Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Which county did Trump win in of the three?They seem to be afraid something will be uncovered.
---Based on the above and other “anomalies and evidence,” including from a USPS whistleblower, as well as direct observation of the in-process Arizona audit, on 7 July, State Sen. Doug Mastriano (R) announced a full forensic audit in three counties in Pennsylvania---
where is the proof of cheating ?
There is no verifiable proof of cheating to the level that it cost Trump the election.
There is only wishful thinking that they must have cheated.
Big difference
In fact the same system that won trump the election was used when he lost.
Yet rules for audits and recounts are set by the state government. They have verified the election to be accurate. The republican governor has not said anything to contradict that fact.
Yet republicans hired someone who has been vocal about election fraud to find election fraud. He sets up his own rules. Instead of hiring someone with experience and neutral in the matter. They hire the one who believes it to be true. He has to come up with something. Yet what he finds is debunked and explained that he has no experience.
Its like hiring the victim to investigate a crime that was committed against the victim.
That's why we need more audits.where is the proof of cheating ?
Did you oppose or support the investigation into Trumps collusion with russia? Just curiousThey seem to be afraid something will be uncovered.
---Based on the above and other “anomalies and evidence,” including from a USPS whistleblower, as well as direct observation of the in-process Arizona audit, on 7 July, State Sen. Doug Mastriano (R) announced a full forensic audit in three counties in Pennsylvania---
Why would there need to be an investigation? The media raised a stink about a meeting between his son and Russian officials, but that meeting was about adoption policy so there was nothing wrong with it.Did you oppose or support the investigation into Trumps collusion with russia? Just curious
Is that a No, you didn’t support the investigation? Direct answers please, let’s not play the round about gameWhy would there need to be an investigation? The media raised a stink about a meeting between his son and Russian officials, but that meeting was about adoption policy so there was nothing wrong with it.
So, you offer no proof that there was no cheating, just announce that everyone's suspicions are wrong as if that closes the matter. And, because you announce that there was no cheating, you expect that there should be no independent investigation. And you expect to be taken seriously? Go away
But fraudulent ballots are not supposed to be counted.A recount is, by definition, a count of every ballot with votes for the close contest.
It's unfortunate that the trump Nazis project their own irrational thought processes onto progressives and anyone else with opposing views.They seem to be afraid something will be uncovered.
---Based on the above and other “anomalies and evidence,” including from a USPS whistleblower, as well as direct observation of the in-process Arizona audit, on 7 July, State Sen. Doug Mastriano (R) announced a full forensic audit in three counties in Pennsylvania---
Except when they’re for a democrat.But fraudulent ballots are not supposed to be counted.
This is a lie – they don’t.Why Do Democrats Fear a Forensic Audit in Pennsylvania?
In right-wing fantasy, you are Always Right.They seem to be afraid something will be uncovered.
---Based on the above and other “anomalies and evidence,” including from a USPS whistleblower, as well as direct observation of the in-process Arizona audit, on 7 July, State Sen. Doug Mastriano (R) announced a full forensic audit in three counties in Pennsylvania---
Conduct your idiotic fraudit if you want; nothing will come of it – it will only work to the political advantage of Democrats.The evidence of the election being stolen is overwhelming.
This is a lie.We saw the election stolen on election night.
Only Russian tools say that.We saw the election stolen on election night. We know that fraud happened. The people running the first recounts/audits failed to uncover the obvious fraud.
If you and your democrat ilk had demanded that kind of oversight of the electionI am a Democrat but I would personally love to see one. Provided that the scam audit in Arizona isn't used as a model.
We would need clear oversight, and a third party and control neither party would be allowed to make any decisions or have direct unsupervised access to any ballots voting machines or any thing else.
And the third party in charge has to be actually certified and trained in elections sudits. You know the complete opposite of the Cyber ninjas.
If you and your democrat ilk had demanded that kind of oversight of the election
Itself then an audit would be moot.
