Who actually are the "the enemies within"? Is it the believers in Democracy or the believers in Dictatorships?

[Leo123]

Well, if you feel that way, you can no longer criticize anything done by BLM or any other group protesting in a violent way.

If you think that breaking into the Capitol violently is a nothing thing, the you have no respect for law and order, no respect for the Constitution and no respect for what our country has been during the past 248 years.

In addition, I have lost ALL respect for you. In my opinion, you are a total POS.

What BLM did was far worse. They burned a city, destroyed cop cars, destroyed a police headquarters, and people were killed. J6 was a walk in the park, by comparison you brainwashed, pearl-clutching zombie.

 

[Luckyone]

What BLM did was far worse. They burned a city, destroyed cop cars, destroyed a police headquarters, and people were killed. J6 was a walk in the park, by comparison you brainwashed, pearl-clutching zombie.

Hey and like Leo said, that was "nothing"

 

[g5000]

The "enemies within" is something that is happening everywhere in the world and it is evident that this is all based on whether you believe in Democracy or Dictatorship?

Definition of Democracy: A government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections.

Definition of Dictatorship: A dictatorship is a form of government characterized by the rule of one person or a small group of people who have no checks and balances on their power. While portrayed to their people as benevolent, loving rulers, dictators typically come to power simply to benefit themselves.
In addition, we see what Putin has accomplished in Russia with his 80% acceptance rate and we look at so many of the failures that have occurred through Democracy where the needs and desires of the people have not been met, and we see why Trump and the Dictatorship idea has taken such a strong hold.
We now see that the Constitution that are forefathers fought for when they were ruled by the King of England is been put aside. Are we ready to give up what we have been the representatives of during the past 248 years and go back to having a Dictator care for us?

So the question is: Who is now the enemy within? Is it MAGA, that believes one man (Trump) will do the best for all of us, or the Democratic Libertarians, that believe that the people should have a representative-of-the-people government.
It really does come down to the me, me, me or the us, us. us type of mentality as one thing that has been proven a thousand times before: ."While portrayed to their people as benevolent, loving rulers, dictators typically come to power simply to benefit themselves"

What is at stake is justice by and of the established laws, individual freedom, free speech, preventive regulations that protect us all from the rich and powerful taking advantage and using us.
.

We the People are no longer represented. Only the top one percent of the one percent is represented.

We need to fight to take that power back, and elitist billionaire orange Mussolini is not the one to do it.

If you think he is, I have a $25,000 watch to sell you.

 

[Leo123]

Hey and like Leo said, that was "nothing"

The BLM insurgency was worse as I have already proven.

 

[Luckyone]

The BLM insurgency was worse as I have already proven.

It was nothing......your words about the Jan 6th insurrection.

You don't get to call a violent act nothing but then call another violent act worse. That is what is called HYPOCRISY

 

[imawhosure]

It was nothing......your words about the Jan 6th insurrection.

You don't get to call a violent act nothing but then call another violent act worse. That is what is called HYPOCRISY

Dude/dudette, YOU are the enemy, and everyone knows it. You can add G5000, MACAFLOOZY, IM2, derBERGhoff, and a host of others. While we think all of your politics suck, we also know what you posted, lied about, and what your whole shtick is.

I have NEVER wanted to screw someone over for a political reason, ever. But you and your friends have earned the absolute right, to be the 1st!

I doubt Trump will do it, but if he does, if all of you get a little taste of your own medicine, it won't upset me at all..........as long as they do not do what your people did, and go....to.....damn....far!

 

[Luckyone]

Dude/dudette, YOU are the enemy, and everyone knows it. You can add G5000, MACAFLOOZY, IM2, derBERGhoff, and a host of others. While we think all of your politics suck, we also know what you posted, lied about, and what your whole shtick is.

I have NEVER wanted to screw someone over for a political reason, ever. But you and your friends have earned the absolute right, to be the 1st!

I doubt Trump will do it, but if he does, if all of you get a little taste of your own medicine, it won't upset me at all..........as long as they do not do what your people did, and go....to.....damn....far!

Pure an utter blindness-by-choice interpretation of the facts I have given. First of all, I NEVER LIE. I deal with and learn to cope with the truth. Lying means you run away from the truth. I give nothing but data, statistics and facts. If you do not see that, it is your problem.

 

[Contumacious]

The "enemies within" is something that is happening everywhere in the world and it is evident that this is all based on whether you believe in Democracy or Dictatorship?

Definition of Democracy: A government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections.

Definition of Dictatorship: A dictatorship is a form of government characterized by the rule of one person or a small group of people who have no checks and balances on their power. While portrayed to their people as benevolent, loving rulers, dictators typically come to power simply to benefit themselves.
In addition, we see what Putin has accomplished in Russia with his 80% acceptance rate and we look at so many of the failures that have occurred through Democracy where the needs and desires of the people have not been met, and we see why Trump and the Dictatorship idea has taken such a strong hold.
We now see that the Constitution that are forefathers fought for when they were ruled by the King of England is been put aside. Are we ready to give up what we have been the representatives of during the past 248 years and go back to having a Dictator care for us?

So the question is: Who is now the enemy within? Is it MAGA, that believes one man (Trump) will do the best for all of us, or the Democratic Libertarians, that believe that the people should have a representative-of-the-people government.
It really does come down to the me, me, me or the us, us. us type of mentality as one thing that has been proven a thousand times before: ."While portrayed to their people as benevolent, loving rulers, dictators typically come to power simply to benefit themselves"

What is at stake is justice by and of the established laws, individual freedom, free speech, preventive regulations that protect us all from the rich and powerful taking advantage and using us.
.

Who actually are the "the enemies within"? Is it the believers in Democracy or the believers in Dictatorships?

DOMESTIC ENEMIES

1- UNluckyone and his ilk :
2- Violent PARASITES who use SOCIALISM and the welfare state as tools to confiscatae and dictate
3- Enviro-Nazis who use the Green New Hoax as a tool to micromanage and destroy the economy and cause misery

They must be crushed like the motherfucking cockroaches they are


.

 

[ThisIsMe]

You need to show proof of your statements and even then, you need to prove your point regarding them trying to "skirt every chance they get". I have not found that to be true,

Look at ALL of the programs that democrats want. Free college, free Healthcare, housing subsidies, all these programs, while are great for humanity, are not the responsibility of the federal government. None of that power is given to them by the city's. Wealth tax is another. That violates the cotus equal protection, and proportional taxation clauses.

 

[ThisIsMe]

yes they do and if you AGREE to a true debate (following debate rules), I will GLADLY debate that issue with you.

What's to debate? Prices were low on food and gas, I paid less in taxes. Investments were going up. Those are the things I measure a good economy by. How would you debate that? Lol

 

[Luckyone]

Look at ALL of the programs that democrats want. Free college, free Healthcare, housing subsidies, all these programs, while are great for humanity, are not the responsibility of the federal government. None of that power is given to them by the city's. Wealth tax is another. That violates the cotus equal protection, and proportional taxation clauses.

That is what the Constitution is all about. The Democrats want to help people but there are guidelines that have to be followed. Guidelines that have to do with being fair to all (not just to the poor people), they have to be economically feasable, and they have to be used for the purpose intended and not just to fill the pocketbooks of the rich. Nonetheless, that is what our system of governmen is, meaning compromise by all the parties involved so that it is far for ALL.

Trying to help people is a good thing and giving the intelligent, talented, and able-to-fen-for-themselves people is also a good thing. All extremes are bad and the right is going to the extreme and getting it done. The left is trying to get it done but they follow the Constitution and are not getting anything DONE. There has been no compromise.

 

[Luckyone]

What's to debate? Prices were low on food and gas, I paid less in taxes. Investments were going up. Those are the things I measure a good economy by. How would you debate that? Lol

You really are close minded. The health of a nation is made up of a lot of things (not just the ones you mention). On top of that, you have to compare with what was there before and you also have to compare the entire 4 years and not just the good years.

 

[ThisIsMe]

That is what the Constitution is all about. The Democrats want to help people but there are guidelines that have to be followed. Guidelines that have to do with being fair to all (not just to the poor people), they have to be economically feasable, and they have to be used for the purpose intended and not just to fill the pocketbooks of the rich. Nonetheless, that is what our system of governmen is, meaning compromise by all the parties involved so that it is far for ALL.

Trying to help people is a good thing and giving the intelligent, talented, and able-to-fen-for-themselves people is also a good thing. All extremes are bad and the right is going to the extreme and getting it done. The left is trying to get it done but they follow the Constitution and are not getting anything DONE. There has been no compromise.

No, the constitution doesn't say anything at all about programs to help people. That's not the role of the federal government. That's what I am talking about. If it's not a delegated power TO the government BY the constitution, then it's supposed to go to the states and the people.

Yes, I agree helping people is great, but the government has no authority to do such things.

