Why did Fauci denounce Hydroxychloroquine?

r
Well if democrat governors didn't put covid positive people into nursing homes. The count would be thousands less. I rode around in a truck all day with a buddy that tested positive for covid. Didn't get shit, I did quarantine for the rest of the time needed after I found out.
Where are we going to put them? Your house?
retard you dont put people with a virus in the same place as those most likely to DIE from said virus live.

And yet New York had the same level of deaths in nursing homes as Florida. You would think that Florida would’ve had a much lower rate.

In fact even with the adjusted numbers, New York is about average in total nursing home deaths during the pandemic
Florida has 40% more residents in nursing homes than NY, Dumbass.
 
Remarkable efficacy was shown in risk stratified patients who began treatment soon after diagnosis compared to public reference patients treated conventionally.
Just a bit ago you claimed they didn’t compare them at all. I’m not sure you understand this paper well.
To deny this is stupid. As the authors declared more study of this is urgently needed. But to declare it invalid is simply not scientific or smart.
There’s a term called garbage in, garbage out. The paper is founded on garbage and therefore the results are likewise garbage.
I did not claim the paper "didn't compare them at all". Stop misquoting me. I said they didn't use "comparison group" as a term as you claimed.

You post so many inaccuracies about the substance of the paper as well as my own posts. That tells me you are dishonest and I don't post to dishonest posters.

Gooooood bye, dishonest poster. I learn something new every day.
Right here I bolded where you said that.
Yes, but calling them a "comparison group" is inaccurate. They never compared the two groups, which you keep claiming as your sole reason for throwing the study out.
You really don’t seem to understand the paper at all because you basically immediately contradicted yourself. I’m not being dishonest about the paper, I’m being accurate. It only seems dishonest because you really don’t understand the issues here.

You left out the rest of my post. Since you're so dishonest I don't have to wonder why.

They compared the results of using 2 drugs and 1 supplement in a risk stratified (aka much more vulnerable than the average) treatment group to a public reference control group.

What I meant when I said they didn't compare the two groups was demographically and medical history. Its pretty obvious if you read the entire post.

I understand the study just fine. Its you who has difficulty understanding that every member of the the risk stratified group carried at least one, most likely several potential comorbidities.

Ya think every member of the public reference control group did?

They weighted the study to favor the public reference control group and still the drugs and zinc excelled.
I did read the entire post, and that's why I said you basically immediately contradicted yourself.

Because you said the NEVER compared them, except that they did compare them. You say they weren't a comparison group, but admit they made a comparison. You are constantly contradicting yourself and I don't understand why you don't realize this.

What do we know about the member of the public reference "control group"? We know nothing. We don't even know the source of the information. That's a HUGE problem for a study that wants to compare the efficacy of a drug. So yeah, the public reference group could have been people who were FAR more likely to have severe effects from COVID. We just don't know. And unless we know, no conclusions can be made.
 
Right after you conduct your own randomized trial, Dumbass.
I don’t have to. Others did and the results were negative.
And others did and the results were positive.
I’ve not seen any randomized clinical trials with a positive result. Can you share the citation?
You have been shown studies already. Your handlers have told you to dismiss them with no factual basis to do so.

No reason to show you what you have already been show.
 
Right after you conduct your own randomized trial, Dumbass.
I don’t have to. Others did and the results were negative.
And others did and the results were positive.
I’ve not seen any randomized clinical trials with a positive result. Can you share the citation?
You have been shown studies already. Your handlers have told you to dismiss them with no factual basis to do so.

No reason to show you what you have already been show.
Zero studies that have been presented are randomized clinical trials.

Do you even know what that is?
 
Right after you conduct your own randomized trial, Dumbass.
I don’t have to. Others did and the results were negative.
And others did and the results were positive.
I’ve not seen any randomized clinical trials with a positive result. Can you share the citation?
You have been shown studies already. Your handlers have told you to dismiss them with no factual basis to do so.

No reason to show you what you have already been show.
Zero studies that have been presented are randomized clinical trials.

Do you even know what that is?
See.
 
Right after you conduct your own randomized trial, Dumbass.
I don’t have to. Others did and the results were negative.
And others did and the results were positive.
I’ve not seen any randomized clinical trials with a positive result. Can you share the citation?
You have been shown studies already. Your handlers have told you to dismiss them with no factual basis to do so.

No reason to show you what you have already been show.
Zero studies that have been presented are randomized clinical trials.

