SavannahMann
Platinum Member
- Nov 16, 2016
- 14,540
- 6,819
- 365
Oh good. Another what are you afraid of thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kilroy2 why complain about the Cyber Ninjas when we should be complaining about those who ran the previous recounts and audits because they missed obvious fraud.
The only legit point in your post is the word verifiable.where is the proof of cheating ?
There is no verifiable proof of cheating to the level that it cost Trump the election.
There is only wishful thinking that they must have cheated.
Big difference
In fact the same system that won trump the election was used when he lost.
Yet rules for audits and recounts are set by the state government. They have verified the election to be accurate. The republican governor has not said anything to contradict that fact.
Yet republicans hired someone who has been vocal about election fraud to find election fraud. He sets up his own rules. Instead of hiring someone with experience and neutral in the matter. They hire the one who believes it to be true. He has to come up with something. Yet what he finds is debunked and explained that he has no experience.
Its like hiring the victim to investigate a crime that was committed against the victim.
We saw the election stolen on election night. We know that fraud happened. The people running the first recounts/audits failed to uncover the obvious fraud.Care to give an example of that statement that backs it up to be true?
We saw the election stolen on election night. We know that fraud happened. The people running the first recounts/audits failed to uncover the obvious fraud.
Yet you still do not provide any instances of mail in votes being fraudulent to the point that it would have cost Trump the election.The only legit point in your post is the word verifiable.
That’s how no-excuse mail-ins worked for the obvious cheating that allowed the loser tandem to assume the office.
We saw the election stolen on election night. We know that fraud happened. The people running the first recounts/audits failed to uncover the obvious fraud.
60% of Biden votes were mail-ins. Mail-ins are largely unaccountable. This is obviously way more than any typical random cheating.Yet you still do not provide any instances of mail in votes being fraudulent to the point that it would have cost Trump the election.
You say "no excuse mail in work for obvious cheating" yet you fail to put it in prospective. Does cheating happen yes and they will get caught. You seem to say cheating happens but can you prove that it cost Trump the election.
Even when Trump won an election there is a probability that someone cheated but the one test is does it change the outcome of the election.
Your points are akin to saying people commit crimes therefore people are all criminals.
Provide proof that the mail in vote is cheating and that it cost trump the election.
Now remember just because you say it so with no proof is not proof that Trump lost the election. The proof that Trump lost the election is he is no longer the president.
Those who say Trump is still my president is cute but it delusional at the same time.
They seem to be afraid something will be uncovered.
---Based on the above and other “anomalies and evidence,” including from a USPS whistleblower, as well as direct observation of the in-process Arizona audit, on 7 July, State Sen. Doug Mastriano (R) announced a full forensic audit in three counties in Pennsylvania---
60% of Biden votes were mail-ins. Mail-ins are largely unaccountable. This is obviously way more than any typical random cheating.
This is election theft and the undermining of our democratic system.
This is not the last we’ve heard of demmunist cheating. This is only the beginning. If they get away with it now it will only continue and snowball. Like appeasing terrorists.
There is way more obvious fraud in the 2020 election than is even questionable. No comparison at all to typical levels of election fraud.
A dem tandem of rejects breaking a vote record by 17%? While 60% of their votes were from highly manipulatable mail-in votes?
Elephant in the room.
How could ou possibly know with certainty it was mail in votes were rigged?I think they need to be allowed to finish and extra scrutiny of tracing mail-ins back to legit voters is most important.
This election was stolen by mail-ins. Another way dems used the virus to remove trump. Which was the reason for china’s bio attack in the first place.
Trump won the Presidency! by far
The scum on the Left stole it from him.
These thieves should be in jail - if lucky - or shot at dawn id there is any justice left in America!
The evidence of the election being stolen is overwhelming.
Kilroy2 why complain about the Cyber Ninjas when we should be complaining about those who ran the previous recounts and audits because they missed obvious fraud.
There was no obvious fraud. Trump's AG said so and Trump lawyers said so.
Any arrests yet?Probably why they fear the AZ audit and a probable Georgia audit.
Their Senile Pedo POTUS would be found to be illegitimate. ..cant win with less than 270 electoral votes
You seem to enjoy it Stepford
60% of Biden votes were mail-ins. Mail-ins are largely unaccountable. This is obviously way more than any typical random cheating.
This is election theft and the undermining of our democratic system.
This is not the last we’ve heard of demmunist cheating. This is only the beginning. If they get away with it now it will only continue and snowball. Like appeasing terrorists.