No compromise needed. Follow the constitution, let the states and the people decide the rest

 

[Luckyone]

No, the constitution doesn't say anything at all about programs to help people. That's not the role of the federal government. That's what I am talking about. If it's not a delegated power TO the government BY the constitution, then it's supposed to go to the states and the people.

Yes, I agree helping people is great, but the government has no authority to do such things.

No compromise needed. Follow the constitution, let the states and the people decide the rest

So you prefer that people not get helped?

We are a nation and as such, we SHOULD help each other, no?

 

[ThisIsMe]

You really are close minded. The health of a nation is made up of a lot of things (not just the ones you mention). On top of that, you have to compare with what was there before and you also have to compare the entire 4 years and not just the good years.

Yeah, we know, you all want to factor covid into trumps economy. Remember, 4 trillion of his spending was covid relief, that people demanded. If he hadn't done it, the left would have criticized him for that as well.

Everything suffered because of covid, and many blue cities and blue mayors were urging that things be shut down. The economy, jobs, and prices all suffered because of it. Despite your feelings of how trump handled covid, nothing was going to prevent the economic problems it caused.

It's too bad, I'd like to have seen where the economy would have gone had it not been for that. Judging by how things were going, it would have been pretty good.

So, those are things that were beyond his control. Also remember, half of covid was under biden, but you all want to give him credit for the natural recovery that happened post covid, as if he did anything to cause a natural return to normality that was going to happen anyway.

 

[Scoutster]

This poll is a lie. If you had added "globalist leftists and their Democrat Zealots" then that answer would be the run away, because it's valid. The other options are not.

All else is just:

View attachment 1062545

Agreed, could not even put liberal Democrats, trying to pretend their libertarians fucking liberals are so funny

 

[ThisIsMe]

So you prefer that people not get helped?

We are a nation and as such, we SHOULD help each other, no?

I never said that. We absolutely should help people, but that should be left to the states. The federal government is not empowered to be a lifeline. Things that you think are valid expenditures, I may not agree with. So, why should I have to pay for things that you want that I don't agree with?

Now, if the state i live in votes for a program, that's a viable thing because it follows the cotus

 

[Luckyone]

Yeah, we know, you all want to factor covid into trumps economy. Remember, 4 trillion of his spending was covid relief, that people demanded. If he hadn't done it, the left would have criticized him for that as well.

Everything suffered because of covid, and many blue cities and blue mayors were urging that things be shut down. The economy, jobs, and prices all suffered because of it. Despite your feelings of how trump handled covid, nothing was going to prevent the economic problems it caused.

It's too bad, I'd like to have seen where the economy would have gone had it not been for that. Judging by how things were going, it would have been pretty good.

So, those are things that were beyond his control. Also remember, half of covid was under biden, but you all want to give him credit for the natural recovery that happened post covid, as if he did anything to cause a natural return to normality that was going to happen anyway.

All I know is that he is generally incompetent and he takes credit for what is there and for what others do. His tariffs on China were done wrong and it cost us more than they gained for us. He increased the debt by $8 billion dollars. His tax cuts helped at first but tax cuts have a habit of causing problems long term and those problems have been seen. The only thing that I personally give him any credit for was that he brought the illegal immigration down but he did it by hurting innocent people, meaning it was a plus but with minuses involved.

Other than that, he divided the country, caused hate to increase, and in my opinion, did the wrong thing with Roe vs Wade. My rating of Trump is no better than a 1 (out of 10 with 10 being the best and 1 being the worst).

 

[Leo123]

All I know is that he is generally incompetent and he takes credit for what is there and for what others do. His tariffs on China were done wrong and it cost us more than they gained for us. He increased the debt by $8 billion dollars. His tax cuts helped at first but tax cuts have a habit of causing problems long term and those problems have been seen. The only thing that I personally give him any credit for was that he brought the illegal immigration down but he did it by hurting innocent people, meaning it was a plus but with minuses involved.

Other than that, he divided the country, caused hate to increase, and in my opinion, did the wrong thing with Roe vs Wade. My rating of Trump is no better than a 1 (out of 10 with 10 being the best and 1 being the worst).

All I know is that we had the best economy of our lifetimes, gas was affordable, goods were affordable, we had no wars and the world respected us. It will be that way again since we flushed Biden and the Democrats down the political drain. It must really suck to be you in your TDS misery.

 

[Leo123]

It was nothing......your words about the Jan 6th insurrection.

You don't get to call a violent act nothing but then call another violent act worse. That is what is called HYPOCRISY

The only real violence was a Capitol cop shooting a defenseless woman dead on Jan 6.