Do you even know what that is?
See.
I can’t dismiss what doesn’t exist.

You don’t actually know what we are talking about, do you? It’s okay to admit it. I’d actually think better of you if you did.
 
Right after you conduct your own randomized trial, Dumbass.
I don’t have to. Others did and the results were negative.
And others did and the results were positive.
I’ve not seen any randomized clinical trials with a positive result. Can you share the citation?
You have been shown studies already. Your handlers have told you to dismiss them with no factual basis to do so.

No reason to show you what you have already been show.
Zero studies that have been presented are randomized clinical trials.

Do you even know what that is?
See.
I can’t dismiss what doesn’t exist.

You don’t actually know what we are talking about, do you? It’s okay to admit it. I’d actually think better of you if you did.
Your handlers are proud of you.
 
Right after you conduct your own randomized trial, Dumbass.
I don’t have to. Others did and the results were negative.
And others did and the results were positive.
I’ve not seen any randomized clinical trials with a positive result. Can you share the citation?
You have been shown studies already. Your handlers have told you to dismiss them with no factual basis to do so.

No reason to show you what you have already been show.
Zero studies that have been presented are randomized clinical trials.

Do you even know what that is?
See.
I can’t dismiss what doesn’t exist.

You don’t actually know what we are talking about, do you? It’s okay to admit it. I’d actually think better of you if you did.
Your handlers are proud of you.
How so?
 
Nope, Trump most certainly did not prolong it here.
100% wrong, and nobody outside the Trump cult agrees with this desperate mop up job after the fact.Trump's presidency and behavior will be taught in classrooms as a case study of the worst case scenario of incompetent, immoral leadership during a crisis.
 
Right after you conduct your own randomized trial, Dumbass.
I don’t have to. Others did and the results were negative.
And others did and the results were positive.
I’ve not seen any randomized clinical trials with a positive result. Can you share the citation?

That is because randomized clinical trials are never going to give useful result when something is only good for treating a very small specific group of patients.
The reverse correlations of Lupus patients who were taking HCL showed a huge reduction in cytokine storm symptoms.
This is well known and proven fact.
But Lupus patients are the people with the compromised immune system who are most likely to die from covid-19, and not just random people who are all likely to be asymptomatic anyway.
Get the point?
 
Nope, Trump most certainly did not prolong it here.
100% wrong, and nobody outside the Trump cult agrees with this desperate mop up job after the fact.Trump's presidency and behavior will be taught in classrooms as a case study of the worst case scenario of incompetent, immoral leadership during a crisis.

Sorry, I do not like Trump, but you are wrong on this.
Trump was consistently right about covid-19 and Fauci was consistently wrong.

Quinine and its synthetics are given to people with compromised, over active, immune systems, like Lupus.
And it works.
The Lupus patients under quinine treatment had far less deadly cytokine storm reactions than those not taking quinine.

And "flattening the curve" was a ridiculously stupid strategy that prevented the epidemic from ending, so murdered half a million people.
 
Right after you conduct your own randomized trial, Dumbass.
I don’t have to. Others did and the results were negative.
And others did and the results were positive.
I’ve not seen any randomized clinical trials with a positive result. Can you share the citation?

That is because randomized clinical trials are never going to give useful result when something is only good for treating a very small specific group of patients.
The reverse correlations of Lupus patients who were taking HCL showed a huge reduction in cytokine storm symptoms.
This is well known and proven fact.
But Lupus patients are the people with the compromised immune system who are most likely to die from covid-19, and not just random people who are all likely to be asymptomatic anyway.
Get the point?
Yeah, saying it’s just for a really small and specific group of patients seems to be just more excuse making. Like, trying some way to still believe that it’s effective without being burdened with having to show good evidence of its efficacy.

Trials were done in all sorts of patient populations. It never worked out.

Your statement about lupus patients is confusing. Can you restate?
 
15th post
Because it doesn’t ******* WORK on COVID that’s why.
Ron DeSantis bought a million doses though.
So if there’s ever a Malaria outbreak in Florida, he’ll be prepared! :lol:

 
A speedy solution would have interfered with the primary agenda of unseating Trump
 
A speedy solution would have interfered with the primary agenda of unseating Trump
And yet that's exactly what happened, with the vaccines. Enjoy your alternate reality.
Reality is the vaccines occurred way after election was completed thus primary agenda succeeded. That’s the reality. Have your adult supervisors told you how you are feeling today and what sentiments you are permitted to share?
 
Back
Top Bottom