Democrats May Have Found A New Way To Rig Elections

[Independent thinker]

If you lose, just simply have a new election immediately without having to wait until the next election. That's right folks. California democrats made a convoluded system designed to rig elections in their favor by having one open primary for all parties and the two top vote getters go on to the general election in November. Since it is a highly voting blue state this voting method was designed to get two democrats to the general election in November and exclude any other party from that vote.

But, oops, this year the top two vote getters are both Republicans because there are several democrats deluting the democrat votes to the point they may be out of the picture and allowing the top two vote getters, both Republicans, competing in the November general election, assuring that a Republican would be the next governor and not a democrat.

Not to worry though, democrats have a plan in case that happens and a Republican becomes governor of their blue state. They could have an immediate recall and force another election, which would probably result in a Democrat winning the recall election. Why wait for the next election when you can create your own immediate next election now?

Lopez: Yes, a Republican could be California's next governor. And a recall would begin immediately

In one of the weirdest elections in California history, here's how it might all play out.

www.yahoo.com

 

[1srelluc]

I believe they will be more brazen than that and just change the law before the primary.

Just wait and see.

Hell, the vile dems disenfranchised 15 million Biden primary voters in favor of Harris at the drop of a hat so rigging a state election is small potatoes for their vile ilk.

 

[airplanemechanic]

I believe they will be more brazen than that and just change the law before the primary.

Just wait and see.

Hell, the vile dems disenfranchised 15 million Biden primary voters in favor of Harris at the drop of a hat so rigging a state election is small potatoes for their vile ilk.

But its the republicans that are a threat to democracy. Remember that.

 

[Independent thinker]

But its the republicans that are a threat to democracy. Remember that.

I learned a long time ago that people pointing their fingers at others were usually guilty themselves. It is a pyschological fact that when you accuse others of things you are often guilty yourself. It's a human behavior. And, looking back at all of the accusastions thrown out by democrats, the facts often prove that theory correct.

 

[Concerned American]

If you lose, just simply have a new election immediately without having to wait until the next election. That's right folks. California democrats made a convoluded system designed to rig elections in their favor by having one open primary for all parties and the two top vote getters go on to the general election in November. Since it is a highly voting blue state this voting method was designed to get two democrats to the general election in November and exclude any other party from that vote.

But, oops, this year the top two vote getters are both Republicans because there are several democrats deluting the democrat votes to the point they may be out of the picture and allowing the top two vote getters, both Republicans, competing in the November general election, assuring that a Republican would be the next governor and not a democrat.

Not to worry though, democrats have a plan in case that happens and a Republican becomes governor of their blue state. They could have an immediate recall and force another election, which would probably result in a Democrat winning the recall election. Why wait for the next election when you can create your own immediate next election now?

Lopez: Yes, a Republican could be California's next governor. And a recall would begin immediately

In one of the weirdest elections in California history, here's how it might all play out.

www.yahoo.com

Who knows in CA. They can change like the wind. They've had republican govs before--Reagan, Deukmejian, Wilson, Schwarzenegger and they've also had some whack job democrats. Even recalled one, Gray Davis. It is not unheard of there to have a gov. of one party and a lieutenant gov. of another.

 

[Dorian Mode]

But its the republicans that are a threat to democracy. Remember that.

When dumocraps say "Threat To Democracy" that is their Newspeak and is translated to "Threat To Dumocrap Rule." One person, one vote is immoral, racist and fascist to them. And not letting the dead continue to vote for dumocraps is discrimination against the dead and needs a new Identity Politics catch word for this.

 

[Independent thinker]

When dumocraps say "Threat To Democracy" that is their Newspeak and is translated to "Threat To Dumocrap Rule." One person, one vote is immoral, racist and fascist to them. And not letting the dead continue to vote for dumocraps is discrimination against the dead and needs a new Identity Politics catch word for this.

I have said many a time that they equate the terms democrat and democracy so, if you take democrats away, they think it means you have taken democracy away.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

If you lose, just simply have a new election immediately without having to wait until the next election. That's right folks. California democrats made a convoluded system designed to rig elections in their favor by having one open primary for all parties and the two top vote getters go on to the general election in November. Since it is a highly voting blue state this voting method was designed to get two democrats to the general election in November and exclude any other party from that vote.

But, oops, this year the top two vote getters are both Republicans because there are several democrats deluting the democrat votes to the point they may be out of the picture and allowing the top two vote getters, both Republicans, competing in the November general election, assuring that a Republican would be the next governor and not a democrat.

Not to worry though, democrats have a plan in case that happens and a Republican becomes governor of their blue state. They could have an immediate recall and force another election, which would probably result in a Democrat winning the recall election. Why wait for the next election when you can create your own immediate next election now?

