- Thread starter
- #81
You meant to write:Elk v. Wilkins, and Slaughter-House Cases are both held to be moot by most legal scholars.
Elk v. Wilkins, and Slaughter-House Cases are both held to be moot by our open border crowd.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You meant to write:Elk v. Wilkins, and Slaughter-House Cases are both held to be moot by most legal scholars.
There is no "Birth Right Citizenship" written into our Constitution for the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born on American soil, which is what Trump’s Executive Order, “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship”, deals with.Birth Right Citizenship is written into Constitution, 47 cannot take away a Constitutionally Protected Right, I realize MAGA MAGGOTS don't that, but live with. Nor is the country of origin of birth parents disqualify a person born in the U.S. ALL PERSONS means ALL PERSONS!
Birth Right Citizenship is written into Constitution, 47 cannot take away a Constitutionally Protected Right, I realize MAGA MAGGOTS don't that, but live with. Nor is the country of origin of birth parents disqualify a person born in the U.S. ALL PERSONS means ALL PERSONS!
Still waiting for your evidence.
Except for the 14th Amendment..
Essentially, President’s Trump’s Executive Order sets a new federal public policy under which the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national, born on American soil, will no longer be recognized as a United States citizen upon birth.
Keep in mind there is nothing in our Constitution, a federal statute, or a Supreme Court ruling, which pronounces that a child born on American soil to an illegal entrant foreign national is a U.S. citizen upon birth.
...