Area type | |||
---|---|---|---|
Region | |||
Issue regarded as most important | |||
Military service | |||
Union households | |||
Income | |||
Education by race/gender | |||
Education by race | |||
Education | |||
First time voter | |||
Sexual orientation | |||
Age by race | |||
Age | |||
White evangelical or born-again Christian | |||
Religion | |||
Gender by race/ethnicity | |||
Race/ethnicity | |||
Gender by marital status | |||
Marital status | |||
Gender | |||
Party | |||
Ideology | |||
Demographic subgroup | Biden | Trump | % of total vote |
Total vote | 51 | 47 | 100 |
Liberals | 89 | 10 | 24 |
Moderates | 64 | 34 | 38 |
Conservatives | 14 | 85 | 38 |
Democrats | 94 | 5 | 37 |
Republicans | 6 | 94 | 36 |
Independents | 54 | 42 | 26 |
Men | 45 | 53 | 48 |
Women | 57 | 42 | 52 |
Married | 45 | 53 | 56 |
Unmarried | 58 | 40 | 44 |
Married men | 43 | 55 | 30 |
Married women | 48 | 51 | 26 |
Unmarried men | 52 | 45 | 20 |
Unmarried women | 62 | 36 | 23 |
White | 41 | 57 | 67 |
Black | 87 | 12 | 13 |
Latino | 65 | 33 | 13 |
Asian | 63 | 36 | 4 |
Other | 55 | 41 | 4 |
White men | 38 | 60 | 35 |
White women | 44 | 55 | 32 |
Black men | 79 | 19 | 4 |
Black women | 90 | 9 | 8 |
Latino men | 59 | 37 | 5 |
Latino women | 69 | 30 | 8 |
Other | 59 | 38 | 8 |
Protestant/Other Christian | 39 | 60 | 43 |
Catholic | 52 | 47 | 25 |
Jewish | 76 | 22 | 2 |
Other religion | 69 | 29 | 8 |
None | 65 | 31 | 22 |
Yes | 24 | 76 | 28 |
No | 62 | 36 | 72 |
18–24 years old | 65 | 31 | 9 |
25–29 years old | 54 | 43 | 7 |
30–39 years old | 51 | 46 | 16 |
40–49 years old | 54 | 44 | 16 |
50–64 years old | 47 | 52 | 30 |
65 and older | 47 | 52 | 22 |
White 18–29 years old | 44 | 53 | 8 |
White 30–44 years old | 41 | 57 | 14 |
White 45–59 years old | 38 | 61 | 19 |
White 60 and older | 42 | 57 | 26 |
Black 18–29 years old | 88 | 10 | 3 |
Black 30–44 years old | 78 | 19 | 4 |
Black 45–59 years old | 89 | 10 | 3 |
Black 60 and older | 92 | 7 | 3 |
Latino 18–29 years old | 69 | 28 | 4 |
Latino 30–44 years old | 62 | 34 | 4 |
Latino 45–59 years old | 68 | 30 | 3 |
Latino 60 and older | 58 | 40 | 2 |
Others | 59 | 38 | 8 |
LGBT | 67 | 30 | 7 |
Non-LGBT | 51 | 48 | 93 |
Yes | 64 | 32 | 14 |
No | 49 | 49 | 86 |
High school or less | 46 | 54 | 19 |
Some college education | 51 | 47 | 23 |
Associate degree | 47 | 50 | 16 |
Bachelor's degree | 51 | 47 | 27 |
Postgraduate degree | 62 | 37 | 15 |
White college graduates | 51 | 47 | 32 |
White no college degree | 32 | 67 | 35 |
Non-white college graduates | 70 | 27 | 10 |
Non-white no college degree | 72 | 26 | 24 |
White women with college degrees | 54 | 44 | 14 |
White women without college degrees | 36 | 63 | 17 |
White men with college degrees | 48 | 50 | 17 |
White men without college degrees | 28 | 70 | 18 |
Non-White | 71 | 26 | 33 |
Under $30,000 | 54 | 46 | 15 |
$30,000–49,999 | 56 | 44 | 20 |
$50,000–99,999 | 56 | 42 | 39 |
$100,000–199,999 | 41 | 58 | 20 |
Over $200,000 | 48 | 48 | 7 |
Yes | 56 | 40 | 20 |
No | 50 | 49 | 80 |
Veterans | 44 | 54 | 15 |
Non-veterans | 53 | 45 | 85 |
Racial inequality | 92 | 7 | 20 |
COVID-19 pandemic | 81 | 15 | 17 |
Economy | 16 | 83 | 35 |
Crime and safety | 27 | 71 | 11 |
Health care | 62 | 37 | 11 |
East | 58 | 40 | 20 |
Midwest | 47 | 51 | 23 |
South | 46 | 53 | 35 |
West | 57 | 41 | 22 |
Urban | 60 | 38 | 29 |
Suburban | 50 | 48 | 51 |
Rural | 42 | 57 | 19 |