When do ICE agents start getting charged with murder?

Do you not comprehend the insanity of your post?

It is the Pope’s duty before God to speak out against war and injustice, and the slaughter of innocents.

Perhaps, if Trump didn’t behave in an illegal, immoral, and inhumane manner, there would be no need to call out his behaviours.

There are no winners and losers in any war. Everybody loses on both sides. The “winner” soldiers are just as dead and wounded as the losers. The dollar and cents costs just as great.

The money Trump spent could have paid for health care and education of Americans. It could have built roads and bridges at home instead of blowing them up thousands of miles away.

Pointless and stupid.
and yet not a word about Putin and his war. Go figure.
 
You might not want to carry a gun into a protest and fight with law enforcement regardless. Dead right, or dead wrong. You know the drill
I expect any professional law enforcement agency to act in professional manner.4 men tackling a guy to the ground and rubbing his face in the pavement is something thugs do.
 
Do you mean the millions of illegal aliens?That invaded our country?

I don't know if it's fair to call that an invasion since president biden actually invited them in.
If that were only true. I noticed you never replied to the compelling argument I gave about Pete Hegseth .I understand best to be silent about that colossal mistake. Why.not threat n war crimes when they've already gotten away with them ( for now ). Can't blame trump for calling neide OMG preemptively pardoning everyone with all the corruption he's created.
 
Last edited:
I expect any professional law enforcement agency to act in professional manner.4 men tackling a guy to the ground and rubbing his face in the pavement is something thugs do.
Depends on what happens before, during and after . Taking down criminals is rough work . Pansies have an issue about that
 
If that were only true. I noticed you never replied to the compelling argument I gave about Pete Hegseth .I understand best to be silent about that colossal mistake.
I must have missed that compelling argument. I'll check itvoutvand respond.

Meanwhile is it a yes or a no: are protesters/rioters interfering with and assaulting Ice officers or not?
 
I must have missed that compelling argument. I'll check itvoutvand respond.

Meanwhile is it a yes or a no: are protesters/rioters interfering with and assaulting Ice officers or not?
Actually no , not when they are dealing with masked thugs..
 
Do you not comprehend the insanity of your post?

It is the Pope’s duty before God to speak out against war and injustice, and the slaughter of innocents.

Perhaps, if Trump didn’t behave in an illegal, immoral, and inhumane manner, there would be no need to call out his behaviours.

There are no winners and losers in any war. Everybody loses on both sides. The “winner” soldiers are just as dead and wounded as the losers. The dollar and cents costs just as great.

The money Trump spent could have paid for health care and education of Americans. It could have built roads and bridges at home instead of blowing them up thousands of miles away.

Pointless and stupid.
/----/ The Pope was deafeningly silent on the atrocities the Iranians committed on their own people.
 
I expect any professional law enforcement agency to act in professional manner.4 men tackling a guy to the ground and rubbing his face in the pavement is something thugs do.
Regardless, pretty was an asshole and shouldn't have had a gun for sure. Maybe the protesters shouldn't be so vulgar and shrill and they wouldn't get hurt.
Didn't your mother teach you guys how to respect authority
 
/----/ The Pope was deafeningly silent on the atrocities the Iranians committed on their own people.
He did speak out against the Iranian leaders who were killing protestors.it's on something called X . couldn't access it.
 
Last edited:
Actually no , not when they are dealing with masked thugs..
See, your whole argument relies on name calling, backed up by personal attacks on anyone who disagrees with you.

I didn't see any argument from you about Hegseth. Was it on this thread?

I'll respond to it, if you can agree to refrain from name calling and personal attacks.
 
See, your whole argument relies on name calling, backed up by personal attacks on anyone who disagrees with you.

I didn't see any argument from you about Hegseth. Was it on this thread?

I'll respond to it, if you can agree to refrain from name calling and personal attacks.
I did not call.youany names. Post 669.
 
15th post
Let me just lay out how Pretti and Good came to be killed.

