several reports of huge secondary explosions on the upper floors a likely cause of any....bowing

 

[DiveCon]

there were several reports of huge secondary explosions on the upper floors a likely cause of any....bowing

LOL yeah
an explosion will cause things to bow in towards the explosion

 

[eots]

there were several reports of huge secondary explosions on the upper floors a likely cause of any....bowing

LOL yeah
an explosion will cause things to bow in towards the explosion

if fire can weaken a structure then an explosion certainly can and depending on what piece of the structure was damaged it could very well cause bowing...dumb-ass

 

[DiveCon]

there were several reports of huge secondary explosions on the upper floors a likely cause of any....bowing

LOL yeah
an explosion will cause things to bow in towards the explosion

if fire can weaken a structure then an explosion certainly can and depending on what piece of the structure was damaged it could very well cause bowing...dumb-ass

ROLFMAO

you are such a moron

 

[eots]

oh my have I been....DEBWUNKED

 

[Wicked Jester]

First of all, they are NOT BLOCKS. They are empty cardboard BOXES......You could drop the GREAT BIG BOX on top of LITTLE BOX, and GREAT BIG BOX will not destroy LITTLE BOX!.....Those cardboard BOXES regardless of size, have the exact same crush rating.

All this proves, is that you troofer loons are so god damn gullible it's laughable!

BASED OF NEWTONS 3rd LAW OF EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION:

With Gravity

A small Box (same object) cannot Crush a BIGGER box (same object) in ACCELERATION, let alone at all.

30 floors of WTC (the SAME object) cannot CRUSH 70 floors of WTC (the SAME object). LET ALONE AT ACCELERATION.

it's this basic, and you cannot even understand it.........................

He sure cant.these OCTA'S like Brian and wicked,dont get it that to accept the governments version of events,you got to ignore the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years.they obviously slept through juniour high science classes.

That douchebag dropped a lil' BOX on top of a big BOX from a height of 1 inch....Lil' BOX didn't crush big BOX.............Well, NO SHIT!

Christ, you people are fuckin' stupid.......And obviously, gullible as all get out.

 

[eots]

so would you of preferred he drop a little steel and concrete box on a big concrete and steel box ?...and if he did...what would you expect to happen ?

 

[Wicked Jester]

so would you of preferred he drop a little steel and concrete box on a big concrete and steel box ?...and if he did...what would you expect to happen ?

Yep!

Or, at least fly a scale model 757 full speed, fully loaded with fuel and lil' pasengers, light it on fire until BIG BOXES structure is fully weakened, and then drop LIL' BOX on BIG BOX.

C'mon eots, you have to know that video and demonstration if fuckin' laughable, and proves absolutely nothing.

Anybody who thinks otherwise is a gullible fool.

 

[BrianH]

First of all, they are NOT BLOCKS. They are empty cardboard BOXES......You could drop the GREAT BIG BOX on top of LITTLE BOX, and GREAT BIG BOX will not destroy LITTLE BOX!.....Those cardboard BOXES regardless of size, have the exact same crush rating.

All this proves, is that you troofer loons are so god damn gullible it's laughable!

BASED OF NEWTONS 3rd LAW OF EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION:

With Gravity

A small Box (same object) cannot Crush a BIGGER box (same object) in ACCELERATION, let alone at all.

30 floors of WTC (the SAME object) cannot CRUSH 70 floors of WTC (the SAME object). LET ALONE AT ACCELERATION.

it's this basic, and you cannot even understand it.........................

He sure cant.these OCTA'S like Brian and wicked,dont get it that to accept the governments version of events,you got to ignore the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years.they obviously slept through juniour high science classes.

I'm not accepting the government's version. I think they knew more than they let on. Do I think they did it? lol. No. This conspiracy has been debunked over and over again by top engineers. (You'll say they are government hired engineers--typical)

 

[DiveCon]

BASED OF NEWTONS 3rd LAW OF EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION:

With Gravity

A small Box (same object) cannot Crush a BIGGER box (same object) in ACCELERATION, let alone at all.

30 floors of WTC (the SAME object) cannot CRUSH 70 floors of WTC (the SAME object). LET ALONE AT ACCELERATION.

it's this basic, and you cannot even understand it.........................

He sure cant.these OCTA'S like Brian and wicked,dont get it that to accept the governments version of events,you got to ignore the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years.they obviously slept through juniour high science classes.

I'm not accepting the government's version. I think they knew more than they let on. Do I think they did it? lol. No. This conspiracy has been debunked over and over again by top engineers. (You'll say they are government hired engineers--typical)

to him, anyone that actually thinks and requires actual facts is a bush dupe

 

[eots]

BASED OF NEWTONS 3rd LAW OF EQUAL AND OPPOSITE REACTION:

With Gravity

A small Box (same object) cannot Crush a BIGGER box (same object) in ACCELERATION, let alone at all.

30 floors of WTC (the SAME object) cannot CRUSH 70 floors of WTC (the SAME object). LET ALONE AT ACCELERATION.

it's this basic, and you cannot even understand it.........................

He sure cant.these OCTA'S like Brian and wicked,dont get it that to accept the governments version of events,you got to ignore the laws of physics that scientists have gone by for thousands of years.they obviously slept through juniour high science classes.

I'm not accepting the government's version. I think they knew more than they let on. Do I think they did it? lol. No. This conspiracy has been debunked over and over again by top engineers. (You'll say they are government hired engineers--typical)

can you name any of these top engineers