Why don't people want to know the truth about 9/11?

[Wicked Jester]

- The towers were struck by 25% larger planes than the Boeing 707 it was designed to withstand.
- Lost 20% of its supporting columns from the planes impact.
- Had to support an additional 100,000-lbs of aircraft debris.
- Lost most of the structural fire-proofing insulation from impact explosion.
- Lost its fire suppression & sprinkler system severed by aircraft.
- Remaining steel structure lost over 60% of its strength due to 650°C fires.
- Plane impacted fully charged UPC battery rooms blasting sulfuric acid all over the remaining structure.
- Plane destroyed the extra support beams installed to hold the weight of all those batteries.

DUH! Gee-Wiz Wally, I don't understand why the tower collapsed!

Not to mention, waves of burning jet fuel was sent down most of the elevator shafts.

 

[eots]

-

The towers were struck by 25% larger planes than the Boeing 707 it was designed to withstand.

were designed to take multiple sticks

- Lost 20% of its supporting columns from the planes impact

.

theory

Had to support an additional 100,000-lbs of aircraft debris.

questionable

- Lost most of the structural fire-proofing insulation from impact explosion.

theory.. no evidence

- Lost its fire suppression & sprinkler system severed by aircraft.

as have many buildings burning much longer and far more intensely without collapse

- Remaining steel structure lost over 60% of its strength due to 650°C fires.

no evidence of predicted temperatures

- Plane impacted fully charged UPC battery rooms blasting sulfuric acid all over the remaining structure.

utter nonsense and in direct contradiction with the NIST report

- Plane destroyed the extra support beams installed to hold the weight of all those batteries.

more nonsense battery boy theory in contradiction with the NIST report

DUH! Gee-Wiz Wally, I don't understand why the tower collapsed

most likely controlled demolition

 

[eots]

- The towers were struck by 25% larger planes than the Boeing 707 it was designed to withstand.
- Lost 20% of its supporting columns from the planes impact.
- Had to support an additional 100,000-lbs of aircraft debris.
- Lost most of the structural fire-proofing insulation from impact explosion.
- Lost its fire suppression & sprinkler system severed by aircraft.
- Remaining steel structure lost over 60% of its strength due to 650°C fires.
- Plane impacted fully charged UPC battery rooms blasting sulfuric acid all over the remaining structure.
- Plane destroyed the extra support beams installed to hold the weight of all those batteries.

DUH! Gee-Wiz Wally, I don't understand why the tower collapsed!

Not to mention, waves of burning jet fuel was sent down most of the elevator shafts.

the fuel was burned off almost immediately

 

[BrianH]

-

The towers were struck by 25% larger planes than the Boeing 707 it was designed to withstand.

were designed to take multiple sticks


.

theory



questionable

theory.. no evidence




as have many buildings burning much longer and far more intensely without collapse



no evidence of predicted temperatures



utter nonsense and in direct contradiction with the NIST report




more nonsense battery boy theory in contradiction with the NIST report

DUH! Gee-Wiz Wally, I don't understand why the tower collapsed

most likely controlled demolition

This event has never before in the history of mankind. We have NO IDEA what would have or should have happened under said conditions. You could build a hundred WTC towers, fly a hundred planes into each of them, and possibly have 100 different results. There is no trendable result for such an event.

 

[eots]

-

were designed to take multiple sticks


.

theory



questionable

theory.. no evidence




as have many buildings burning much longer and far more intensely without collapse



no evidence of predicted temperatures



utter nonsense and in direct contradiction with the NIST report




more nonsense battery boy theory in contradiction with the NIST report




most likely controlled demolition

This event has never before in the history of mankind. We have NO IDEA what would have or should have happened under said conditions. You could build a hundred WTC towers, fly a hundred planes into each of them, and possibly have 100 different results. There is no trendable result for such an event.

but yet three buildings fell in secs...gee what are the odds

 

[BrianH]

This event has never before in the history of mankind. We have NO IDEA what would have or should have happened under said conditions. You could build a hundred WTC towers, fly a hundred planes into each of them, and possibly have 100 different results. There is no trendable result for such an event.

but yet three buildings fell in secs...gee what are the odds

Exactly. What are the odds? No one knows. Hasn't happened before. All "odds" start with something happening first.

