which is the larger #: 34, 10, or 3.4

[harmonica]

..ok math geniuses ....the MERS virus killed 34% ....SARS 10% kills ...the EVIL Covid 3.4% kills
..which is the more deadly?
..take your time ..it's a very difficult question

here's a hint:

For one, we know that the coronavirus outbreak is not as deadly as the SARS epidemic of 2003, which killed around 10% of the 8,098 confirmed cases of the respiratory illness.

How the coronavirus compares to SARS, swine flu, Zika, and other epidemics

 

[Oddball]

The betwetting buffoons whipping up the hysteria aren't interested....Now get your ass into your truck and start buying up all the toilet paper that you can lay your hands on!

 

[harmonica]

The betwetting buffoons whipping up the hysteria aren't interested....Now get your ass into your truck and start buying up all the toilet paper that you can lay your hands on!

I always have extra TP in case of the world ending

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

The betwetting buffoons whipping up the hysteria aren't interested....Now get your ass into your truck and start buying up all the toilet paper that you can lay your hands on!

I always have extra TP in case of the world ending

Just went out and bought 100 proof vodka. If I need it for hand sanitizing , then it is available, it as you say the world ends, then the bottle will be empty...

 

[harmonica]

The betwetting buffoons whipping up the hysteria aren't interested....Now get your ass into your truck and start buying up all the toilet paper that you can lay your hands on!

I always have extra TP in case of the world ending

Just went out and bought 100 proof vodka. If I need it for hand sanitizing , then it is available, it as you say the world ends, then the bottle will be empty...

..it's good for starting fires also....?

 

[bluzman61]

The betwetting buffoons whipping up the hysteria aren't interested....Now get your ass into your truck and start buying up all the toilet paper that you can lay your hands on!

And DON'T forget about hand sanitizer!

 

[harmonica]

The betwetting buffoons whipping up the hysteria aren't interested....Now get your ass into your truck and start buying up all the toilet paper that you can lay your hands on!

And DON'T forget about hand sanitizer!

FIRE is the best sanitizer

 

[ReinyDays]

MERS? ...

Camels typically vector MERS into humans ... just wash your hands after handling any camels and you're safe ...

Zika? ...

The closing ceremonies at the Rio Olympics eradicated that forever ... if the media is to be believed ...

Corona? ...

We'll find out ... and keep your hands washed ...

 

[harmonica]

MERS? ...

Camels typically vector MERS into humans ... just wash your hands after handling any camels and you're safe ...

Zika? ...

The closing ceremonies at the Rio Olympics eradicated that forever ... if the media is to be believed ...

Corona? ...

We'll find out ... and keep your hands washed ...

I wash my hands very 10 minutes

 

[Rambunctious]

 

[Montrovant]

..ok math geniuses ....the MERS virus killed 34% ....SARS 10% kills ...the EVIL Covid 3.4% kills
..which is the more deadly?
..take your time ..it's a very difficult question

here's a hint:

For one, we know that the coronavirus outbreak is not as deadly as the SARS epidemic of 2003, which killed around 10% of the 8,098 confirmed cases of the respiratory illness.

How the coronavirus compares to SARS, swine flu, Zika, and other epidemics

And yet COVID-19 has killed many more than SARS did in 2003. How can that be? Oh, right, it's infected many more people.

Yes, there's a lot more panic than necessary about coronavirus. However, the deadliness of a disease is not limited to the percentage of people who get it that die. It also has to do with how many people get it. The Spanish Flu is estimated to have killed at least 50 million people. It had a lower death rate than MERS, though. Still, it was one of the deadliest infections to occur in human history. That's because it is estimated to have infected 500 million people.

 

[harmonica]

..ok math geniuses ....the MERS virus killed 34% ....SARS 10% kills ...the EVIL Covid 3.4% kills
..which is the more deadly?
..take your time ..it's a very difficult question

here's a hint:

For one, we know that the coronavirus outbreak is not as deadly as the SARS epidemic of 2003, which killed around 10% of the 8,098 confirmed cases of the respiratory illness.

How the coronavirus compares to SARS, swine flu, Zika, and other epidemics

And yet COVID-19 has killed many more than SARS did in 2003. How can that be? Oh, right, it's infected many more people.

Yes, there's a lot more panic than necessary about coronavirus. However, the deadliness of a disease is not limited to the percentage of people who get it that die. It also has to do with how many people get it. The Spanish Flu is estimated to have killed at least 50 million people. It had a lower death rate than MERS, though. Still, it was one of the deadliest infections to occur in human history. That's because it is estimated to have infected 500 million people.

wrong
dead·ly
/ˈdedlē/
adjective

1. causing or able to cause death.