Lopez: Yes, a Republican could be California's next governor. And a recall would begin immediately

In one of the weirdest elections in California history, here's how it might all play out.

www.yahoo.com

It's the Republicans who have initiated most of the recall attempts in California. They were successful with Gray Davis. They tried multiple times with Newsom.

 

[jacksonlamb]

If you lose, just simply have a new election immediately without having to wait until the next election. That's right folks. California democrats made a convoluded system designed to rig elections in their favor by having one open primary for all parties and the two top vote getters go on to the general election in November. Since it is a highly voting blue state this voting method was designed to get two democrats to the general election in November and exclude any other party from that vote.

But, oops, this year the top two vote getters are both Republicans because there are several democrats deluting the democrat votes to the point they may be out of the picture and allowing the top two vote getters, both Republicans, competing in the November general election, assuring that a Republican would be the next governor and not a democrat.

Not to worry though, democrats have a plan in case that happens and a Republican becomes governor of their blue state. They could have an immediate recall and force another election, which would probably result in a Democrat winning the recall election. Why wait for the next election when you can create your own immediate next election now?

Lopez: Yes, a Republican could be California's next governor. And a recall would begin immediately

In one of the weirdest elections in California history, here's how it might all play out.

www.yahoo.com

So you admit the system works fairly.

 

[Independent thinker]

It's the Republicans who have initiated most of the recall attempts in California. They were successful with Gray Davis. They tried multiple times with Newsom.

Except it was not planned ahead of time if the other side won.

 

[Lockback]

If you lose, just simply have a new election immediately without having to wait until the next election. That's right folks. California democrats made a convoluded system designed to rig elections in their favor by having one open primary for all parties and the two top vote getters go on to the general election in November. Since it is a highly voting blue state this voting method was designed to get two democrats to the general election in November and exclude any other party from that vote.

But, oops, this year the top two vote getters are both Republicans because there are several democrats deluting the democrat votes to the point they may be out of the picture and allowing the top two vote getters, both Republicans, competing in the November general election, assuring that a Republican would be the next governor and not a democrat.

Not to worry though, democrats have a plan in case that happens and a Republican becomes governor of their blue state. They could have an immediate recall and force another election, which would probably result in a Democrat winning the recall election. Why wait for the next election when you can create your own immediate next election now?

Lopez: Yes, a Republican could be California's next governor. And a recall would begin immediately

In one of the weirdest elections in California history, here's how it might all play out.

www.yahoo.com

It is a completely lawless party that should be ground into the pavement and set on fire.

 

[22lcidw]

It's the Republicans who have initiated most of the recall attempts in California. They were successful with Gray Davis. They tried multiple times with Newsom.

California should be a glossy jewel operating at peak efficiency. It is not. You have wasted a lot of wealth for political radicalism. The money wasted on the high speed train could have been used on roads, bridges and conventional trains. And that is just to start with your zany agendas.

 

[Independent thinker]

So you admit the system works fairly.

Typical lefty BS. It's only fair when you win. If the other side wins it's not fair.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Typical lefty BS. It's only fair when you win. If the other side wins it's not fair.

MAGA gas lighting above.

 

[toobfreak]

Not to worry though, democrats have a plan in case that happens and a Republican becomes governor of their blue state.

I believe the general thinking is along this path:

1. You declare the election illegal, fraudulent and void.
2. You declare the winner fraudulent, illegal and void.
3. You rig all of the voting machines.
4. You hire and pay legions of workers and voters who all work to skew the election in their favor.
5. You get Mark Zuckerberg to give you another 400 million to throw the election.
6. Then you stage some natural disaster, fire, flood, earthquake or whatever on election day to buy time, install new, special rules all in your favor, then print out millions of fraudulent ballots to be brought in at 4AM and counted by your "special" people while no one watches.

 

[Cassandro]

It's the Republicans who have initiated most of the recall attempts in California. They were successful with Gray Davis. They tried multiple times with Newsom.

How is that relevant to the OP?

 

[jacksonlamb]

If a GOP becomes governor, he will remain governor.

 

[airplanemechanic]

I learned a long time ago that people pointing their fingers at others were usually guilty themselves. It is a pyschological fact that when you accuse others of things you are often guilty yourself. It's a human behavior. And, looking back at all of the accusastions thrown out by democrats, the facts often prove that theory correct.

Yep, I heard an interview on TV about this one time. It had nothing to do with politics, it was I think on Court TV. It was talking about accusers accusing people of things that they didn't do, but that the accuser did. Why do they do this? Because in doing "whatever it is", they are comfortable with it, so they are comfortable accusing someone of it. It's basically much more comfy to accuse someone of doing something that you've done yourself, as you're familiar with it.

It was an interesting interview.

 

[Independent thinker]

If a GOP becomes governor, he will remain governor.

You need to reread the OP.

 

[Lockback]

You need to reread the OP.

I don't think reading is his forte'.