Why are the sorelosers demonstrating?

iydehan

Rookie
Joined
May 25, 2016
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
1
This was legal election. If there was something illegal let them make a complaint to the authorities.
 

HenryBHough

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
30,517
Reaction score
6,593
Points
1,140
Location
Oak Grove, Massachusetts
They're demonstrating because they want to do their Christmas looting early in most cases but, in a few, they're rushing to do it because they know that after the inauguration they'd be arrested, tried, convicted, become felons and never again be able to vote. C'mon JANUARY!
 

Alex.

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2014
Messages
9,894
Reaction score
4,963
Points
2,095
They did not get a trophy
 

Pete7469

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
23,862
Reaction score
8,741
Points
900
Location
The Real World
Because they're losers without real jobs and they're either on welfare or still cashing Soros checks.

"Proles...":biggrin:
 

Freewill

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
31,158
Reaction score
5,061
Points
1,130
They are protesting that their undies are in a knot. very annoying.
 

Rustic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
58,771
Reaction score
5,878
Points
1,940
Let's take this to the logical conclusion, these people don't like the way of an election went and/or a decision so they tear up their own shit in their own communities, does that make sense?
 

Pete7469

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
23,862
Reaction score
8,741
Points
900
Location
The Real World
They are protesting that their undies are in a knot. very annoying.

I do like your new avatar. Things are looking up aren't they?

I heard today they're going to try a moonbat "tea party".

They did that, sorta....

Occutards shitting on cop cars and trashing downtown areas didn't really advance the bed wetter agenda, but what the fuck, they had fun right? They'll have fun this time too and we'll kick their asses again so hard maybe they will all commit suicide or expatriate. I'll sell inner tubes on the beaches of the South Florida Keys for $50, then pay the Cubans who bring them back $10 and register them to vote.

 

Pete7469

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
23,862
Reaction score
8,741
Points
900
Location
The Real World
Let's take this to the logical conclusion, these people don't like the way of an election went and/or a decision so they tear up their own shit in their own communities, does that make sense?
Those parasites don't own any of that shit, if they even own anything more than a backpack and a bong.

 

Kat

Diamond Member
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
47,029
Reaction score
21,043
Points
2,645

Capstone

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
5,502
Reaction score
952
Points
290
For 112 years following the 1888 defeat of Grover Cleveland, every winning presidential candidate had gotten more votes than his opponents, which means the Electoral College merely ratified the popular vote throughout the 20th century. That streak was broken at the turn of the 21st century. Now 2 out of the last 5 presidential "elections" have given us a Republican president who lost the popular vote (Dubya with a deficit of around 500,000 votes and Trump, whose deficit is conservatively estimated to be somewhere between 1.5 and 2 million votes when it's all said and done). I say it's time to do away with the archaic Electoral College in favor of something that more closely resembles...oh, I dunno...democracy. :doubt:
 

Pete7469

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
23,862
Reaction score
8,741
Points
900
Location
The Real World
For 112 years following the 1888 defeat of Grover Cleveland, every winning presidential candidate had gotten more votes than his opponents, which means the Electoral College merely ratified the popular vote throughout the 20th century. That streak was broken at the turn of the 21st century. Now 2 out of the last 5 presidential "elections" have given us a Republican president who lost the popular vote (Dubya with a deficit of around 500,000 votes and Trump, whose deficit is conservatively estimated to be somewhere between 1.5 and 2 million votes when it's all said and done). I say it's time to do away with the archaic Electoral College in favor of something that more closely resembles...oh, I dunno...democracy. :doubt:
Lol...

%20 of democrook "votes" are dead people, ineligible felons and illegals.

 

Norman

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
31,256
Reaction score
15,066
Points
1,590
For 112 years following the 1888 defeat of Grover Cleveland, every winning presidential candidate had gotten more votes than his opponents, which means the Electoral College merely ratified the popular vote throughout the 20th century. That streak was broken at the turn of the 21st century. Now 2 out of the last 5 presidential "elections" have given us a Republican president who lost the popular vote (Dubya with a deficit of around 500,000 votes and Trump, whose deficit is conservatively estimated to be somewhere between 1.5 and 2 million votes when it's all said and done). I say it's time to do away with the archaic Electoral College in favor of something that more closely resembles...oh, I dunno...democracy. :doubt:
Lol...

%20 of democrook "votes" are dead people, ineligible felons and illegals.
Funny how he says that only because HIS candidate lost.

Turn the tables and he would be all for the electoral college.

Can't stand these hypocrites.
 

jillian

Princess
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
84,650
Reaction score
16,624
Points
2,220
Location
The Other Side of Paradise
This was legal election. If there was something illegal let them make a complaint to the authorities.
sore losers, dum dum? i'm pretty sure more of us voted against dumb donald than for him.

now be quiet and stop whining. that's all you loons did for eight years.... you don't change even when you run your scam successfully.

whining freaks.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top