Why there can be no compromise with the anti-gun side of the debate....

[80zephyr]

Straight up lies.

We have other countries to use as examples.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

YOu still have your gun?

.



Stalking, right here mods.

Member wants to know to what extent I can protect myself.




.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

tRumpling whack-jobs to stop posting lies.

.


Possibly the minute left cult liars do the same.




.

 

[Zincwarrior]

I'll bet you do.

You're such a scary man!

IIRC, isn't this what Democrats at the time insisted our troops carry into Vietnam?

M16 actually. The Garand mafia wanted the M14.

 

[Zincwarrior]

.



Stalking, right here mods.

Member wants to know to what extent I can protect myself.




.

Wait you only have one? Get thee to a sporting goods store!

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Wait you only have one? Get thee to a sporting goods store!

.



More stalking. The left loons want to know about my ability to protect myself.




.

 

[Zincwarrior]

.



More stalking. The left loons want to know about my ability to protect myself.




.

Not I said the spy.

 

[Crepitus]

Because I don't react emotionally to gun violence and gun accidents like you do.

Wait, is it logical or emotional?

 

[ding]

Wait, is it logical or emotional?

Your response to gun violence and gun accidents is ever increasing regulations which is an emotional response. The logical conclusion of such emotional responses is to ban and confiscate all firearms because the ever increasing regulations won't stop gun violence or gun accidents. Now do you understand?

 

[2aguy]

You'll have to do better than an opinion piece from an obvious alt-right source.
Give us a concrete example of someone or some entity trying to ban all guns.
And let's not waste everyone's time with the whole "slippery slope" argument.
Give us a real example.

Cause...I just looked downstairs..and yep..I still got my guns. Nobody's taken them..and I don't see any emails or text messages saying confiscation is imminent.

The anti-gun activists are going to ban all the guns they can.....they are taking their fight to cities and states, since they keep losing at the federal level...California and Illinois are now moving to ban Glock handguns.......one gun at a time to boil the frog...

 

[Crepitus]

Your response to gun violence and gun accidents is ever increasing regulations which is an emotional response. The logical conclusion of such emotional responses is to ban and confiscate all firearms because the ever increasing regulations won't stop gun violence or gun accidents. Now do you understand?

Oooh, I see!

You're rationalizing!

Or at least trying.

News for ya kiddo, I'm not anti-gun, I have more than a few, a CC license I rarely use, and until recently held FFL 11 because of my business.

I'm pro gun control because we do not need whack-jobs carrying rifles into convenience stores.

 

[ding]

Oooh, I see!

You're rationalizing!

Or at least trying.

News for ya kiddo, I'm not anti-gun, I have more than a few, a CC license I rarely use, and until recently held FFL 11 because of my business.

I'm pro gun control because we do not need whack-jobs carrying rifles into convenience stores.

I'm not rationalizing and you owning a gun doesn't change a thing I said. I gave you an opportunity to state your position at the very beginning of this conversation. You declined.

So let me state your position objectively... you would take away the rights of the vast majority because of one off instances done by a very tiny majority. Doesn't that sound stupid when it's said that way? Doesn't it sound like you are emotional about this when it is said that way?

 

[whitehall]

The dirty little secret kept by democrats and the corrupt media is "confiscation". We have reduced the murder rate in the mid west by arresting and deporting illegal aliens but the corrupt media won't make that point, instead they want to make felons of every law abiding citizen who owns a firearm unless they surrender it.

 

[ding]

The dirty little secret kept by democrats and the corrupt media is "confiscation". We have reduced the murder rate in the mid west by arresting and deporting illegal aliens but the corrupt media won't make that point, instead they want to make felons of every law abiding citizen who owns a firearm unless they surrender it.

Yes because if only 3 people out of every 100,000 people perform a bad act the other 99,997 people out of every 100,000 people should have their rights taken away. Brilliant.

Don't you agree Crepitus ?

 

[Crepitus]

I'm not rationalizing and you owning a gun doesn't change a thing I said. I gave you an opportunity to state your position at the very beginning of this conversation. You declined.

So let me state your position objectively... you would take away the rights of the vast majority because of one off instances done by a very tiny majority. Doesn't that sound stupid when it's said that way? Doesn't it sound like you are emotional about this when it is said that way?

Lol, I would require training, licensing, and insurance for carry.

YOu can own any damn thing you want, just don't take it to the public park without proper licensing that certifies you know how to use and care for it properly as well as a liability policy to cover the inevitable accidents.

 

[ding]

Lol, I would require training, licensing, and insurance for carry.

YOu can own any damn thing you want, just don't take it to the public park without proper licensing that certifies you know how to use and care for it properly as well as a liability policy to cover the inevitable accidents.

Don't crawfish away from it now. Lean into it. You've already said what you really believe. See?

I'm pro gun control because we do not need whack-jobs carrying rifles into convenience stores.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Oooh, I see!

You're rationalizing!

Or at least trying.

News for ya kiddo, I'm not anti-gun, I have more than a few, a CC license I rarely use, and until recently held FFL 11 because of my business.

I'm pro gun control because we do not need whack-jobs carrying rifles into convenience stores.

We used to make fun of these two guys when open carry protests were a thing here.

 

[Crepitus]

Yes because if only 3 people out of every 100,000 people perform a bad act the other 99,997 people out of every 100,000 people should have their rights taken away. Brilliant.

Don't you agree Crepitus ?

Talking to tRumplings is like talking to a dog. They look like they are listening but it just goes in one ear and out the other and they go back to licking their own butts as soon as you finish talking.

 

[ding]

as well as a liability policy to cover the inevitable accidents.

That's not a requirement. Not even for concealed carry. That would be up to each person to decide for themselves.

 

[Crepitus]

Don't crawfish away from it now. Lean into it. You've already said what you really believe. See?

See my post above.