Where is this mountain of evidence for evolution?

[S.J.]

See what I mean?

I see only your inability to offer a coherent comment. This thread is not about your tender sensibilities being offended by science or your YEC'ist beliefs being refuted. Stop whining.

And once again you prove me right.

Once again you prove you're a pointless spammer. No one but you is responsible for your inadequacies.

CA202 Evolution proof

Read the first line in your copy and paste link. They admit they have no proof.

"Nothing in the real world can be proved with absolute certainty."

As usual, you sweepingly don't understand..... even the most simple concepts.

Ah, the default argument of the arrogant and the idiotic.

 

[Hollie]

Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution

Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution
Copyright © 1995-1997 by Mark Isaak

A large part of the reason why Creationist arguments against evolution can sound so persuasive is because they don't address evolution, but rather argue against a set of misunderstandings that people are right to consider ludicrous. The Creationists wrongly believe that their understanding of evolution is what the theory of evolution really says, and declare evolution banished. In fact, they haven't even addressed the topic of evolution. (The situation isn't helped by poor science education generally. Even most beginning college biology students don't understand the theory of evolution.)

 

[Hollie]

I see only your inability to offer a coherent comment. This thread is not about your tender sensibilities being offended by science or your YEC'ist beliefs being refuted. Stop whining.

And once again you prove me right.

Once again you prove you're a pointless spammer. No one but you is responsible for your inadequacies.

CA202 Evolution proof

Read the first line in your copy and paste link. They admit they have no proof.

"Nothing in the real world can be proved with absolute certainty."

As usual, you sweepingly don't understand..... even the most simple concepts.

Ah, the default argument of the arrogant and the idiotic.

Yours is the last resort of the Christian fundie who can't defend his YEC'ist fantasies.

Stop whining. Learn to appreciate the education you're being given. You're an accomplice to fear, ignorance and gullibility. Don't be an accomplice.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution

Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution
Copyright © 1995-1997 by Mark Isaak

A large part of the reason why Creationist arguments against evolution can sound so persuasive is because they don't address evolution, but rather argue against a set of misunderstandings that people are right to consider ludicrous. The Creationists wrongly believe that their understanding of evolution is what the theory of evolution really says, and declare evolution banished. In fact, they haven't even addressed the topic of evolution. (The situation isn't helped by poor science education generally. Even most beginning college biology students don't understand the theory of evolution.)

Satan made it up... OMG. How can you seriously believe that our entire body came together from nothing? All this complexity in just 4.5 billion years... I haven't seen any new species created in my life time.

 

[Hollie]

CB102 Mutations adding information

Claim CB102:
Mutations are random noise; they do not add information. Evolution cannot cause an increase in information.
Source:
AIG, n.d. Creation Education Center. Doing a Report on Creation vs. Evolution Answers in Genesis


Response:

1. It is hard to understand how anyone could make this claim, since anything mutations can do, mutations can undo. Some mutations add information to a genome; some subtract it. Creationists get by with this claim only by leaving the term "information" undefined, impossibly vague, or constantly shifting. By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve. We have observed the evolution of
   • increased genetic variety in a population (Lenski 1995; Lenski et al. 1991)
   • increased genetic material (Alves et al. 2001; Brown et al. 1998; Hughes and Friedman 2003; Lynch and Conery 2000; Ohta 2003)
   • novel genetic material (Knox et al. 1996; Park et al. 1996)
   • novel genetically-regulated abilities (Prijambada et al. 1995)

 

[S.J.]

And once again you prove me right.

Once again you prove you're a pointless spammer. No one but you is responsible for your inadequacies.

CA202 Evolution proof

Read the first line in your copy and paste link. They admit they have no proof.

"Nothing in the real world can be proved with absolute certainty."

As usual, you sweepingly don't understand..... even the most simple concepts.

Ah, the default argument of the arrogant and the idiotic.

Yours is the last resort of the Christian fundie who can't defend his YEC'ist fantasies.

Stop whining. Learn to appreciate the education you're being given. You're an accomplice to fear, ignorance and gullibility. Don't be an accomplice.

Another default argument - Assign a position to your opponent they did not take.

 

[S.J.]

