Why do the anti-gun folks believe our children are not important enough to protect?

[Markle]

Right. Because Trump was known for his high approval rating.

That's all you've got? Surprise, surprise, surprise!

 

[XponentialChaos]

That's all you've got? Surprise, surprise, surprise!

?

 

[Woodznutz]

Post the evidence then.

I'm talking about problems that are pretty obvious.

 

[Woodznutz]

I don’t deal in feelings. If you make a claim, then back it up.

I don't have to make a 'claim' about something that is obvious.

 

[XponentialChaos]

I'm talking about problems that are pretty obvious.

So you have no evidence. Just feelings. Got it.

 

[XponentialChaos]

I don't have to make a 'claim' about something that is obvious.

You have nothing.

 

[Woodznutz]

t anymore.

Time to adapt and do something about this issue. But we won’t.

Maybe because the changes some want are too radical. If a house needs paint you don't tear it down and build a new one.

 

[Woodznutz]

So you have no evidence. Just feelings. Got it.

If you don't see the problems I can't help you.

 

[Woodznutz]

You have nothing.

What should be done won't be done, so you win there. Congratulations.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Maybe because the changes some want are too radical. If a house needs paint you don't tear it down and build a new one.

Anything is too radical for you guys. You want nothing done.

 

[XponentialChaos]

If you don't see the problems I can't help you.

I already told you that I deal with facts, not your feelings.

 

[XponentialChaos]

What should be done won't be done, so you win there. Congratulations.

I know.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Why do the anti-gun folks support not protecting our children?

It is simple, by allowing kids to be intentionally killed by psychopaths, they feel we'll cave and they can take our guns. If they take our guns, will they no longer need folks WITH GUNS to protect them?

This is a lie – no one is ‘anti-gun.’

No one seeks to ‘take’ anyone’s guns.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

That's just goofy!

Your thread premise is a lie and fails as a strawman fallacy.

No one is allowing kids to be killed by psychopaths, ‘intentionally’ or otherwise.

No one seeks to ‘ban’ guns or ‘confiscate’ guns.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

You have to admit that there is a heck of a lot about which to vilify President Biden.

Another lie – there’s no valid reason to vilify President Biden.

 

[Blues Man]

Do you support schools that resemble prisons?

Cut the shit with this ridiculous argument.

Locking the fucking doors at a school and controlling who can enter does not turn that school into a prison,

 

[surada]

"Why do the anti-gun folks believe our children are not important enough to protect?"​

Why do libs make these stupid breathless 12 year old girl arguments and expect to be taken seriously?

Israel limits gun ownership to one gun and 50 bullets.

 

[j-mac]

.

I didn't say anything about the young man and was addressing a post about hunting ...
Just like the Second Amendment isn't about hunting or going to the range.

If you need to mischaracterize everything to even try to make a point, you lose credibility ... Please continue.

.​

I’m not trying to mischaracterize anything….The reason this conversation is even relevant today is because of THIS current event, and the desperate need for democrats to have something to fire up their base.

In todays climate, where crime is rampant, homocides are out of control, and the economy in the tank, this horrible event raises some good questions.

Now I, as a CCP holder, 2a advocate, and constitutional conservative would like to see these tragedies end, and since my reps don’t seem to take what IMO is the real issue, mental health seriously, and not wanting to abridge rights, think that putting an age limit on weapons that can be used for situations like this may be appropriate…

 

[j-mac]

Israel limits gun ownership to one gun and 50 bullets.

So?

 

[surada]

So?

They have had two school shootings since 1974.