Where is this mountain of evidence for evolution?

View attachment 39928
More evidence:

New study hints at spontaneous appearance of primordial DNA -- ScienceDaily

New study hints at spontaneous appearance of primordial DNA
Date:
April 7, 2015

Source:
University of Colorado at Boulder

Summary:
The self-organization properties of DNA-like molecular fragments four billion years ago may have guided their own growth into repeating chemical chains long enough to act as a basis for primitive life, says a new study.

More at the link.
spontaneous generation...lol
View attachment 39949

Proving yet again that you are utterly incapable of making a reasonable, mature argument for your position.
You obviously haven't read any of Hollie's posts.
 
View attachment 39928
More evidence:

New study hints at spontaneous appearance of primordial DNA -- ScienceDaily

New study hints at spontaneous appearance of primordial DNA
Date:
April 7, 2015

Source:
University of Colorado at Boulder

Summary:
The self-organization properties of DNA-like molecular fragments four billion years ago may have guided their own growth into repeating chemical chains long enough to act as a basis for primitive life, says a new study.

More at the link.
spontaneous generation...lol
View attachment 39949

Proving yet again that you are utterly incapable of making a reasonable, mature argument for your position.
You obviously haven't read any of Hollie's posts.
You poor, dear. You want to be accepted as being capable of making a reasoned argument yet your only contribution to this thread has been pointless and baseless denials regarding the validity of science facts regarding biological evolution. Why do you presume an entitlement to be accepted as something other than a pointless spammer?
 
View attachment 39928
More evidence:

New study hints at spontaneous appearance of primordial DNA -- ScienceDaily

New study hints at spontaneous appearance of primordial DNA
Date:
April 7, 2015

Source:
University of Colorado at Boulder

Summary:
The self-organization properties of DNA-like molecular fragments four billion years ago may have guided their own growth into repeating chemical chains long enough to act as a basis for primitive life, says a new study.

More at the link.
spontaneous generation...lol
View attachment 39949

Proving yet again that you are utterly incapable of making a reasonable, mature argument for your position.
You obviously haven't read any of Hollie's posts.
You poor, dear. You want to be accepted as being capable of making a reasoned argument yet your only contribution to this thread has been pointless and baseless denials regarding the validity of science facts regarding biological evolution. Why do you presume an entitlement to be accepted as something other than a pointless spammer?
See what I mean? :lol:
 

Proving yet again that you are utterly incapable of making a reasonable, mature argument for your position.
You obviously haven't read any of Hollie's posts.
You poor, dear. You want to be accepted as being capable of making a reasoned argument yet your only contribution to this thread has been pointless and baseless denials regarding the validity of science facts regarding biological evolution. Why do you presume an entitlement to be accepted as something other than a pointless spammer?
See what I mean? :lol:

I see only your inability to offer a coherent comment. This thread is not about your tender sensibilities being offended by science or your YEC'ist beliefs being refuted. Stop whining.
 
Humans As a Case Study for theEvidence of Evolution


SEVEN LINES OF EVIDENCE FROM BIOLOGY

  1. Hierarchical (Taxonomic) Classification (Linnaeus)
    • primates naturally forming nested hierarchical groupings
  2. Comparative Anatomy
    • homologies
    • general adaptive attributes of all primates (including humans)
    • distinctive brachiating anatomy possessed by hominoids
  3. Comparative Embryology (Ernst Haeckel)
  4. Comparative Biochemistry (1950's)
    • served as a substantial test of evolutionary theory (and illustrates concordance between independent lines of evidence)
    • amino acid sequences of proteins (genetic products)
    • chromosomal banding patterns (genetic loci)
    • DNA structure itself (genes)
  5. Adaptive Compromises or "Imperfections"
    • "contrivances" (Charles Darwin)
    • "evolution as tinkering" (Francois Jacob)
    • human examples:
      • pelvic structure adapted both for fully erect bipedalism AND giving birth to big-brained babies
      • lowered larynx an adaptation for speech BUT also a liability in that it makes us more likely to choke compared to other mammals
  6. Vestigial Structures
    • "senseless signs of history" (Stephen Jay Gould)
    • human examples: ears with muscles, Darwin's tubercle, appendix, little toe
  7. Biogeography
    • refers to the geographical distribution of similar species as a result of shared ancestry; for example, lemurs on Madagascar, New World and Old World monkeys, lesser apes
    • Darwin's 1871 prediction about finding fossils of early humans in Africa
FIVE LINES OF EVIDENCE FROM PALEONTOLOGY & ARCHAEOLOGY
  1. "Paleo-biogeography"
    • earliest hominid fossils are from Africa as predicted by Darwin and evolutionary theory
  2. Fossil Sequence
    • more "primitive" (less modern forms) found earlier and before more "evolved" (more modern) forms
  3. Fossil Intermediates
    • intermediate fossils theoretically should and DO display a combination of primitive and derived features: Mosaic Specimens
      • "Lucy" (Hadar, Ethiopia; 3 mya)
      • various archaic/"modern" specimens (for example, Jebel Irhoud, Predmost)
  4. Ecological Coherence Of Fossil Assemblages
    • fossil assemblages represent ecologically-sensible collections of fossil species (contra the "Flood chaos" model)
    • virtually any hominid site but especially those with both hominid remains and faunal and/or floral fossils
  5. Chronological Sequence Of Stone Tools
    • the same sort of developmental sequence seen in more "primitive" to more "advanced" fossils is seen in the archaeological sequence of stone tools from cruder to more sophisticated and refined
 

Proving yet again that you are utterly incapable of making a reasonable, mature argument for your position.
You obviously haven't read any of Hollie's posts.
You poor, dear. You want to be accepted as being capable of making a reasoned argument yet your only contribution to this thread has been pointless and baseless denials regarding the validity of science facts regarding biological evolution. Why do you presume an entitlement to be accepted as something other than a pointless spammer?
See what I mean? :lol:

I see only your inability to offer a coherent comment. This thread is not about your tender sensibilities being offended by science or your YEC'ist beliefs being refuted. Stop whining.
And once again you prove me right. :lol:
 
Proving yet again that you are utterly incapable of making a reasonable, mature argument for your position.
You obviously haven't read any of Hollie's posts.
You poor, dear. You want to be accepted as being capable of making a reasoned argument yet your only contribution to this thread has been pointless and baseless denials regarding the validity of science facts regarding biological evolution. Why do you presume an entitlement to be accepted as something other than a pointless spammer?
See what I mean? :lol:

I see only your inability to offer a coherent comment. This thread is not about your tender sensibilities being offended by science or your YEC'ist beliefs being refuted. Stop whining.
And once again you prove me right. :lol:
Once again you prove you're a pointless spammer. No one but you is responsible for your inadequacies.

CA202 Evolution proof
 
Proving yet again that you are utterly incapable of making a reasonable, mature argument for your position.
You obviously haven't read any of Hollie's posts.
You poor, dear. You want to be accepted as being capable of making a reasoned argument yet your only contribution to this thread has been pointless and baseless denials regarding the validity of science facts regarding biological evolution. Why do you presume an entitlement to be accepted as something other than a pointless spammer?
See what I mean? :lol:

I see only your inability to offer a coherent comment. This thread is not about your tender sensibilities being offended by science or your YEC'ist beliefs being refuted. Stop whining.
And once again you prove me right. :lol:
You're a whiner. :lol:

Evolution is a Fact and a Theory
Evolution is a Fact and a Theory
by Laurence Moran
 
You obviously haven't read any of Hollie's posts.
You poor, dear. You want to be accepted as being capable of making a reasoned argument yet your only contribution to this thread has been pointless and baseless denials regarding the validity of science facts regarding biological evolution. Why do you presume an entitlement to be accepted as something other than a pointless spammer?
See what I mean? :lol:

I see only your inability to offer a coherent comment. This thread is not about your tender sensibilities being offended by science or your YEC'ist beliefs being refuted. Stop whining.
And once again you prove me right. :lol:
Once again you prove you're a pointless spammer. No one but you is responsible for your inadequacies.

CA202 Evolution proof
Read the first line in your copy and paste link. They admit they have no proof.

"Nothing in the real world can be proved with absolute certainty."
 
You obviously haven't read any of Hollie's posts.
You poor, dear. You want to be accepted as being capable of making a reasoned argument yet your only contribution to this thread has been pointless and baseless denials regarding the validity of science facts regarding biological evolution. Why do you presume an entitlement to be accepted as something other than a pointless spammer?
See what I mean? :lol:

I see only your inability to offer a coherent comment. This thread is not about your tender sensibilities being offended by science or your YEC'ist beliefs being refuted. Stop whining.
And once again you prove me right. :lol:
You're a whiner. :lol:

Evolution is a Fact and a Theory
Evolution is a Fact and a Theory
by Laurence Moran
I'm not whining, I'm laughing. You are an idiot.
 
The Origin of Whales and the Power of Independent Evidence

The Origin of Whales and the Power of Independent Evidence
by Raymond Sutera
Copyright © 2001

[posted: August 10, 2001]

This article originally appeared in Reports of the National Center for Science Education,
a publication of The National Center for Science Education.

ambulocetus.gif

Thewissen and others (1994) published this reconstruction of the skeleton ofAmbulocetans natans (redrawn for RNCSE by Janet Dreyer).

thicksep.gif

H.gif
ow do you convince a creationist that a fossil is a transitional fossil? Give up? It is a trick question. You cannot do it. There is no convincing someone who has his mind made up already. But sometimes, it is even worse. Sometimes, when you point out a fossil that falls into the middle of a gap and is a superb morphological and chronological intermediate, you are met with the response: "Well, now you have two gaps where you only had one before! You are losing ground!"
 
You poor, dear. You want to be accepted as being capable of making a reasoned argument yet your only contribution to this thread has been pointless and baseless denials regarding the validity of science facts regarding biological evolution. Why do you presume an entitlement to be accepted as something other than a pointless spammer?
See what I mean? :lol:

I see only your inability to offer a coherent comment. This thread is not about your tender sensibilities being offended by science or your YEC'ist beliefs being refuted. Stop whining.
And once again you prove me right. :lol:
Once again you prove you're a pointless spammer. No one but you is responsible for your inadequacies.

CA202 Evolution proof
Read the first line in your copy and paste link. They admit they have no proof.

"Nothing in the real world can be proved with absolute certainty."
As usual, you sweepingly don't understand..... even the most simple concepts.
 
You poor, dear. You want to be accepted as being capable of making a reasoned argument yet your only contribution to this thread has been pointless and baseless denials regarding the validity of science facts regarding biological evolution. Why do you presume an entitlement to be accepted as something other than a pointless spammer?
See what I mean? :lol:

I see only your inability to offer a coherent comment. This thread is not about your tender sensibilities being offended by science or your YEC'ist beliefs being refuted. Stop whining.
And once again you prove me right. :lol:
You're a whiner. :lol:

Evolution is a Fact and a Theory
Evolution is a Fact and a Theory
by Laurence Moran
I'm not whining, I'm laughing. You are an idiot.

As usual, you're left to whining like a child who has been scolded for bad behavior and sent to his room for a time out.

For all the evidence that's presented for the fact of biological evolution, you continue to fail at every post to offer even the hint of a refutation.

Your YEC'ist beliefs cannot withstand the glaring light of facts.

Stop whining.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom