Why are there not democrats on Mount Rushmore?

[Polishprince]

Known informally as the Jeffersonian Republicans, this group of politicians organized in opposition to the policies of Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton, who favored a strong central government.

Republican leader Thomas Jefferson won election to the presidency in 1800. This Republican party, which would hold power until 1825, is the direct ancestor of today's Democratic Party.

The Federalist and the Republican Party | American Experience | PBS

Learn more about the Federalist Party and the Republican Party.

www.pbs.org

Jefferson was the first Democrat president.

Jefferson was a slave owner whose statue will be dumped into the Tidal Basin soon enough, and the memorial rededicated as the Joseph Rosenbaum Memorial one they cast a statue of that liberal hero.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Jefferson was a slave owner whose statue will be dumped into the Tidal Basin soon enough, and the memorial rededicated as the Joseph Rosenbaum Memorial one they cast a statue of that liberal hero.

It figures you would consider a convicted pervert a liberal hero, says a lot. S dam glad I am not a scum lib.

 

[toobfreak]

Lincoln was a Democrat in practice in every sense.

So Lincoln was killed by his own Confederate Slave Owning Democrats?

Jefferson was a Democrat literally.

Didn't Jefferson own 600 slaves and rape a 14 year old slave? Is this the typical democrat?

Washington was neither, and warned about the dangers of political parties.

Yes, parties are so dangerous. We need an autocrat!

What there isn't on Mt. Rushmore is one single conservative.

What there isn't on Mt. Rushmore is a single progressive that would condone what the democrat party is doing today, but whom would all fully endorse Trump's America First.

 

[francoHFW]

Kevin Sorbo wonders why there are no Democrats on Mount Rushmore, Internet answers

Former “Hercules” star Kevin Sorbo noted over Thanksgiving weekend that Mount Rushmore features no Democrats. Though the 63-year-old actor is technically not wrong, his name began trending on Twitter Monday as the Internet offered a bit of context. “Ever wonder why there are no democrats on...

www.yahoo.com

Why only Republicans?

Hilarious!

Bologna. But they are all liberals and Jefferson started the Democrats.

 

[francoHFW]

So Lincoln was killed by his own Confederate Slave Owning Democrats?


Didn't Jefferson own 600 slaves and rape a 14 year old slave? Is this the typical democrat?


Yes, parties are so dangerous. We need an autocrat!


What there isn't on Mt. Rushmore is a single progressive that would condone what the democrat party is doing today, but whom would all fully endorse Trump's America First.

Actually They are all liberals who would detest Trump and the mis information and racism that makes him possible.

 

[francoHFW]

It figures you would consider a convicted pervert a liberal hero, says a lot. S dam glad I am not a scum lib.

Who Is a convicted pervert now, brainwashed functional moron lol?

 

[JusticeHammer]

Actually They are all liberals who would detest Trump and the mis information and racism that makes him possible.

You're full of shit.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Who Is a convicted pervert now, brainwashed functional moron lol?

Rosenbaum, convicted for sexual misconduct of five teenage boys. He spent time for it starting at age 18. If you were smart enough you would possibly research before your lies make you look stupid.

 

[toobfreak]

Actually They are all liberals who would detest Trump and the mis information and racism that makes him possible.

So they are all slave owners who would have detested slavery?

No, no, Frank, they were all slave owners who just detested racism.

There was no racism ever in Trump's platform. Just the leftwing media's gaslit claims of it. Meantime, you democrats WIDELY practice racism every single day.

NOT ONE PRESIDENT on Mt. Rushmore would condone stealing an election just to win. Not one of them would condone the vilification of half the country. Not one of them would condone arming foreign terrorists, or leaving hundreds of Americans stranded in a hostile foreign country. Not one of them would condone staging troops in the Capitol banning the citizenry because its leaders so feared retaliation for the heinous things they did.

NOT ONE PRESIDENT on Mt. Rushmore would condone the silencing and oppression of the free speech of the people much less the President himself, not one of those presidents would put up with hundreds of race riots in 500 cities or the seizing of city blocks and the destruction of police stations and the looting of businesses. Not one would accept the kowtowing of America to her enemies, the trampling of human rights or painting BLM in the streets to placate rascals. Not one would accept wide open borders with millions of unvetted aliens illegally flooding into our borders. And not one of them would condone using the media to promote lies while spending thousands of billions of dollars it did not have borrowing from enemies to advance a social agenda contrary to the free enterprise of our own citizenry.

EVERY SINGLE LAST ONE OF THEM would love Trump's America First of making America stronger, safer, more prosperous and freer.

 

[JusticeHammer]

So they are all slave owners who would have detested slavery?

No, no, Frank, they were all slave owners who just detested racism.

There was no racism ever in Trump's platform. Just the leftwing media's gaslit claims of it. Meantime, you democrats WIDELY practice racism every single day.

NOT ONE PRESIDENT on Mt. Rushmore would condone stealing an election just to win. Not one of them would condone the vilification of half the country. Not one of them would condone arming foreign terrorists, or leaving hundreds of Americans stranded in a hostile foreign country. Not one of them would condone staging troops in the Capitol banning the citizenry because its leaders so feared retaliation for the heinous things they did.

NOT ONE PRESIDENT on Mt. Rushmore would condone the silencing and oppression of the free speech of the people much less the President himself, not one of those presidents would put up with hundreds of race riots in 500 cities or the seizing of city blocks and the destruction of police stations and the looting of businesses. Not one would accept the kowtowing of America to her enemies, the trampling of human rights or painting BLM in the streets to placate rascals. Not one would accept wide open borders with millions of unvetted aliens illegally flooding into our borders. And not one of them would condone using the media to promote lies while spending thousands of billions of dollars it did not have borrowing from enemies to advance a social agenda contrary to the free enterprise of our own citizenry.

EVERY SINGLE LAST ONE OF THEM would love Trump's America First of making America stronger, safer, more prosperous and freer.

Yep

 

[francoHFW]

So they are all slave owners who would have detested slavery?

No, no, Frank, they were all slave owners who just detested racism.

There was no racism ever in Trump's platform. Just the leftwing media's gaslit claims of it. Meantime, you democrats WIDELY practice racism every single day.

NOT ONE PRESIDENT on Mt. Rushmore would condone stealing an election just to win. Not one of them would condone the vilification of half the country. Not one of them would condone arming foreign terrorists, or leaving hundreds of Americans stranded in a hostile foreign country. Not one of them would condone staging troops in the Capitol banning the citizenry because its leaders so feared retaliation for the heinous things they did.

NOT ONE PRESIDENT on Mt. Rushmore would condone the silencing and oppression of the free speech of the people much less the President himself, not one of those presidents would put up with hundreds of race riots in 500 cities or the seizing of city blocks and the destruction of police stations and the looting of businesses. Not one would accept the kowtowing of America to her enemies, the trampling of human rights or painting BLM in the streets to placate rascals. Not one would accept wide open borders with millions of unvetted aliens illegally flooding into our borders. And not one of them would condone using the media to promote lies while spending thousands of billions of dollars it did not have borrowing from enemies to advance a social agenda contrary to the free enterprise of our own citizenry.

EVERY SINGLE LAST ONE OF THEM would love Trump's Americ GOP propaganda is the worst thing that has ever happened to this country and produces zombies like you. Change the channel.a First of making America stronger, safer, more prosperous and freer.

Like I said, horrible GOP misinformation and hate. Change the channel

 

[toobfreak]

Like I said, horrible GOP misinformation and hate.

You must mean like when the Jews announced that Hitler really wanted to gas all the Jews! Oh that horrible hate and misinformation from the Chosen People! You gaslighting fuck.

You can't point out one element of hate nor misinformation in a single thing I said.

 

[francoHFW]

View attachment 569928

You must mean like when the Jews announced that Hitler really wanted to gas all the Jews! Oh that horrible hate and misinformation from the Chosen People! You gaslighting fuck.

You can't point out one element of hate nor misinformation in a single thing I said.

There Is absolutely no evidence the election was stolen. not a single vote even. The Trump lawyers brought 62 suits and everyone was laughed out of court. Some lawyers are being disbarred for total baloney lol. And that is the worst thing anybody ever said about American democracy, no wonder you hate people who stole the election. My ass!!

 

[Kondor3]

hhhahaha the parties never flipped

I realize that The Truth hurts but automatic gainsay is not an adequate counterpoint... or did you flunk 5th-grade debate-club?

 

[Resnic]

If a democrat had done something great for America when founding the country then one would be on there. But none did so, there you have it. The answer is simple, there wasn't one that deserved to be on there.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Kevin Sorbo wonders why there are no Democrats on Mount Rushmore, Internet answers

Former “Hercules” star Kevin Sorbo noted over Thanksgiving weekend that Mount Rushmore features no Democrats. Though the 63-year-old actor is technically not wrong, his name began trending on Twitter Monday as the Internet offered a bit of context. “Ever wonder why there are no democrats on...

www.yahoo.com

Why only Republicans?

Hilarious!

George Washington was a Repub?

You sure about that?

 

[struth]

I realize that The Truth hurts but automatic gainsay is not an adequate counterpoint... or did you flunk 5th-grade debate-club?

Oh we are debating? hahaha

The parties never flipped. The left has always been about centralized power in the few (Govt, or plantation owner), and a dependent class. They have always used scapegoats, race, wealth, religion, vaccine status, whatever to divide people, and look to the "other" to blame. This isn't a uniquely American leftist thing, but a leftist philsophy across the globe.

 

[Kondor3]

Oh we are debating? hahaha

No. I doubt you have it in you.

The parties never flipped.

Automatic gainsay will get you nowhere.

The left has always been about centralized power in the few (Govt, or plantation owner), and a dependent class.

Which is why, of course, Southern Democrats seceded from the Union in 1860-1861...

They have always used scapegoats, race, wealth, religion, vaccine status, whatever to divide people, and look to the "other" to blame.

The idiot Dems are, indeed, guilty of much of this, but we weren't discussing that... we were discussing historical Party-of-the-Common-Man perceptions, and pole-flipping.

This isn't a uniquely American leftist thing, but a leftist philsophy across the globe.

Incorrect. Leftists use race to divide-and-conquer at the polls. Right-wing fascists use race as a cover for their power-grabs.

 

[struth]

No. I doubt you have it in you.

Automatic gainsay will get you nowhere.

Which is why, of course, Southern Democrats seceded from the Union in 1860-1861...

The idiot Dems are, indeed, guilty of much of this, but we weren't discussing that... we were discussing historical Party-of-the-Common-Man perceptions, and pole-flipping.

Incorrect. Leftists use race to divide-and-conquer at the polls. Right-wing fascists use race as a cover for their power-grabs.

You can't be the party of the common man, when all you want to do is make the common man dependent on your party.

Sorry

 

[toobfreak]

There Is absolutely no evidence the election was stolen. not a single vote even.

Wouldn't want to bet your life on that, would you? I just heard Lindell's attorney detailing the case before the Supreme Court right now and all the laws broken, election records illegally destroyed AFTER they were subpoenaed, while you shitheads tried to stop the subpoenas (unsuccessfully). Getting closer and closer to nailing you fuckers to the wall. Can't wait.