Bud Light Marketed It's Beer To The Underaged

[Sixties Fan]

It surely was political. Are you saying that Dylan Mulvaney doesn't have a national audience?

You use anything to excuse your Transphobia.

 

[Kilroy2]

I'm actually not a beer drinker. I just think that giving credence to a sicko to influence our children to think that these sick behaviors is acceptable is unacceptable. Leave our kids alone.

Who is the sicko that you are referring to?

Well you know as a parent that is how most will think about protecting their children. Its not that I am for underage drinking as a parent but I have been there as a teen.

Still underage drinking is a problem with Parents and their children dynamics. It is also about peer pressure. Then its about how do they get this beer?

To say AB is the perp and it is their fault is ignoring the other causes. Beer will always be available because somebody buy it for them or the seller who ignores the obvious laws. Maybe even some parents who allow it.

To say that there advertising targets minors is stretching it

Finally most states do allow underage drinking under certain circumstances such as in the presence of parents.

 

[marvin martian]

Hadn't thought of this before but since many of Dylan Mulvaney's followers are those under the age of 21, the legal age to drink just about everywhere in the US, Bud Light must have known they would be marketing alcohol to the underaged. By paying Dylan Mulvaney to market their beer to those Mulvaney influences, they were marketing alcohol to the underaged, plain and simple. How low can this company be?

Cruz demands Anheuser-Busch 'cooperate' with investigation into Dylan Mulvaney controversy

Senate Commerce Committee ranking member Ted Cruz, R-Texas, sent a letter to Anheuser-Busch's CEO to demand the company comply with the committee's probe into the Dylan Mulvaney controversy.

www.yahoo.com

It's going to look even worse for Bud after Mulvaney gets busted for pedophilia (and he will).

 

[HeyNorm]

It was not political, and it was just that person doing it on their account, it was not a Bud National advertisement.

Grow UP !

Ummmm, how old are you? Retire before the interwebs?

In todays world, hiring a social media influencer IS NATIONAL ADVERTISING. In fact, it’s actually INTERNATIONAL ADVERTISING.

Got it grandpa?

 

[Sixties Fan]

Fact Check: Was Bud Light marketing team fired over Dylan Mulvaney fallout?

Over the past week, Bud Light and its parent company Anheuser-Busch faced criticism for partnering with Dylan Mulvaney, a transgender advocate.

www.newsweek.com

According to the New York Post, Mulvaney has earned more than $1 million through promoting brands on social media. These companies cover everything from fashion and skincare to grocery shopping.

However, it is her partnership with Bud Light in April that has captured headlines, with the collaboration leading to boycotts, derision and furor among conservatives.

At the time, a spokesperson for Bud Light's owner, Anheuser-Busch, told Newsweek that the "commemorative" can was typical of its work with "hundreds of influencers" across its brands "as one of many ways to authentically connect with audiences across various demographics."

The spokesperson added that the commemorative can "was a gift to celebrate a personal milestone and is not for sale to the general public."


(full article online)

Dylan Mulvaney reveals new ad after Bud Light fiasco

The social media influencer's new paid partnership post comes after her Bud Light partnership led to backlash and boycotts.

www.newsweek.com

 

[FA_Q2]

It's going to look even worse for Bud after Mulvaney gets busted for pedophilia (and he will).

Based on what? Your fantasies?

 

[marvin martian]

Based on what? Your fantasies?

Statistics.

 

[Dragonlady]

Hadn't thought of this before but since many of Dylan Mulvaney's followers are those under the age of 21, the legal age to drink just about everywhere in the US, Bud Light must have known they would be marketing alcohol to the underaged. By paying Dylan Mulvaney to market their beer to those Mulvaney influences, they were marketing alcohol to the underaged, plain and simple. How low can this company be?

Cruz demands Anheuser-Busch 'cooperate' with investigation into Dylan Mulvaney controversy

Senate Commerce Committee ranking member Ted Cruz, R-Texas, sent a letter to Anheuser-Busch's CEO to demand the company comply with the committee's probe into the Dylan Mulvaney controversy.

www.yahoo.com

Just when I think that Republicans couldn't get any dumber, they're wanting to investigate a beer marketing campaign????

What a fucking waste of time!!! Hunter Biden, Beer marketing, and Government inference in their Twitter accounts. They're doing NOTHING for the American people who elected them.

 

[FA_Q2]

Fact Check: Was Bud Light marketing team fired over Dylan Mulvaney fallout?

Over the past week, Bud Light and its parent company Anheuser-Busch faced criticism for partnering with Dylan Mulvaney, a transgender advocate.

www.newsweek.com

According to the New York Post, Mulvaney has earned more than $1 million through promoting brands on social media. These companies cover everything from fashion and skincare to grocery shopping.

However, it is her partnership with Bud Light in April that has captured headlines, with the collaboration leading to boycotts, derision and furor among conservatives.

At the time, a spokesperson for Bud Light's owner, Anheuser-Busch, told Newsweek that the "commemorative" can was typical of its work with "hundreds of influencers" across its brands "as one of many ways to authentically connect with audiences across various demographics."

The spokesperson added that the commemorative can "was a gift to celebrate a personal milestone and is not for sale to the general public."


(full article online)

Dylan Mulvaney reveals new ad after Bud Light fiasco

The social media influencer's new paid partnership post comes after her Bud Light partnership led to backlash and boycotts.

www.newsweek.com

This has nothing to do with the thread.

Do you have a point?

 

[FA_Q2]

Statistics.

I notice you SAID statistics but failed to actually provide a single statistic. Go on.

