Exactly. Your religion has done nothing.
Zone1 Where does it say in the Bible only adults can be baptized?
- Thread starter forkintheroad7
- Start date
Exactly. Your religion has done nothing.
lol... Say the dingbot desperately clinging to the irrational religious flotsam of a dying age.
Irrational is you arguing religion. You do your tribe proud.
Nonsense.
I am not arguing 'religion'. I am separating wheat from the chaff, sheep from goats, by simply pointing out the fact that you claim to worship God but get down on your knees in the deranged adoration of a matzo made by human hands and eat it for spiritual life which is a violation of the first command under penalty of death, not to mention insane. Defying Divine Law is not the way to eternal life. Your Roman Church lies. Duh. True? So when political actors and lying frauds use religion to veil their corruption and justify their false claim to moral authority in order to impose through legislation and force their perverse view of the world on everyone else it becomes a duty to confront the lies upon which they base their position. It would be very irrational to do nothing especially since your sin is as obvious as a white boulder in the middle of a plowed field.
Exposing your nakedness, your bullshit, is easy as throwing a lit match into a pile of dead wood.
If you say so.
My "tribe", hears the will of God and does it which has nothing to do with religion or pride.
Your tribe must be confounded. Like I have said, if you weren't such a sanctimonious asshole I would feel sorry for you. Where are all the other catholics defending your faith in brazen lies?
Maybe you should call in your superior in the hierarchy of hell for help. You are just too dumb and Ace Nova couldn't cut the mustard. Oh no! Ominous storm clouds are gathering. Very scary!
lol, so I guess its time to take a nap on this little boat in the middle of the raging sea, lol,
I'll be waiting.
Last edited:
Nonsense.
I am not arguing 'religion'. I am separating wheat from the chaff, sheep from goats, by simply pointing out the fact that you claim to worship God but get down on your knees in the deranged adoration of a matzo made by human hands and eat it for spiritual life which is a violation of the first command under penalty of death, not to mention insane. Defying Divine Law is not the way to eternal life. Your Roman Church lies. Duh. True? So when political actors and lying frauds use religion to veil their corruption and justify their false claim to moral authority in order to impose through legislation and force their perverse view of the world on everyone else it becomes a duty to confront the lies upon which they base their position. It would be very irrational to do nothing especially since your sin is as obvious as a white boulder in the middle of a plowed field.
Exposing your nakedness, your bullshit, is easy as throwing a lit match into a pile of dead wood.
If you say so.
My "tribe", hears the will of God and does it which has nothing to do with religion or pride.
Your tribe must be confounded. Like I have said, if you weren't such a sanctimonious asshole I would feel sorry for you. Where are all the other catholics defending your faith in brazen lies?
Maybe you should call in your superior in the hierarchy of hell for help. You are just too dumb and Ace Nova couldn't cut the mustard. Oh no! Ominous storm clouds are gathering. Very scary!
lol, so I guess its time to take a nap on this little boat in the middle of the raging sea, lol,
I'll be waiting.
I don't argue against the FSM because it would be irrational to do so. Fuck off. Your religion blows.
Wrong.
Nonsense. You have no idea what you speak of.
His only 'religion' is to destroy the spirituality of others.
He is the destroyer - leave it be.
BreezeWood
VIP Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 19,317
- 1,593
- 85
is there a reference for what you claim ...
or just blind stupidity used for your christian way of life..
What type of "reference" are you looking for? Even if I were to post references dating the books of the New Testament to the 1st century, would you believe it? And if so, would it change the way you feel?
BreezeWood
VIP Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 19,317
- 1,593
- 85
the appendix to the christian bible for the documents they saved to write their document ... for literal clarification - that does not exist as none were ever used. or in most part ever existed - and why references to liberation theology, self determination why those people gave their lives in the 1st century are excluded from that book.
ace in fact is an unverifiable jew w/ their own madeup messiah - that never existed.
There is a theory that a "Q Document" existed as early as 30 - 40 AD:
Synoptic Gospels and the nature of Q
[edit]Main article: Synoptic Gospels
The relationship among the three synoptic gospels goes beyond mere similarity in viewpoint. The gospels often recount the same stories, usually in the same order, sometimes using the same words. Scholars note that the similarities among Mark, Matthew, and Luke are too great to be coincidental.[22][23]
If the two-source hypothesis is correct, then Q would probably have been a written document. If Q was a shared oral tradition, it is unlikely that it could account for the nearly identical word-for-word similarities between Matthew and Luke when quoting Q material. Similarly, it is possible to deduce that Q was written in Greek. If the Gospels of Matthew and Luke were referring to a document that had been written in some other language (such as Aramaic), it is highly unlikely that two independent translations would have exactly the same wording.[24]
The Q document must have been composed before Matthew and Luke; some scholars even suggest that Q predated Mark. A date for the final Q document is often placed in the 40s or 50s of the 1st century, with some arguing its so-called sapiential layer (1Q, containing six wisdom speeches) was written as early as the 30s.[25]
If Q existed, physical copies of it have since been lost. Some scholars, however, believe it can be partially reconstructed by examining elements common to Matthew and Luke (but absent from Mark). Versions of this reconstructed Q do not describe the events of Jesus' life: Q does not mention Jesus' birth, his selection of the 12 disciples, his crucifixion, or the resurrection. Instead, it appears to be a collection of Jesus' sayings and quotations.
Case for Q
[edit]The case for Q's existence follows from the argument that neither Matthew nor Luke is directly dependent on the other in the double tradition (defined by New Testament scholars as material that Matthew and Luke share that does not appear in Mark). However, the verbal agreement between Matthew and Luke is so close in some parts of the double tradition that the most reasonable explanation for this agreement is common dependence on a written source or sources. Even if Matthew and Luke are independent (see Marcan priority), the Q hypothesis states that they used a common document. Arguments for Q being a written document include:
- Sometimes the exactness in wording is striking, for example, Matthew 6:24 and Luke 16:13,[26] (27 and 28 Greek words respectively); Matthew 7:7–8 and Luke 11:9–10,[27] (24 Greek words each).
- There is sometimes commonality in order between the two, for example the Sermon on the Plain and Sermon on the Mount.
- The presence of doublets, where Matthew and Luke sometimes each present two versions of a similar saying but in different context, only one of those versions appearing in Mark. Doublets may be considered a sign of two written sources, i.e., Mark and Q.
- Luke mentions that he knows of other written sources of Jesus' life, and that he has investigated in order to gather the most information.[28][29]
Q source - Wikipedia
You equate my God , the Father of Jesus, who doesn't give a fuck about diet, fashion, or the sexual preferences of consenting adult bipeds, never diddled a virgin to become a Jewish man only to abolish his own laws, perform supernatural demonstrations of divine power over reality, say nutty things that no one understood, to become a perfect human sacrifice so that 'believers', idiots like you, who celebrate his death can sin with impunity for life, as long as you defy the first commandment, by worshipping a nonexistent trinity, and desecrate the teaching of Jesus, by worshiping and eating a lifeless matzo made by human hands for spiritual life with the FSM?
Got it.
Just one question.
If you don't argue against the FSM why do you argue with my every post like a deranged stalker?
Brilliant retort.
There you go again!
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Biden has one year left to live,,,,,deceiving voters about his medical crisis..- Started by Freedomisneverfree
- Replies: 11
-
-
-
putin´s Colonel General Andrey Mordvichev: "the war in Ukraine a "stepping stone" before the march on Europe"- Started by Litwin
- Replies: 10
-
