Happy New Year, Natural Citizen.Thank You, Meister!
Have a Wonderful New Year, all.
I'm going to the bar...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Happy New Year, Natural Citizen.Thank You, Meister!
Have a Wonderful New Year, all.
I'm going to the bar...
I was referencing it in terms of ''you support my position on performing a maude action with regard to this content I want to perform a maude action on and I'll support your maude action action with regard to that content that you want to perform a maude action on'' scenario
Because that's precisely how it goes down.
Pic?.
That how a silly girl with a pocketknife cleaning her fingernails rolls ...
.
.
It is too easy for the staff to assume you simply have an axe to grind ... Based in your own perceptions of fairness.
Often in these instances any logic you may provide, will be summarily ignored under the auspices of a personal conflict.
.
I noticed that the Sink Warrior is now closing threads (in the FZ, no less) and then clarifying the action by taking the initiative to state that ''I am locking as this attacks the few Democrats on this board as well''
The other reason was that ''This thread was reported''
Okay. Well he took the time to clarify to us all that his maude actions are in part because he personally feels that attacks on Democrats (again, in the FZ, no less) are a violation of some sort. Which must be a Sink Warrior modification/amendment to the rule book, I'm assuming, since I haven't seen an announcement made about that anywhere.
But..if a maude feels that it is necessary to invoke unsolicited clarification with regard to why he or she locked a thread in terms of how it affected his or her personal feelings, I, for one, would also expect clarification on what rule was actually broken, rather than just stating that performing a mod action was in part because "This thread was reported."
Are we closing threads (again, in the FZ, no less) merely because they were reported now?
Seems to me that some folks are getting a little too comfortable being unsupervised and attempts at setting some rather conflicting precedents are being made. Collectivist give and take in terms of what maude actions are taken with regard to what content specifically are not supervision, I'd add) That phenomenon is the root problem! It's why the inconsistency in enforcing the actual rules as they actually are, to favor twisting and bastardizing them in order to placate the feelings of peers in the office thrives.
He's a piss poor mod. Definitely an agenda
Well, that's resolved, so. I'm not gonna say anything else about it.
I do have to admit that I often find myself nonplussed at times by the fornicating national socialists who lack the intestinal fortitude nesessary to reveal themselves as the source of questionable censorship.
It has been noted here before, but I will reiterate it here again, for those who have forgotten.It allows the impression of a "United Front" in execution ... And is intentionally ambiguous.
It's the same as attempting to use the excuse of ... "The Mods are allowed to use their own discretion".
That in and itself ... Would speak nothing towards the integrity or worthiness of the Mod's discretion ...
And like the idea of actions taken by an unidentified moderator ...
Is simply a means by which to provide cover, ignore issues, and fail to provide anything of substance to the member ...
Dude I spent all day yesterday bringing a pistol to a carbine match, then recovering from bringing a pistol to a carbine match, and worrying about losing my hearing in one ear when a team mate's sbrHe's a piss poor mod. Definitely an agenda
Now, if you would prefer, you can get a warning and counseling with each and every bit of "censorship," but it will come attached with a warming point, message, and the entire staff will be called into a counseling session on each message, before your inevitable vacation comes due.
Bingo..
Not to suggest that what I would prefer is even an option to start with.
.
Me either, he gets butt hurt and my notifications go berserk
What has been seen cannot be unseen.
.
Coyote - extremist left.
Zincwarrior and Katsteve - solid left
You and flac - moderate to slightly right on some issues, somewhat left on others
Aye - mostly right.
Meister - solid right.
Dude I spent all day yesterday bringing a pistol to a carbine match, then recovering from bringing a pistol to a carbine match, and worrying about losing my hearing in one ear when a team mate's sbr
blew my hearing when I was running the timer. Other than enjoying arguing on the internet, that's my agenda.
I specifically noted in the comments other mods were free to open. So all I have to say is
Happy New Year Ya Bastads!
No one was talking to you.You take it too serious and when you get butthurt you act stupid.
I've made it clear, stop annoying me.and lose your infantile emoticon crap. So childish
No one was talking to you.