So, you offer no proof that there was no cheating, just announce that everyone's suspicions are wrong as if that closes the matter. And, because you announce that there was no cheating, you expect that there should be no independent investigation. And you expect to be taken seriously? Go away
Well actually I have posted the results of what one state found about 150 problems and found 4 confirmed instances of cheating and state is prosecuting the cases. The rest are still in review. Still that amount does not change the outcome. It also show that the state is not quick to point the finger until the have all the answers.
Yet seriously how can there be no cheating when example of cheating exist in every election. The difference is that I will also ask does it change the results. Your statement just say wants to ask if there is cheating and conclude that Trump won. Yet you obviously believe that it caused Trump the election. Thus you want an investigation.
Yet the states have done recounts. Still not enough for you because the results is not what you wanted.
So they want an audit led by a person who has stated publically that he believes the election was fraudulent.
That is the fox watching the hen house and that is not a audit.
So not only is he getting paid to do something that he believes, he really has no experience in elections. So he trying to find things that support his theories but has no idea if it really is something to be concerned about
If your going to have an audit or recount it should be done by people who are experienced in the mechanics of an election.
The Arizona audit is just a rubber stamp that is try to be used to defend Trump. There is no verifiable proof of anything that says Trump won the election.
The proof is that when a republican dared to challenge the presumption that Trump won, he is blocked from participating because he found something that goes against the reason for the audit . Which is to find a reason why Trump should have won?
Yet if you believe the public has a right to know then how can you support the Arizona republicans in blocking this information. How can you support an audit that is biased and so poorly conceived.
Recounts are done with both parties present and no party is barred. Federal and state officials can be there
A recount is, by definition, a count of every ballot with votes for the close contest. A ballot audit typically counts only a random sample of some of the ballots.
Thus basically people are counting on an audit which is a random sample of ballots and hanging their hats on that
Yet a recount results is ignored because it doesn't validate what they want to believe. 