Spanish Flu comparison is wrong---that was over a hundred years ago

 

[Montrovant]

..ok math geniuses ....the MERS virus killed 34% ....SARS 10% kills ...the EVIL Covid 3.4% kills
..which is the more deadly?
..take your time ..it's a very difficult question

here's a hint:

For one, we know that the coronavirus outbreak is not as deadly as the SARS epidemic of 2003, which killed around 10% of the 8,098 confirmed cases of the respiratory illness.

How the coronavirus compares to SARS, swine flu, Zika, and other epidemics

And yet COVID-19 has killed many more than SARS did in 2003. How can that be? Oh, right, it's infected many more people.

Yes, there's a lot more panic than necessary about coronavirus. However, the deadliness of a disease is not limited to the percentage of people who get it that die. It also has to do with how many people get it. The Spanish Flu is estimated to have killed at least 50 million people. It had a lower death rate than MERS, though. Still, it was one of the deadliest infections to occur in human history. That's because it is estimated to have infected 500 million people.

wrong
dead·ly
/ˈdedlē/
adjective

1. causing or able to cause death.

Spanish Flu comparison is wrong---that was over a hundred years ago

Something is able to cause more death if it affects more people. Only 8,000 people got MERS. It was deadly within that group, but not to the overall population.

 

[Pogo]

..ok math geniuses ....the MERS virus killed 34% ....SARS 10% kills ...the EVIL Covid 3.4% kills
..which is the more deadly?
..take your time ..it's a very difficult question

here's a hint:

For one, we know that the coronavirus outbreak is not as deadly as the SARS epidemic of 2003, which killed around 10% of the 8,098 confirmed cases of the respiratory illness.

How the coronavirus compares to SARS, swine flu, Zika, and other epidemics

Was there a point coming with this or does it cost extra?

 

[colfax_m]

..ok math geniuses ....the MERS virus killed 34% ....SARS 10% kills ...the EVIL Covid 3.4% kills
..which is the more deadly?
..take your time ..it's a very difficult question

here's a hint:

For one, we know that the coronavirus outbreak is not as deadly as the SARS epidemic of 2003, which killed around 10% of the 8,098 confirmed cases of the respiratory illness.

How the coronavirus compares to SARS, swine flu, Zika, and other epidemics

And yet COVID-19 has killed many more than SARS did in 2003. How can that be? Oh, right, it's infected many more people.

Yes, there's a lot more panic than necessary about coronavirus. However, the deadliness of a disease is not limited to the percentage of people who get it that die. It also has to do with how many people get it. The Spanish Flu is estimated to have killed at least 50 million people. It had a lower death rate than MERS, though. Still, it was one of the deadliest infections to occur in human history. That's because it is estimated to have infected 500 million people.

wrong
dead·ly
/ˈdedlē/
adjective

1. causing or able to cause death.

Spanish Flu comparison is wrong---that was over a hundred years ago

Deadliness of a infectious disease is a product of its lethality and it’s transmissibility.

The worst diseases have a sweet spot between being highly infectious and high lethality.

 

[harmonica]

..ok math geniuses ....the MERS virus killed 34% ....SARS 10% kills ...the EVIL Covid 3.4% kills
..which is the more deadly?
..take your time ..it's a very difficult question

here's a hint:

For one, we know that the coronavirus outbreak is not as deadly as the SARS epidemic of 2003, which killed around 10% of the 8,098 confirmed cases of the respiratory illness.

How the coronavirus compares to SARS, swine flu, Zika, and other epidemics

And yet COVID-19 has killed many more than SARS did in 2003. How can that be? Oh, right, it's infected many more people.

Yes, there's a lot more panic than necessary about coronavirus. However, the deadliness of a disease is not limited to the percentage of people who get it that die. It also has to do with how many people get it. The Spanish Flu is estimated to have killed at least 50 million people. It had a lower death rate than MERS, though. Still, it was one of the deadliest infections to occur in human history. That's because it is estimated to have infected 500 million people.

wrong
dead·ly
/ˈdedlē/
adjective

1. causing or able to cause death.

Spanish Flu comparison is wrong---that was over a hundred years ago

Deadliness of a infectious disease is a product of its lethality and it’s transmissibility.