CB102 Mutations adding information

Claim CB102:
Mutations are random noise; they do not add information. Evolution cannot cause an increase in information.
Source:
AIG, n.d. Creation Education Center. Doing a Report on Creation vs. Evolution Answers in Genesis


Response:

1. It is hard to understand how anyone could make this claim, since anything mutations can do, mutations can undo. Some mutations add information to a genome; some subtract it. Creationists get by with this claim only by leaving the term "information" undefined, impossibly vague, or constantly shifting. By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve. We have observed the evolution of
   • increased genetic variety in a population (Lenski 1995; Lenski et al. 1991)
   • increased genetic material (Alves et al. 2001; Brown et al. 1998; Hughes and Friedman 2003; Lynch and Conery 2000; Ohta 2003)
   • novel genetic material (Knox et al. 1996; Park et al. 1996)
   • novel genetically-regulated abilities (Prijambada et al. 1995)

I like how you copy and paste other people's statements but have none of your own.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

CB102 Mutations adding information

Claim CB102:
Mutations are random noise; they do not add information. Evolution cannot cause an increase in information.
Source:
AIG, n.d. Creation Education Center. Doing a Report on Creation vs. Evolution Answers in Genesis


Response:

1. It is hard to understand how anyone could make this claim, since anything mutations can do, mutations can undo. Some mutations add information to a genome; some subtract it. Creationists get by with this claim only by leaving the term "information" undefined, impossibly vague, or constantly shifting. By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve. We have observed the evolution of
   • increased genetic variety in a population (Lenski 1995; Lenski et al. 1991)
   • increased genetic material (Alves et al. 2001; Brown et al. 1998; Hughes and Friedman 2003; Lynch and Conery 2000; Ohta 2003)
   • novel genetic material (Knox et al. 1996; Park et al. 1996)
   • novel genetically-regulated abilities (Prijambada et al. 1995)

I know mutations exist but show me a good one or one that is a functioning new organ. All I've ever seen is ones that end up killing the animal

 

[Hollie]

Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution

Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution
Copyright © 1995-1997 by Mark Isaak

A large part of the reason why Creationist arguments against evolution can sound so persuasive is because they don't address evolution, but rather argue against a set of misunderstandings that people are right to consider ludicrous. The Creationists wrongly believe that their understanding of evolution is what the theory of evolution really says, and declare evolution banished. In fact, they haven't even addressed the topic of evolution. (The situation isn't helped by poor science education generally. Even most beginning college biology students don't understand the theory of evolution.)

Satan made it up... OMG. How can you seriously believe that our entire body came together from nothing? All this complexity in just 4.5 billion years... I haven't seen any new species created in my life time.

We've seen at least one new species. The Christian fundamentalist has evolved from the former biblical creationist to the more recent Intelligent design creationist.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution

Five Major Misconceptions about Evolution
Copyright © 1995-1997 by Mark Isaak

A large part of the reason why Creationist arguments against evolution can sound so persuasive is because they don't address evolution, but rather argue against a set of misunderstandings that people are right to consider ludicrous. The Creationists wrongly believe that their understanding of evolution is what the theory of evolution really says, and declare evolution banished. In fact, they haven't even addressed the topic of evolution. (The situation isn't helped by poor science education generally. Even most beginning college biology students don't understand the theory of evolution.)

Satan made it up... OMG. How can you seriously believe that our entire body came together from nothing? All this complexity in just 4.5 billion years... I haven't seen any new species created in my life time.

We've seen at least one new species. The Christian fundamentalist has evolved from the former biblical creationist to the more recent Intelligent design creationist.

I think it's ignorant that evolutionists make claims as if it's fact when you haven't observed it. Other theories held to that esteem have much move evidence and can be witnessed. Once again show me a new type of organ or some useful shit come from no where because I think it was all programmed at the beginning of life.

The reason it evolved is because evolutionist morons just continually attack religion during debates like this instead of talking about the issue that you're supposed to be talking about.

 

[Hollie]

CB102 Mutations adding information

Claim CB102:
Mutations are random noise; they do not add information. Evolution cannot cause an increase in information.
Source:
AIG, n.d. Creation Education Center. Doing a Report on Creation vs. Evolution Answers in Genesis


Response:

1. It is hard to understand how anyone could make this claim, since anything mutations can do, mutations can undo. Some mutations add information to a genome; some subtract it. Creationists get by with this claim only by leaving the term "information" undefined, impossibly vague, or constantly shifting. By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve. We have observed the evolution of
   • increased genetic variety in a population (Lenski 1995; Lenski et al. 1991)
   • increased genetic material (Alves et al. 2001; Brown et al. 1998; Hughes and Friedman 2003; Lynch and Conery 2000; Ohta 2003)
   • novel genetic material (Knox et al. 1996; Park et al. 1996)
   • novel genetically-regulated abilities (Prijambada et al. 1995)

I like how you copy and paste other people's statements but have none of your own.

