What say you

[OKTexas]

The investigation authorized by The President just completed is being released at the moment. What say you.

No idea what is in it

They won’t let us read it
What are they hiding.

Well you only have your mulatto messiah to blame, he made the agreement that established this is the process. Leave it to you commies to bitch about playing by the rules you set up.

.

 

[jc456]

The ironic thing about kavfefe is he thinks govt ASSUMPTION is enough to restrict our rights.
What a fucking JOKE he is

.

Look at his record man

So you are unable to provide an example with a substantiating link? You're as bad a witness as Ford. Ya got to fill in the details child.

.

It's not a secret. LOL

Brett Kavanaugh’s Fourth Amendment Blind Spot

Judge Kavanaugh on the Fourth Amendment - SCOTUSblog

but Trump and the gop want a Justice who is more for govt power than indiv rights. Look at the other three semifinalists.

so those are all the cases he ever worked on? It seems like he references studies and cases to make a decision. seems reasonable to me.

 

[jc456]

The investigation authorized by The President just completed is being released at the moment. What say you.

Silly question considering it hasn't ben made public.

Enough has been released to show we're still where we were a week ago. No surprises there.

.

grassley said it's where we'd be.

Any one with a brain knew they would come up with nothing new, the damn commies are idiots.

.

Yep, but Grassley being a gentleman, said ok, I'll do it but for only a limited scope. They all said alright, he then said it would only be a week long, they all said alright, agreed on the conditions. Then, once out of committee, it became, it ain't enough, it won't be thorough, blady, blady, blady-lee. They lost all respect. reneggers everyone.

why would any normal behaving human ever agree to a deal with a leftist demoloser?

 

[OKTexas]

The investigation authorized by The President just completed is being released at the moment. What say you.

Silly question considering it hasn't ben made public.

Enough has been released to show we're still where we were a week ago. No surprises there.

.

grassley said it's where we'd be.

Any one with a brain knew they would come up with nothing new, the damn commies are idiots.

.

Certainly if they didn't look at Kavenaugh's lies about drinking. Very thorough report. Well done. Now lets' confirm the guy.

Keep spewing those talking points and enjoy your new Justice.

.

 

[candycorn]

Investigations in general are usually lacking.

Rob Porter had a wife who filed and EPO against him. He was staff secretary at the White House. While the FBI may not have done a check on it, surely the Secret Service should have and not allowed this serial wife abuser anywhere near the President much less the sensitive information he may have held. PS: Kav had the same job under Bush.


For a thorough investigation you need a set up like Captain Mueller has; a staff of competent individuals who know what questions to ask and the authority to drill as deep as you need to drill. And you need time.

Kav's investigation is for a job; he's had it done six times already. Whatever the investigation entails; nothing has been found before that is disqualifying.

are you saying the fbi sucks?

No. I’m saying for a thorough investigation, you need a set up like we have for the special counsel. Someone who has the time, staff, and authority.

 

[jc456]

Investigations in general are usually lacking.

Rob Porter had a wife who filed and EPO against him. He was staff secretary at the White House. While the FBI may not have done a check on it, surely the Secret Service should have and not allowed this serial wife abuser anywhere near the President much less the sensitive information he may have held. PS: Kav had the same job under Bush.


For a thorough investigation you need a set up like Captain Mueller has; a staff of competent individuals who know what questions to ask and the authority to drill as deep as you need to drill. And you need time.

Kav's investigation is for a job; he's had it done six times already. Whatever the investigation entails; nothing has been found before that is disqualifying.

are you saying the fbi sucks?

No. I’m saying for a thorough investigation, you need a set up like we have for the special counsel. Someone who has the time, staff, and authority.

where's the precedence for such an investigation for a nominee to the supreme court? that's how we run our government by precedence.

 

[candycorn]

Investigations in general are usually lacking.

Rob Porter had a wife who filed and EPO against him. He was staff secretary at the White House. While the FBI may not have done a check on it, surely the Secret Service should have and not allowed this serial wife abuser anywhere near the President much less the sensitive information he may have held. PS: Kav had the same job under Bush.


For a thorough investigation you need a set up like Captain Mueller has; a staff of competent individuals who know what questions to ask and the authority to drill as deep as you need to drill. And you need time.

Kav's investigation is for a job; he's had it done six times already. Whatever the investigation entails; nothing has been found before that is disqualifying.

are you saying the fbi sucks?

No. I’m saying for a thorough investigation, you need a set up like we have for the special counsel. Someone who has the time, staff, and authority.

where's the precedence for such an investigation for a nominee to the supreme court? that's how we run our government by precedence.

Where is the precedence for holding a spot open for nearly a year by the Committee?

 

[TNHarley]

The ironic thing about kavfefe is he thinks govt ASSUMPTION is enough to restrict our rights.
What a fucking JOKE he is

.

Look at his record man

So you are unable to provide an example with a substantiating link? You're as bad a witness as Ford. Ya got to fill in the details child.

.

You think i am going to post his record? Lol
If you dont know, or care to, why even post about it?

 

[jc456]

Investigations in general are usually lacking.

Rob Porter had a wife who filed and EPO against him. He was staff secretary at the White House. While the FBI may not have done a check on it, surely the Secret Service should have and not allowed this serial wife abuser anywhere near the President much less the sensitive information he may have held. PS: Kav had the same job under Bush.


For a thorough investigation you need a set up like Captain Mueller has; a staff of competent individuals who know what questions to ask and the authority to drill as deep as you need to drill. And you need time.

Kav's investigation is for a job; he's had it done six times already. Whatever the investigation entails; nothing has been found before that is disqualifying.

are you saying the fbi sucks?

No. I’m saying for a thorough investigation, you need a set up like we have for the special counsel. Someone who has the time, staff, and authority.

where's the precedence for such an investigation for a nominee to the supreme court? that's how we run our government by precedence.

Where is the precedence for holding a spot open for nearly a year by the Committee?

are your referring to Garland? If you are, here it is from the '92. The Biden Rule:

In Context: The 'Biden Rule' on Supreme Court nominations in an election year

"McConnell is using Biden’s own words from 1992, when George H.W. Bush was president and Biden was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, to explain why he intends to block President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court pick in an election year.

"The Senate will continue to observe the Biden Rule so that the American people have a voice in this momentous decision" on who to name to the court, McConnell said in a March 16 speech on the floor of the Senate.

McConnell went on to quote some words from then-Judiciary Chairman Biden to show why the Senate’s disagreement with Obama is "about a principle, not a person.""

Dude, you all never know your facts. amazing shit.

 

[jc456]

The ironic thing about kavfefe is he thinks govt ASSUMPTION is enough to restrict our rights.
What a fucking JOKE he is

.

Look at his record man

So you are unable to provide an example with a substantiating link? You're as bad a witness as Ford. Ya got to fill in the details child.

.

You think i am going to post his record? Lol
If you dont know, or care to, why even post about it?

it's simple, did every ruling go against the people?

 

[Meister]

The ironic thing about kavfefe is he thinks govt ASSUMPTION is enough to restrict our rights.
What a fucking JOKE he is

.

Look at his record man

He's a constitutionialist, that's his record. I could see where that might be a problem for you

 

[TNHarley]

The ironic thing about kavfefe is he thinks govt ASSUMPTION is enough to restrict our rights.
What a fucking JOKE he is

.

Look at his record man

He's a constitutionialist, that's his record. I could see where that might be a problem for you

The patriot act is not constitutional
Where do you retards come up with this bullshit?
He supoorted the aca mandate as well. That wasnt constitutional either.
he aint no goddamn constitutionalist. he is a swamp critter and trump got you hacks wanting to suck his dick

 

[TNHarley]

Drain the swamp! Lmao

 

[candycorn]

Investigations in general are usually lacking.

Rob Porter had a wife who filed and EPO against him. He was staff secretary at the White House. While the FBI may not have done a check on it, surely the Secret Service should have and not allowed this serial wife abuser anywhere near the President much less the sensitive information he may have held. PS: Kav had the same job under Bush.


For a thorough investigation you need a set up like Captain Mueller has; a staff of competent individuals who know what questions to ask and the authority to drill as deep as you need to drill. And you need time.

Kav's investigation is for a job; he's had it done six times already. Whatever the investigation entails; nothing has been found before that is disqualifying.

are you saying the fbi sucks?

No. I’m saying for a thorough investigation, you need a set up like we have for the special counsel. Someone who has the time, staff, and authority.

where's the precedence for such an investigation for a nominee to the supreme court? that's how we run our government by precedence.

Where is the precedence for holding a spot open for nearly a year by the Committee?

are your referring to Garland? If you are, here it is from the '92. The Biden Rule:

In Context: The 'Biden Rule' on Supreme Court nominations in an election year

"McConnell is using Biden’s own words from 1992, when George H.W. Bush was president and Biden was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, to explain why he intends to block President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court pick in an election year.

"The Senate will continue to observe the Biden Rule so that the American people have a voice in this momentous decision" on who to name to the court, McConnell said in a March 16 speech on the floor of the Senate.

McConnell went on to quote some words from then-Judiciary Chairman Biden to show why the Senate’s disagreement with Obama is "about a principle, not a person.""

Dude, you all never know your facts. amazing shit.

And who was the name of the previous nominees that didn’t get a hearing?

 

[jc456]

are you saying the fbi sucks?

No. I’m saying for a thorough investigation, you need a set up like we have for the special counsel. Someone who has the time, staff, and authority.

where's the precedence for such an investigation for a nominee to the supreme court? that's how we run our government by precedence.

Where is the precedence for holding a spot open for nearly a year by the Committee?

are your referring to Garland? If you are, here it is from the '92. The Biden Rule:

In Context: The 'Biden Rule' on Supreme Court nominations in an election year

"McConnell is using Biden’s own words from 1992, when George H.W. Bush was president and Biden was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, to explain why he intends to block President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court pick in an election year.

"The Senate will continue to observe the Biden Rule so that the American people have a voice in this momentous decision" on who to name to the court, McConnell said in a March 16 speech on the floor of the Senate.

McConnell went on to quote some words from then-Judiciary Chairman Biden to show why the Senate’s disagreement with Obama is "about a principle, not a person.""

Dude, you all never know your facts. amazing shit.

And who was the name of the previous nominees that didn’t get a hearing?

 

[OKTexas]

The ironic thing about kavfefe is he thinks govt ASSUMPTION is enough to restrict our rights.
What a fucking JOKE he is

.

Look at his record man

So you are unable to provide an example with a substantiating link? You're as bad a witness as Ford. Ya got to fill in the details child.

.

It's not a secret. LOL

Brett Kavanaugh’s Fourth Amendment Blind Spot

Judge Kavanaugh on the Fourth Amendment - SCOTUSblog

but Trump and the gop want a Justice who is more for govt power than indiv rights. Look at the other three semifinalists.

OMG are you really telling me he upheld drug testing as a condition of employment? OMG OMG ROFLMFAO

.

 

[Meister]

The ironic thing about kavfefe is he thinks govt ASSUMPTION is enough to restrict our rights.
What a fucking JOKE he is

.

Look at his record man

He's a constitutionialist, that's his record. I could see where that might be a problem for you

The patriot act is not constitutional
Where do you retards come up with this bullshit?
He supoorted the aca mandate as well. That wasnt constitutional either.
he aint no goddamn constitutionalist. he is a swamp critter and trump got you hacks wanting to suck his dick

No one is going to get everything they want from any one judge.
You look at the preponderance of his rulings, and he's what I already described to you.
Now with the insults towards me....at least the sheep don't run scared from me on sight as they do to with you, fool.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Investigations in general are usually lacking.

Rob Porter had a wife who filed and EPO against him. He was staff secretary at the White House. While the FBI may not have done a check on it, surely the Secret Service should have and not allowed this serial wife abuser anywhere near the President much less the sensitive information he may have held. PS: Kav had the same job under Bush.


For a thorough investigation you need a set up like Captain Mueller has; a staff of competent individuals who know what questions to ask and the authority to drill as deep as you need to drill. And you need time.

Kav's investigation is for a job; he's had it done six times already. Whatever the investigation entails; nothing has been found before that is disqualifying.

are you saying the fbi sucks?

No. I’m saying for a thorough investigation, you need a set up like we have for the special counsel. Someone who has the time, staff, and authority.

where's the precedence for such an investigation for a nominee to the supreme court? that's how we run our government by precedence.

How many nominees for the SC have been accused of sexual abuse?

 

[OKTexas]

The ironic thing about kavfefe is he thinks govt ASSUMPTION is enough to restrict our rights.
What a fucking JOKE he is

.

Look at his record man

So you are unable to provide an example with a substantiating link? You're as bad a witness as Ford. Ya got to fill in the details child.

.

You think i am going to post his record? Lol
If you dont know, or care to, why even post about it?

No. LMAO

.

 

[P@triot]

Keep in mind that Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 and those who voted for the other candidates seem very motivated to repair the damage done by McConnell, Ryan and Trump&Co.

Just to be clear here...which "damage" would that be? The record high market numbers? Or the record low unemployment numbers? The record high median income maybe?

Leave it to marxist socialists to consider unprecedented prosperity to be "damage". In other words, damage to their desire to continue to mooch for more.