I'm not.
He isn't even close.
Still not.
No it isn't
Only a low life would support a murder cover up.
THAT is a true story
There has been no cover up. You really need to get a grip.
How was it not a cover up.
The Administration had a real time video of the attack while it was going on through a predator drone, (so i guess they couldn't believe what their eyes were seeing?) but they still blamed this on protesters and a youtube video
The Whitehouse, and about 300 state department and security officials received an email within 2 hours of the attack stating that a "militant" group was claiming responsibility for the attack. The president went into the rose garden the next day and talked about a video and a protest that turned violent. He also used the word terror here, but in contrast to how many times he and the administration wanted to talk about the protest over the video, It is clear what direction the president wanted to take the american people.
We have seen this administration in the past try to downgrade or downplay acts of terror. Take for instance the Fort Hood attack, I believe the President labeled it workplace violence, despite a muslim man shooting up the place yelling "allah akbar." Hmm, thats funny, that is the same thing suicide bombers yell before they detonate.
So huggy... how was the president not trying to mislead the people?