The worst diseases have a sweet spot between being highly infectious and high lethality.

if they are more deadly then they kill themselves out ''fast''

 

[harmonica]

..ok math geniuses ....the MERS virus killed 34% ....SARS 10% kills ...the EVIL Covid 3.4% kills
..which is the more deadly?
..take your time ..it's a very difficult question

here's a hint:

For one, we know that the coronavirus outbreak is not as deadly as the SARS epidemic of 2003, which killed around 10% of the 8,098 confirmed cases of the respiratory illness.

How the coronavirus compares to SARS, swine flu, Zika, and other epidemics

Was there a point coming with this or does it cost extra?

yes, we are trying to find who is a genius or not--I guess you are not

 

[harmonica]

..ok math geniuses ....the MERS virus killed 34% ....SARS 10% kills ...the EVIL Covid 3.4% kills
..which is the more deadly?
..take your time ..it's a very difficult question

here's a hint:

For one, we know that the coronavirus outbreak is not as deadly as the SARS epidemic of 2003, which killed around 10% of the 8,098 confirmed cases of the respiratory illness.

How the coronavirus compares to SARS, swine flu, Zika, and other epidemics

And yet COVID-19 has killed many more than SARS did in 2003. How can that be? Oh, right, it's infected many more people.

Yes, there's a lot more panic than necessary about coronavirus. However, the deadliness of a disease is not limited to the percentage of people who get it that die. It also has to do with how many people get it. The Spanish Flu is estimated to have killed at least 50 million people. It had a lower death rate than MERS, though. Still, it was one of the deadliest infections to occur in human history. That's because it is estimated to have infected 500 million people.

wrong
dead·ly
/ˈdedlē/
adjective

1. causing or able to cause death.

Spanish Flu comparison is wrong---that was over a hundred years ago

Something is able to cause more death if it affects more people. Only 8,000 people got MERS. It was deadly within that group, but not to the overall population.

if it kills more people faster than it kills itself faster = not as deadly as the common flu

 

[Pogo]

..ok math geniuses ....the MERS virus killed 34% ....SARS 10% kills ...the EVIL Covid 3.4% kills
..which is the more deadly?
..take your time ..it's a very difficult question

here's a hint:

For one, we know that the coronavirus outbreak is not as deadly as the SARS epidemic of 2003, which killed around 10% of the 8,098 confirmed cases of the respiratory illness.

How the coronavirus compares to SARS, swine flu, Zika, and other epidemics

And yet COVID-19 has killed many more than SARS did in 2003. How can that be? Oh, right, it's infected many more people.

Yes, there's a lot more panic than necessary about coronavirus. However, the deadliness of a disease is not limited to the percentage of people who get it that die. It also has to do with how many people get it. The Spanish Flu is estimated to have killed at least 50 million people. It had a lower death rate than MERS, though. Still, it was one of the deadliest infections to occur in human history. That's because it is estimated to have infected 500 million people.

wrong
dead·ly
/ˈdedlē/
adjective

1. causing or able to cause death.

Spanish Flu comparison is wrong---that was over a hundred years ago

Something is able to cause more death if it affects more people. Only 8,000 people got MERS. It was deadly within that group, but not to the overall population.

if it kills more people faster than it kills itself faster = not as deadly as the common flu

Okay, you REALLY need Captain Obvious to state himself?

Out of those viruses in your OP .................... which one is current?

Take your time.

 

[harmonica]

..ok math geniuses ....the MERS virus killed 34% ....SARS 10% kills ...the EVIL Covid 3.4% kills
..which is the more deadly?
..take your time ..it's a very difficult question

here's a hint:
How the coronavirus compares to SARS, swine flu, Zika, and other epidemics

And yet COVID-19 has killed many more than SARS did in 2003. How can that be? Oh, right, it's infected many more people.

Yes, there's a lot more panic than necessary about coronavirus. However, the deadliness of a disease is not limited to the percentage of people who get it that die. It also has to do with how many people get it. The Spanish Flu is estimated to have killed at least 50 million people. It had a lower death rate than MERS, though. Still, it was one of the deadliest infections to occur in human history. That's because it is estimated to have infected 500 million people.

wrong
dead·ly
/ˈdedlē/
adjective

1. causing or able to cause death.

Spanish Flu comparison is wrong---that was over a hundred years ago

Something is able to cause more death if it affects more people. Only 8,000 people got MERS. It was deadly within that group, but not to the overall population.

if it kills more people faster than it kills itself faster = not as deadly as the common flu

Okay, you REALLY need Captain Obvious to state himself?

Out of those viruses in your OP .................... which one is current?

Take your time.

the question is not which one is current--DUH