I like how the facts of evolution, which you deny, cause you to whine and moan when they're presented to you.

Stop whining.

 

[cnm]

Read the first line in your copy and paste link. They admit they have no proof.

"Nothing in the real world can be proved with absolute certainty."

As you have been told repeatedly - and have ignored invincibly - the thread is about evidence, not proof.

 

[Hollie]

CB102 Mutations adding information

Claim CB102:
Mutations are random noise; they do not add information. Evolution cannot cause an increase in information.
Source:
AIG, n.d. Creation Education Center. Doing a Report on Creation vs. Evolution Answers in Genesis


Response:

1. It is hard to understand how anyone could make this claim, since anything mutations can do, mutations can undo. Some mutations add information to a genome; some subtract it. Creationists get by with this claim only by leaving the term "information" undefined, impossibly vague, or constantly shifting. By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve. We have observed the evolution of
   • increased genetic variety in a population (Lenski 1995; Lenski et al. 1991)
   • increased genetic material (Alves et al. 2001; Brown et al. 1998; Hughes and Friedman 2003; Lynch and Conery 2000; Ohta 2003)
   • novel genetic material (Knox et al. 1996; Park et al. 1996)
   • novel genetically-regulated abilities (Prijambada et al. 1995)

I know mutations exist but show me a good one or one that is a functioning new organ. All I've ever seen is ones that end up killing the animal

You have a valid point there. The mutant biblical creationist which evolved into the later intelligent design creationist ended up killing the credibility of the species.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

CB102 Mutations adding information

Claim CB102:
Mutations are random noise; they do not add information. Evolution cannot cause an increase in information.
Source:
AIG, n.d. Creation Education Center. Doing a Report on Creation vs. Evolution Answers in Genesis


Response:

1. It is hard to understand how anyone could make this claim, since anything mutations can do, mutations can undo. Some mutations add information to a genome; some subtract it. Creationists get by with this claim only by leaving the term "information" undefined, impossibly vague, or constantly shifting. By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve. We have observed the evolution of
   • increased genetic variety in a population (Lenski 1995; Lenski et al. 1991)
   • increased genetic material (Alves et al. 2001; Brown et al. 1998; Hughes and Friedman 2003; Lynch and Conery 2000; Ohta 2003)
   • novel genetic material (Knox et al. 1996; Park et al. 1996)
   • novel genetically-regulated abilities (Prijambada et al. 1995)

I know mutations exist but show me a good one or one that is a functioning new organ. All I've ever seen is ones that end up killing the animal

You have a valid point there. The mutant biblical creationist which evolved into the later intelligent design creationist ended up killing the credibility of the species.

You don't answer questions and then just say you're wrong basically. Go fuck monkeys to try to make yourself evolved. Maybe you'll make a new form of AIDS

 

[S.J.]

CB102 Mutations adding information

Claim CB102:
Mutations are random noise; they do not add information. Evolution cannot cause an increase in information.
Source:
AIG, n.d. Creation Education Center. Doing a Report on Creation vs. Evolution Answers in Genesis


Response:

1. It is hard to understand how anyone could make this claim, since anything mutations can do, mutations can undo. Some mutations add information to a genome; some subtract it. Creationists get by with this claim only by leaving the term "information" undefined, impossibly vague, or constantly shifting. By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve. We have observed the evolution of
   • increased genetic variety in a population (Lenski 1995; Lenski et al. 1991)
   • increased genetic material (Alves et al. 2001; Brown et al. 1998; Hughes and Friedman 2003; Lynch and Conery 2000; Ohta 2003)
   • novel genetic material (Knox et al. 1996; Park et al. 1996)
   • novel genetically-regulated abilities (Prijambada et al. 1995)

I like how you copy and paste other people's statements but have none of your own.

I like how the facts of evolution, which you deny, cause you to whine and moan when they're presented to you.

Stop whining.

You need to find a smart person to sit with you while you post so you don't have to keep repeating the same response over and over.

 

[S.J.]

Read the first line in your copy and paste link. They admit they have no proof.

"Nothing in the real world can be proved with absolute certainty."

As you have been told repeatedly - and have ignored invincibly - the thread is about evidence, not proof.

Well, the only evidence any of you have posted is evidence of similarities. There is absolutely no evidence that any species "evolved" into another. You'll never get past speculation.