 

[eots]

well it would appear the odds are 2 planes equal 3 near free-fall collapse

 

[eots]

but yet three buildings fell in secs...gee what are the odds

Exactly. What are the odds? No one knows. Hasn't happened before. All "odds" start with something happening first.

btw...planes have hit skyscrapers before and many more have gone on fire without collapse in fact the wtc 7 was the first known instance of a hi- rise building collapsing primarily due to fire

 

[eots]

The fall of the 47-story World Trade Center building 7 (WTC 7) in New York City late in the afternoon of Sept. 11, 2001, was primarily due to fires, the Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) announced today following an extensive, three-year scientific and technical building and fire safety investigation. This was the first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building, the agency stated as it released for public comment its WTC investigation

http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NIST_NCSTAR_1A_for_public_comment.pdf

 

[BrianH]

Exactly. What are the odds? No one knows. Hasn't happened before. All "odds" start with something happening first.

btw...planes have hit skyscrapers before and many more have gone on fire without collapse in fact the wtc 7 was the first known instance of a hi- rise building collapsing primarily due to fire

Planes this size have never hit skyscrapers the size of the WTC buildings. This scenario has not happened.

 

[eots]

No plane hit the wtc 7.....are you saying it is impossible to determine the cause of a collapse?

 

[BrianH]

No plane hit the wtc 7.....are you saying it is impossible to determine the cause of a collapse?

No, but I'm saying that a BIG ASS building fell right next to it. It's called collateral damage. The fires and structure damage was on the lower floors of building 7. A critical support of the 13th floor failed. Also, lack of water pressure caused the fire supression system to be ineffective.

 

[eots]

No plane hit the wtc 7.....are you saying it is impossible to determine the cause of a collapse?

No, but I'm saying that a BIG ASS building fell right next to it. It's called collateral damage. The fires and structure damage was on the lower floors of building 7. A critical support of the 13th floor failed. Also, lack of water pressure caused the fire supression system to be ineffective.

NIST stated damage not significant in the collapse and fire was the cause

 

[eots]

 

[DiveCon]

well it would appear the odds are 2 planes equal 3 near free-fall collapse

dipshit, 8 buildings were destroyed on 9/11 and several more severely damaged

 

[eots]

well it would appear the odds are 2 planes equal 3 near free-fall collapse

dipshit, 8 buildings were destroyed on 9/11 and several more severely damaged

how many were hi -rise...how many suffered a complete collapse in seconds
read much... dipshit

 

[DiveCon]

well it would appear the odds are 2 planes equal 3 near free-fall collapse

dipshit, 8 buildings were destroyed on 9/11 and several more severely damaged

how many were hi -rise...how many suffered a complete collapse in seconds
read much... dipshit

yeah, i've read a lot
and none of it supports your bullshit

 

[eots]

your dog-eared copy of popular mechanics doesn't really count

 

[DiveCon]

your dog-eared copy of popular mechanics doesn't really count

nor does your devotion to alex jones

 

[KissMy]

How did Bush or who-ever planned this, execute this huge coordinated demolition of 4 buildings without anyone getting caught, screwing up or squealing on them. Remember the Pentagon also collapsed along with WTC 1, 2 &7. Explain 4 crashed hijackings complete with phone calls to loved ones, 4 buildings imploding from synchronized thermite shaped charges. Countless people involved in the clean-up & non of them have any evidence.

Now you are saying our government pulled this elaborate hoax off on the American people when they can't properly fight either of the wars going on. Can't get Osama Bin Laden, Can't rescue Katrina survivors, & can't even scramble fighters to intercept hijacked aircraft. But somehow they managed to pull this massive & complex illusion off without a hitch. Even Wikileaks can't find anything suggesting this was a hoax. Obama & the Democrats have not found any evidence. All you truthers have no evidence. There have to be remains of the devices or destroyed steel somewhere.