By the way, Beck is in a terrible time slot--middle of the afternoon in the west and drive time in the east. But lately his ratings are exceeding Hannity who has held the No. 2 spot for like forever. Doesn't look to me like Beck's ratings are slipping all that much. His radio program is holding its own too.
And I DO provide links.
Ratings - TVNewser
1. Most people either have T-vo or DVR capability; plus his program is rerun at a later time.
2. Even Hannity's ratings have dropped, so what does that tell you? Beck has lost about 40% of his audience in the past 3 months. OH!!! Here's a LINK! Imagine that. Add it to the others
I've already posted. And if The Daily Beast turns you off, you can always click the embedded links for their source(s).
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity Ratings Drop: Right-Wing Talk Is Dying - The Daily Beast
I don't go to the Daily Beast for Nielson ratings. If you bothered to look at the link showing the actual ratings, you'll see that Fox overall is beating the other three cable news combined and Beck is beating the pants off ANYBODY the other cable news puts up. So if anybody at Fox is losing ratings, so is everybody else on all cable news networks.
The DB article does link the actual ratings. So find the exact same information in one of your favorite right wing sites if you don't believe the Daily Beast. Also, if you combine all other cable and network newscasts, far more people are watching at least ONE OF THOSE than are tuned in to Fox at the same time, so Fox's ratings become skewed by that fact.
And despite the horns and tails you Leftwingers are so desperate to attach to him, Beck is just a guy who is much better informed than most because he studies this stuff, but he is a fallible human being and sometimes has feet of clay as we all do. He repeatedly admonishes his audience to not accept what he is saying because he says it; don't believe something because he believes it; don't assume something is right because he is teaching it. Instead go to the sources he used and check it out for yourself.
Why does he find it necessary to put caveats in at all? If he would just stop with the vitriol, embellishments, outright lies, and stupid predictions, he'd be more accepted. Notice I said STUPID predictions.
Name me ANYBODY on MSNBC or CNN or HLN who does that?
They don't have to because 99% of the time, CNN and MSNBC are discussing issues with guests, so you get it from the proverbial horse's mouth. I don't know about HLN--never watch it anymore.
I often disagree with Beck's conclusion on this or that, but he always has a credible rationale for what he says. And I have caught Beck in a wrong fact here and there, but that's pretty rare, and he is good to own up to a mistake when he realizes he has made one.
But then I can listen to somebody objectively without demonizing him even if I disagree with him.