Which One Doesn't Belong?

[PoliticalChic]

Yet you opened it. Read it. And felt the need to respond. All over something about which you say you don’t care.

And you were the very first one to reply.

Your username is a fraud and your posts are often very dishonest.

So, carry on, I guess.

That one.....the most prodigious liar on the board.

 

[PoliticalChic]

All this shows is that MAGAt conservo cultists like yourself like to make a bunch of noise over irrelevant culrure war bullshit because this is easier than having to address the fact that the leader of your cult has lied to you for four years about exposing this Epstein child-sex ring of global elitists once it turned out that he himself is one of the pedos on the list...and you're all surprisingly ok with that because... transgenderism ya' know.

Let’s see how much effort it takes to prove you lying scum.

I said you voted for the anti-American who told her supporters to keep destroying America….

She says they should keep rioting and assaulting police and burning buildings.....she says they shouldn't stop......and you voted in agreement.


They're not gonna stop destroying America......she says...."and they should not!"

Anyone can hear it from her own mouth....and know what lying scum you are.

 

[BackAgain]

Republicans would rather send ICE to round up migrants in the field than knock on the door of the guy who owns the field

It’s not an either/or, you feeble ass propagandist.

 

[rightwinger]

It’s not an either/or, you feeble ass propagandist.

No it isn’t
But we know where ICE spends its resources

 

[BackAgain]

No it isn’t
But we know where ICE spends its resources

You mean mostly on the primary objective?

You’re a libtard; so, of course you object.

 

[MagicMike]

Let’s see how much effort it takes to prove you lying scum.

I said you voted for the anti-American who told her supporters to keep destroying America….

She says they should keep rioting and assaulting police and burning buildings.....she says they shouldn't stop......and you voted in agreement.


They're not gonna stop destroying America......she says...."and they should not!"

Anyone can hear it from her own mouth....and know what lying scum you are.

At least Kamala isn't on the Epstein pedo list like Trump is.

 

[Nostra]

At least Kamala isn't on the Epstein pedo list like Trump is.

Link?

 

[playtime]

How many employers of illegals did your Vegetable Messiah arrest?

right or wrong, dark brandon didn't run on immigration. but he did try to pass a bi partisan bill - the righty right rightwing senator from OK & a (D) sponsored it - would have employed more border control agents AND judges, AND adjudication officers stationed right at the border to streamline asylum requests & deport those ineligible immediately.

it passed the senate & yer chosen one instructed MAGA mike to squash it because it would have been a win for biden.

 

[MagicMike]

Link?

Link this cockwaffle.

 

[MagicMike]

1.In a recent thread about the lack of intellectual Democrat voters, the premise proven by the responsed of board Democrats, the question was would Democrat voters still vote Democrat no matter how hard Left the party goes. None said flatly "no."



2. In fact, the Democrat Party has always had between 30% and 49% of its support from socialists, communists Progressives, Liberals.
"The progressive left, and the liberal left, while not themselves communists, share many of the same sympathies, such of redistribution of wealth, and worker’s rights, nationalizations of industry, etc, but are not quite as far left as the communists, and would not go to the same lengths as the communists to achieve their goals. This does not mean, though, that the help of these dupes is not necessary in order for the communists to achieve victory. Dr. Paul Kengor, Hoover Institution, Stanford “DUPES: How America's Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century



3.Communist Sanders neary got the Democrat nomination until the party stole it for Hillary.
"There are lessons here for Democrats more broadly as well. First, being anti-Trump is not enough. As Bernie Sanders wrote, Mamdani’s win shows that “we have to bring forth a positive vision and an analysis of why things are the way they are.” Mamdani’s win is a clear indication — if another were needed — that the Democratic establishment is badly out of touch. Its near-unanimous opposition to Mamdani echoed its circle-the-wagons resistance to Sanders in 2020.... "

What Mamdani’s Win Can (and Can’t) Teach Us​

Zohran Mamdani’s astounding triumph shows the power of bread-and-butter economics and the bankruptcy of the Democratic establishment. But how many of its lessons can be applied nationally?

jacobin.com




4. The establishment Democrats, more focused on winning than on ideology (socialism, anti-Semitism, racism) "...Mamdani’s victory does and does not suggest about progressive politics more broadly, particularly outside Democratic strongholds like New York City. First, Mamdani’s victory in no way suggests that progressives everywhere can campaign as far left as possible on divisive social issues and still break through to working-class voters."
Ibid.




5. "While college-educated voters may be sufficient to win a New York City Democratic primary, that is not at all the reality in key swing states and districts where the numbers simply don’t add up. The coalition that carried Mamdani — renters, service workers, and progressive professionals — is a real and growing one. But it’s not large enough to win national elections or even many statewide contests."
Ibid.




This is the problem I posited for Democrats on this board, but none would say that they wouldn't vote Democrat if it means socialism, anti-Semitism, racism, even though that means no national election wins ever.

Brilliant, huh?

Do you believe Republican voters have such low standards they will still cast votes for MAGAt candidates who openly cover up the exposure of the Trump/Epstein pedophile sex trafficking ring?

 

[Nostra]

right or wrong, dark brandon didn't run on immigration. but he did try to pass a bi partisan bill - the righty right rightwing senator from OK & a (D) sponsored it - would have employed more border control agents AND judges, AND adjudication officers stationed right at the border to streamline asylum requests & deport those ineligible immediately.

it passed the senate & yer chosen one instructed MAGA mike to squash it because it would have been a win for biden.

So zero.

Ok, you can STFU now, Simp.

 

[Nostra]

Link this cockwaffle.

Always fun to trigger someone in the middle of a 4 year meltdown.

 

[Nostra]

Do you believe Republican voters have such low standards they will still cast votes for MAGAt candidates who openly cover up the exposure of the Trump/Epstein pedophile sex trafficking ring?

Link us up to this Trump/Epstein pedo ring.

I say you are a liar and can’t bring a link.

 

[MagicMike]

Link us up to this Trump/Epstein pedo ring.

I say you are a liar and can’t bring a link.

Aw shut up you twit! I don't give a flying **** if you call me a liar...or anything else. I know from experience here with you, you just pretend to ask for "proof" of things, but you are immune to facts.
You just like to waste time with these circular arguments. It's always some variation of:
"Prove it!"
Then when proof is provided...
"I said prove it"
"It's right there in front of you dude"
"No it isn't"
"Yes it is"
"No it isn't"
"Yes it is"
"Prove it."
And on and on and on.
**** off and get a life. Donald Trump is on the Epstein pedo client list.
Prove me wrong.