 

[Hollie]

CB102 Mutations adding information

Claim CB102:
Mutations are random noise; they do not add information. Evolution cannot cause an increase in information.
Source:
AIG, n.d. Creation Education Center. Doing a Report on Creation vs. Evolution Answers in Genesis


Response:

1. It is hard to understand how anyone could make this claim, since anything mutations can do, mutations can undo. Some mutations add information to a genome; some subtract it. Creationists get by with this claim only by leaving the term "information" undefined, impossibly vague, or constantly shifting. By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve. We have observed the evolution of
   • increased genetic variety in a population (Lenski 1995; Lenski et al. 1991)
   • increased genetic material (Alves et al. 2001; Brown et al. 1998; Hughes and Friedman 2003; Lynch and Conery 2000; Ohta 2003)
   • novel genetic material (Knox et al. 1996; Park et al. 1996)
   • novel genetically-regulated abilities (Prijambada et al. 1995)

I like how you copy and paste other people's statements but have none of your own.

I like how the facts of evolution, which you deny, cause you to whine and moan when they're presented to you.

Stop whining.

You need to find a smart person to sit with you while you post so you don't have to keep repeating the same response over and over.

As we have seen throughout this thread, you're just whining about your YEC'Ist beliefs being refuted by the evidence and the facts of evolution.

Stop whining. You may eventually evolve from non-critically thinking zealot to a Marshall Applewhite wannabe.

 

[Hollie]

Read the first line in your copy and paste link. They admit they have no proof.

"Nothing in the real world can be proved with absolute certainty."

As you have been told repeatedly - and have ignored invincibly - the thread is about evidence, not proof.

Well, the only evidence any of you have posted is evidence of similarities. There is absolutely no evidence that any species "evolved" into another. You'll never get past speculation.

Transitional species and the process/evidence of speciation are just the gawds playing a cruel joke on you.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

CB102 Mutations adding information

Claim CB102:
Mutations are random noise; they do not add information. Evolution cannot cause an increase in information.
Source:
AIG, n.d. Creation Education Center. Doing a Report on Creation vs. Evolution Answers in Genesis


Response:

1. It is hard to understand how anyone could make this claim, since anything mutations can do, mutations can undo. Some mutations add information to a genome; some subtract it. Creationists get by with this claim only by leaving the term "information" undefined, impossibly vague, or constantly shifting. By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve. We have observed the evolution of
   • increased genetic variety in a population (Lenski 1995; Lenski et al. 1991)
   • increased genetic material (Alves et al. 2001; Brown et al. 1998; Hughes and Friedman 2003; Lynch and Conery 2000; Ohta 2003)
   • novel genetic material (Knox et al. 1996; Park et al. 1996)
   • novel genetically-regulated abilities (Prijambada et al. 1995)

I like how you copy and paste other people's statements but have none of your own.

I like how the facts of evolution, which you deny, cause you to whine and moan when they're presented to you.

Stop whining.

You need to find a smart person to sit with you while you post so you don't have to keep repeating the same response over and over.

As we have seen throughout this thread, you're just whining about your YEC'Ist beliefs being refuted by the evidence and the facts of evolution.

Stop whining. You may eventually evolve from non-critically thinking zealot to a Marshall Applewhite wannabe.

Seriously man. How old are you? I hope you say you're at least over 60 cause you definitely have severe memory loss. You've said that same thing like 5 times.

 

[S.J.]

CB102 Mutations adding information

Claim CB102:
Mutations are random noise; they do not add information. Evolution cannot cause an increase in information.
Source:
AIG, n.d. Creation Education Center. Doing a Report on Creation vs. Evolution Answers in Genesis


Response:

1. It is hard to understand how anyone could make this claim, since anything mutations can do, mutations can undo. Some mutations add information to a genome; some subtract it. Creationists get by with this claim only by leaving the term "information" undefined, impossibly vague, or constantly shifting. By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve. We have observed the evolution of
   • increased genetic variety in a population (Lenski 1995; Lenski et al. 1991)
   • increased genetic material (Alves et al. 2001; Brown et al. 1998; Hughes and Friedman 2003; Lynch and Conery 2000; Ohta 2003)
   • novel genetic material (Knox et al. 1996; Park et al. 1996)
   • novel genetically-regulated abilities (Prijambada et al. 1995)

I like how you copy and paste other people's statements but have none of your own.

I like how the facts of evolution, which you deny, cause you to whine and moan when they're presented to you.

Stop whining.

You need to find a smart person to sit with you while you post so you don't have to keep repeating the same response over and over.

As we have seen throughout this thread, you're just whining about your YEC'Ist beliefs being refuted by the evidence and the facts of evolution.

Stop whining. You may eventually evolve from non-critically thinking zealot to a Marshall Applewhite wannabe.

How old did you say you were?