1) Joe Biden spent 4 years letting in as many unvetted and unvaccinated foreigners as were willing to illegally cross the border.
2) The American voter overwhelmingly elected Donald Trump, who promised to deport these illegal aliens, prioritizing the worst of the worst but promising that no illegal would get a pass.
3) Many local and state jurisdications refused to comply with legal warrants to be served by ICE officers* on the worst of the worst, as they were released by blue judges who believing in letting the worst of the worst free.
4) In order to follow the law, ICE officers were then required to serve these legal and valid warrants in communities rather than at jail, as they had wanted.
5)Democratic elected officials and party leaders encouraged "protesters" to interfere with ICE officers.
6) The interefers were successful in slowing down ICE, but not in driving these federal law enforcement officers away from serving the lawfall warrants.
7) The "protesters" began attacking the federal officers rather than just hindering them.
8) A couple of them pushed it too far and ended up taking dirt naps.

The fault for all of that is squarely on the narrow shoulders of Democrats.
 
Let me just lay out how Pretti and Good came to be killed.

1) Joe Biden spent 4 years letting in as many unvetted and unvaccinated foreigners as were willing to illegally cross the border.
2) The American voter overwhelmingly elected Donald Trump, who promised to deport these illegal aliens, prioritizing the worst of the worst but promising that no illegal would get a pass.
3) Many local and state jurisdications refused to comply with legal warrants to be served by ICE officers* on the worst of the worst, as they were released by blue judges who believing in letting the worst of the worst free.
4) In order to follow the law, ICE officers were then required to serve these legal and valid warrants in communities rather than at jail, as they had wanted.
5)Democratic elected officials and party leaders encouraged "protesters" to interfere with ICE officers.
6) The interefers were successful in slowing down ICE, but not in driving these federal law enforcement officers away from serving the lawfall warrants.
7) The "protesters" began attacking the federal officers rather than just hindering them.
8) A couple of them pushed it too far and ended up taking dirt naps.

The fault for all of that is squarely on the narrow shoulders of Democrats.
Of course , no accountability for trump or anyone else in this email now station
Our government doesn't work like that.
 
I did not call.youany names. Post 669.
You called Federal Officers enforcing lawfull warants "masked thugs." You realize that is not a logical argument, It's just childishness?
I was a nurse for over 50 years. I am very observant person. Most of the people who know me know that. Let me point out one example to help you understand why I do not trust this administration stall. So they start bombing drug boats.i'm fine with that. But then things changed. Every time the bomb one they immediately releas the video coverage to the public. In this one case they don't . After being pressured to releas it they finally do. It is obviousfromthe images that it is not a drug boat. People on both sides of the aisle recalling for an investigation and the release out all the video involved. At first trump says ofcorse we'll release it. Then he changes his mind and says they won't.tjen he finally says he'll leave it up to Hegseth to release it. Whenever did trump handed the decision over to the person responsible for the cover-up. They sibsequentially released propaganda photos comparing a real drug boat to a fishing trawler.Another obvious deception. If they wanted to be truthful they would have posted the real drug baamiat photo with 2 armed men guarding the boat to the boat in question trust had 11 passengers on iandno room for drugs. But that was not their goal. The truth is the last thing they want to admit to. That's whytheymurdered the last two survivors.
Not much of a compelling argument, there. It is an argument, so I assume you know the difference between an argument and perpersonal attacks/name calling.

Your argument is twofold: 1) That you have looked at the pictures and determined that it is not a drug boat. 2) that you know that there were 11 people on board the boat that was sunk, and that you know that with eleven people, no drugs would fit.

So:

1) How did you determine it was not a drug boat, showing the picture with a reasonably detailed explanation

2) How do you know that a boat with eleven people cannot have any drugs on it? Do you mean literally no drugs at all, or no large number of bails of marijuana, not a single 1Kg brick of cocaine, or what do you mean?
 
Last edited:
Of course , no accountability for trump or anyone else in this email now station
Our government doesn't work like that.
This is what I mean by no argument.

You cannot dispute a single point in that list, nor can you say what should be added, if anything.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom