Captain Creeper
Diamond Member
- Oct 13, 2025
- 3,035
- 3,485
- 1,918
MPs Condemn 'Barbaric' Belfast Attack, Leftists Warn 'Far-Right' Backlash
British lawmakers have condemned the apparent attempted beheading on the streets of Belfast as "sickening", "barbaric", and "medieval".
www.breitbart.com
Ah, yet another savage beheading attempt by ... who? A Christian perp? No. a Buddhist? No. Then who? Who would do something so horrible and disgusting in the name of their god?
Islam
No loving god would condone this. Of course, Allah is not a loving god, is he? Oh, sure, he is loving toward his muslim minions. But that is it. Allah, in fact, suffers from what we here in the western world would call a "ethnocentric bias". Allah does not promote diversity, or love his non-muslim neighbor. Rather, he teaches to subjugate or destroy the non-believers. It is all there in the Allah-Bible.
To be sure, Yahweh could be rather hard too. But, Yahweh did not molest little girls are preach destruction of all infidels. That is a uniquely muslim thing. Moreover, and with many religions, there will be fringes. Let's liken this to the old McDonald's advertising with the make-believe characters:
Ronald McDonald, the Crew Chief
The Hamburglar: the anti-hero
Grimace: the homosexual
Those little burger guys: burger nymphs
If you follow the McDonald's narrative strictly, as a fundamentalist would follow his or her religion, then Ronald is god, and Hamburglar is the antithesis (i.e., the devil; evil). Ronald promotes the good, while Hamburglar wants to deprive us of the good. However, if you look at this as an allegory rather than literally, it is merely a moral tale given to us for guidance, like "The Boy Who Cried Wolf.
I am not alleging that all muslims are wacky looney-tunes. There are plenty of moderates out there, just like with Christianity. However, it is worth noting that Christianity has a substantially higher rate of moderates and sanity. I based this upon my "life experience" (and the life experience of everyone else in the world). In the fringy muslim mind, Ronald McDonald is Allah, the Hamburglar is USA/Israel, and Grimace is running around with a suicide bomb strapped to him trying to murder them. Now, you may pause and say to yourself, "Hmmm .... That does not sound like the McDonald's world I grew up with. Sure, Grimace is a little ... odd. But a psycho murderer? Never!" You would be right, too. But if you set McDonald's World in, say, Iran, then THAT is exactly what would be going on there.
Anti-western muslim "activists" want to murder Jews, Americans, and all people western. They want to murder them, their children, their parents and grandparents, their culture, and wipe out all traces of them. They want to put their destruction on display with great pride. "Look, father! I severed the head of a Jew and now display it on my bicycle handlebars!!!" ... "Ah, very good, Ackmed!!!! Allah is pleased!".
We have seen these muslim murder enthusiasts use beheadings a number of times in the media in recent years. I do not know, but I suspect that beheading has some conextural basis in Islam with it being such a popular way to murder. We remember the video of poor western journalist beheaded by ISIS as he lay their away and screaming. And now, this muslimy practice reared its ugly head again today in Belfast by a muslim immigrant.
You have to ask yourself: What kind of god would send his followers out to do this? The answer is - not any sort of god you want to follow. But the muslims were born into their hell. They were conditioned by it. Heck, if you were reared by Satanists and only were around Satanists, then you would think that was ok. And frankly, it probably would be ok, so long as you do not go outside of your little twisted group spreading your crap and murdering non-believers. If that happens, then the non-Satanists will have to fight back and get rid of the threat to them.
Clearly, Islamism is a threat to the west. Thus, we are justified in acting to quash it. At the very least, it has to be contained. Now, we cannot always differentiate between good muslims and evil muslims. Thus, some of the moderate good muslims are going to have to be disadvantaged by our act of self-preservation. It is necessary. Sorry. Get over it. This is for our survival, and our culture's survival.
Think about those among us who would be against what I just said. The woke cries of racism and such. Clearly, their objections are contra western cultural survival. Why? Because a few moderate muslims are disadvantaged in the effort to prevent an evil on a much grander scale? Many moderate muslims hate the Islamists. I suspect that those objecting to our effort to protect ourselves in this context are more about destroying western culture than they are protecting the civil rights of individual muslims. AND HEREIN LIES THE TELL: Those objecting are collectivists, not individualists.
There is an evil alliance afoot, coupling the Islamist murderers with the neo-Marxist revolutionaries. In fact, it is really more like the neo-Marxists glomming onto the Islamists' cause. In the real world, the Islamists hate the western freaks, including the neo-Marxists. So, it is more of an ideological marriage.
