Rigby5
Diamond Member
You have no way of knowing if she shot him by accident, or if she shot him (properly) in self-defense, by reason of his hands disappearing from her view. My guess is the latter, because it would be inconceivable for a 26 year veteran to have not done that.
All the rest of this (taser talk etc) is nothing but a ramification of the law enforcement cluelessness of the left, including those in authoritative prosecutorial positions (as clueless as all the rest, yet dangerously in positions of power).
You are totally off the mark here.
We could all see his hands in the video because he had just started the car, with one hand on the ignition, one hand on the wheel, and then trying to shift into drive.
At no time was there any risk of any unseen hand going for a weapon.
But the reason she was NOT guilty of a crime is lack of intent.
And being a 26 year veteran is irrelevant if such an encounter never happened before, which is likely.