What is their rationale? We have alcohol and nobody believes that should be illegal. If one is for freedom and liberty one is supportive of legalization.
Stick to marijuana as you're putting up a straw man. For one, marijuana has an impact on your health. Scientists are finding it causes changes in the brain that leads mental illness. This is demonstrable --
Cannabis Use Is Quantitatively Associated with Nucleus Accumbens and Amygdala Abnormalities in Young Adult Recreational Users. Also, children have ended up in the hospital due to accidental ingestion --
Legalized Marijuana Cookie Sends 2-Year-Old Girl To Hospital In Colorado. Finally, we are finding out that it is addictive. Oops, we were lied to by its advocates again --
Is Marijuana Addictive?. Also, read --
Is marijuana addictive? | Health Promotion | Brown University.
We should stop legalizing it for recreational use. I think medical marijuana is okay
Everything you do has an impact on your health
It's a personal choice and none of your business
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
That's just a straw man argument. Why don't you just man up and say if I fark myself in the head with marijuana, then it's on me. Or if I smoke it everyday and become addicted, then I can afford to get treatment. Just say I am a rich dude and can take care of myself.
Second, what do you mean it's none of my business? It becomes a burden to us taxpayers if people who are addicted or become mentally ill and can't afford to treat themselves. This was the problem that became a burden to society when alcohol was legalized. Thus, what it sounds like is legal marijuana will get even more expensive as we have to tax those people using it some more.
Just man up and say okay, I'll pay the freight.
I have supported myself since I was 17 and still do to this day even though I occasionally like to use hashish and have never been addicted to anything what I do has absolutely no effect on you.
And FYI I have always taken responsibility for my choices.
You do realize that using a little cannabis on occasion is not the same thing as being addicted to alcohol or opiates don't you?
Yes a small percentage of people who use drugs become addicted but that has been true for as long as people have been on the earth.
The so called war on drugs has cost you far more than my occasional hashish consumption ever will
The war on drugs will always be there because people cannot control their habits. It isn't just about physical addiction. We have gluttony which is people who cannot control their eating and drinking of alcohol. There is porn addiction and other things people do have self control over. Probably the worse imo is one who gets angry and cannot control their emotions.
Sounds like you're much younger than me. If you are 25, then I would be over twice as old. I used to do it when I was younger, but grown out of it. It isn't as addictive as cigarettes or alcohol, but if one uses it daily, then it could be addictive. I would say you would be getting psychologically addicted. The times have changed and it may be different now, but weed was always associated with drugs over 25 years ago.
In my experience, I think it leads to harder drugs because one was exposed to the culture more if you smoked. One could eat it and stuff, but mainly you shared it by smoking a joint. If you got together with friends or smaller group, then you could smoke a bong or water pipe, but the easiest was light up a joint or reefer stick. There were all kinds of associated paraphernalia and stuff to smoke it with and stuff you could use to decorate a room to enhance the experience. Sure, you add some music and something to blast it with. If you go to a party and people are lighting up, then there is usually somebody with coke or acid. You mentioned hashish and that and bennies were common. There was some opium-nated hash. So, I think the culture is a little different than someone who uses alcohol or opioids. I've gotten drunk plenty of times, but always have been able to control it. Opioids, I just try to stay away from because of its more addictive and physically addictive. Thus, you think you can control it, but once you stop is the true test whether you do have control over it or it has control over you. It may not be physical, but a psychological addiction.
I don't know if you read the link, but it stated:
"Is
marijuana addictive? Yes, but not in the way some might mean . . .
The question about whether or not marijuana is addictive comes in various forms. Will I experience physical withdrawal symptoms if I suddenly stop marijuana? Is there anything to the idea that I might be psychologically dependent on a drug? Could I quit if I wanted to?
It goes without saying that lots of people use marijuana. In 2009, marijuana was the primary drug of abuse for 61 percent of persons under 15, and marijuana was the primary drug of abuse for roughly 18 percent of people aged 12 or older who entered drug abuse treatment programs (1).
Marijuana is different from a lot of other drugs of abuse in that although there usually are some subtle physiological signs of withdrawal when a chronic user stops
smoking—mildly elevated pulse, irritability, and so on--these physical effects are generally fairly mild, and they are dramatically less obvious or powerful than those seen when a habitual user of
alcohol,
opiates (either heroin or any of the opioid pain pills), or
benzodiazepines (such as X*nax or Klonopin) abruptly ceases use. In these latter instances, individuals in withdrawal can
hallucinate, have greatly increased pulse and blood pressures, be visibly and dramatically uncomfortable, and in worst cases have seizures and even die.
Even though the physiological effects of cannabis withdrawal are generally mild, it is not correct to conclude that marijuana is not addictive, because being addicted to something is more than simply being physically dependent on a drug and experiencing physiological effects if the drug is stopped suddenly. “Addiction” refers to behaviors that are compulsive, partially out of control or worse, and often escalating in severity and intensity.
Given this definition of addiction, nobody should conclude that folks who are taking pain medications exactly as prescribed around the clock for legitimate health reasons--and are thus physiologically dependent on them--are addicted if they are taking their pills as prescribed, if they are not causing problems in the person’s life, if the individual is not engaging in dangerous behaviors in order to procure them, and if the use is not continually escalating to a point that is out of control."
Thus, it gets into a complex area. Many people will say what you just told me, but there is going to be a percentage that will not be able to exercise self control over it. It may not be alcohol or cigarette like, so I would not compare the different chemicals. A person who drinks daily may think they have their drinking under control and that may be correct, but they could let it get out of hand. However, as you know, it isn't the same with doing marijuana. MJ will have its own set of problems.
Thus, long story short, I'm discussing the percentage who will get addicted to marijuana and cause problems. I would think going to harder and more expensive drugs will cause problems, too. Then there are people who will light up in public, which is illegal, and people whose property they are doing it on do not like it and call the cops. They they have to come out to give them a ticket or escort them off the property. Some people will have low marijuana iq.