 

[Sixties Fan]

This has nothing to do with the thread.

Do you have a point?

Isn't Bud being attacked as selling beer to minors?

Aren't some of Mulvaney's followers possibly minors?

I did not bring up Mulvaney's name, another poster did.

I answered them.

Bud did NOT market to minors via Mulvaney. That is the whole point I was making.

 

[Dragonlady]

Statistics.

The statistics show that 20% of sexual assaults of children, are committed by religious leaders - ministers, lay preachers and youth leaders.

Here are the REAL facts on child sexual abuse:

https://www.ywca.org/wp-content/uploads/WWV-CSA-Fact-Sheet-Final.pdf

Child Sexual Abuse Statistics – The National Center for Victims of Crime

victimsofcrime.org

People Who Engage in Sexual Abuse or Exploitation - Child Welfare Information Gateway

Find resources regarding the characteristics of people who sexually abuse children, including information about juvenile sex offenders, female sex offenders, and sexual exploitation.

www.childwelfare.gov

Recruiters/Traffickers : The NO Project

www.thenoproject.org

Notice how NONE of these reporting organizations even mention trans or drag queens as child sexual abusers.

 

[HeyNorm]

The statistics show that 20% of sexual assaults of children, are committed by religious leaders - ministers, lay preachers and youth leaders.

AND GAY!

You people crack me the hell up!

 

[FA_Q2]

Isn't Bud being attacked as selling beer to minors?

Aren't some of Mulvaney's followers possibly minors?

I did not bring up Mulvaney's name, another poster did.

I answered them.

Bud did NOT market to minors via Mulvaney. That is the whole point I was making.

They are in a marketing partnership with Mulvaney. Is that a false statement?

If so I stand corrected. The fact the can was not being sold is not really relevant though IF they have a marketing partnership with her.

Maybe I missed something.

 

[marvin martian]

The statistics show that 20% of sexual assaults of children, are committed by religious leaders - ministers, lay preachers and youth leaders.

Here are the REAL facts on child sexual abuse:

https://www.ywca.org/wp-content/uploads/WWV-CSA-Fact-Sheet-Final.pdf

Child Sexual Abuse Statistics – The National Center for Victims of Crime

victimsofcrime.org

People Who Engage in Sexual Abuse or Exploitation - Child Welfare Information Gateway

Find resources regarding the characteristics of people who sexually abuse children, including information about juvenile sex offenders, female sex offenders, and sexual exploitation.

www.childwelfare.gov

Recruiters/Traffickers : The NO Project

www.thenoproject.org

Notice how NONE of these reporting organizations even mention trans or drag queens as child sexual abusers.

What about the other 80%?

 

[Sixties Fan]

They are in a marketing partnership with Mulvaney. Is that a false statement?

If so I stand corrected. The fact the can was not being sold is not really relevant though IF they have a marketing partnership with her.

Maybe I missed something.

DID Bud HAVE a partnership with her or did they just make a special can for her commemorating something she had accomplished?

If at no point she posted for her followers to go buy BUD, and I do not have TikTok, then what kind of partnership was it? It looked to me that the whole thing may have been about the can and her post on Tik Tok, I am not sure right now, will have to research later.

 

[Dragonlady]

AND GAY!

You people crack me the hell up!

You think child sexual abuse is funny???? I can see you didnt even look at the links at all, did you? If you had, you would have realized that

1. 1 in 5 girls and 1 in 20 boys is a victim of child sexual abuse;

There are far more female victims than male.

2. 96 percent of people who sexually abuse children are male, 76 percent are married men, and 76.8 percent of people who sexually abuse children are adults.

 

[FA_Q2]

What about the other 80%?

Still not citing a statistic?

 

[FA_Q2]

DID Bud HAVE a partnership with her or did they just make a special can for her commemorating something she had accomplished?

If at no point she posted for her followers to go buy BUD, and I do not have TikTok, then what kind of partnership was it? It looked to me that the whole thing may have been about the can and her post on Tik Tok, I am not sure right now, will have to research later.

This was paid:

The Bud Light boycott?? because sure, explained

Bud Light sent a handful of beers to a trans influencer, and all hell broke loose.

www.vox.com

"In early April, Bud Light sent an influencer named Dylan Mulvaney a handful of beers. Mulvaney, in turn, posted a video of herself dressed like Holly Golightly from Breakfast at Tiffany’s, using said beers to celebrate both March Madness and her first year of womanhood. One of the cans featured her image. It was part of a paid sponsorship deal and promotion for some sort of sweepstakes challenge where people can win $15,000 from Bud Light by sending in videos of themselves carrying a lot of beers."

So yes, it was promotional. Otherwise this would make no sense at all.

Of course, given political hacks these days it does not actually have to make sense, lol.

 

[Dragonlady]

What about the other 80%?

From one of my links:

https://www.ywca.org/wp-content/uploads/WWV-CSA-Fact-Sheet-Final.pdf

"A common myth is that child sexual abuse is perpetrated by strangers and pedophiles. But most people who sexually abuse children are our friends, partners, family members, and community members. About 93 percent of children who are victims of sexual abuse know their abuser. Less than 10 percent of sexually abused children are abused by a stranger".

85% of all strippers, and 95% of all hookers and sex trade workers, were sexually abused as children. Those porn sites you're visiting - all those women were likely sexually abused as children. If you're buying internet porn, you are participating in child sexual abuse.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0145213481900508

https://www.cjcmh.com/doi/pdf/10.7870/cjcmh-1987-0001