What Liberal News Sources Aren't Telling You About the IG Report

[bripat9643]

The FBI withheld information from the FISA court that they felt was damning to their case and may prevent them from getting the warrant. That is all you need to know about whether or not they had a motive. if they were truly just trying to get to the bottom of things, they would release all information, but they merely wanted to get Trump. They were acting as prosecutors against Trump vs investigators. It is obvious to anyone who doesn't have TDS.

You already assigned motive to the agents in your first sentence. The IG report stated they could not determine the motive, whether it was intentional or whether it was simply error. It's hard for me to believe it was simply error, but if any of these agents are going to be prosecuted for it, the DOJ needs to do better than "hard for me to believe" and reach a higher bar.

we have proven they falsified evidence
we have proven they set people up
we have proven they lied when they said the steele report wasn't used
we have proven their hate for trump
we have proven they had "insurance policies"

and you need more.

yet "can you look into that" is a high crime and trump needs to go.

**** that shit.

All I need is for people to not exaggerate or repeat falsehoods about what has been proven.

There were lies and omissions on the FISA warrant. No one was "set up" in fact the Horowitz report indicates there was no indication there was anything of the sort. I don't know where you got that they said the Steele report wasn't used. Some people showed they had bias against Trump. A lot of other people had no such evidence.

You all should apply the same standards for Trump as you do these FBI staff and see where that gets you.

When are you going to quit lying? The stuff you post is almost 100% lies.

 

[JoeB131]

So much bullshit, where to begin? The aid wasn’t held up. There was no “Russian interference” that helped Trump win. The fact you cling to that makes you a fool. Poor baby doesn’t know how elections work with the Electoral College. 30 states to 20. Supermajority. You lose. As always. Your constant crying will do you good come next year.

Guy, I know exactly how the racist, anachronistic EC works... It just still shouldn't be a thing.

17 Intel Agencies say the Russians interferred in our election with the intention to help Trump. The only question was did he know what was going on. Everyone assumed he was too stupid to.

Until he got caught trying to shake down the Ukraine like a cheap mob boss selling protection.

 

[SweetTea]

We aren't headed for a recession. MSM is telling you that because they hope that if they beat that drum it will come to pass which will at least give the Democrats a shot at winning in 2020. They don't care about America, they only care that their candidate gets elected. It's pretty sad really.
.

Manufacturing sector is already in recession. First time unemployment filings hit a two year high today.

Trump is probably beatable without a recession, but one is coming... it's just a matter of when. Hopefully before the election because the blame can be put where it belongs.

Yeah, a recession will come at some point, that is for sure. We have had a long bull run. One thing is for sure is that if a Democrat gets elected, the recession will be expididted and no doubt blamed on Trump. Being the brilliant economists the Democrats are, they will raise taxes on individuals and corporations because that will fix everything.

Democrats are pure lunatics and/or ignorant with regards to economics.

 

[SweetTea]

IG report shows that either the FBI was grossly inept, biased or both. The only explanation for saying otherwise is NOT reading the report.

They attempted to survell Carter Page in Aug. of 2016. They went to the FISA court and asked for their blessing, which they did NOT get, since they diidn't have any evidence. Then, McCabe desides to use the Steele dossier as a reason to get a FISA warrant. We all know the origins of this phony dossier. On top of all of that, they failed to report information from informants that suggested there was no reason for a warrant. They also altered emails to make their case look better to the court.

In the report, Horrowitz said there were "factual misstatements omissions" that when " “taken together resulted in [surveillance] applications that made it appear that the information supporting probable cause was stronger than was actually the case.”

Sorry, but this coupled with text messages from FBI officials showing CLEAR bias against Trump, tends to raise the eyebrow of any reasonable person.

No, it just shows that the professionals in government were rightfully concerned about Trump.

If they were really out to get him, they'd have dropped the Steele Dossier into the NYT, Washington Post, etc. A week before the election.

Instead, the FBI reopened the bullshit Hillary Email investigation... which probably doomed her campaign.

How do you figure that they were "rightfully concerned?" After a slew of investigations and tons of money they still have NOTHING. I know your handlers are telling you something different, but those are cold hard facts.

Funny you think Trump has done something but the Hillary email scam, which she CLEARLY did, doesn't mean anythiing. She deleted a bunch of emails to keep them from being found, but hey, that is cool and totally legal.(not) You guys are deranged.

 

[JoeB131]

Yeah, a recession will come at some point, that is for sure. We have had a long bull run. One thing is for sure is that if a Democrat gets elected, the recession will be expididted and no doubt blamed on Trump. Being the brilliant economists the Democrats are, they will raise taxes on individuals and corporations because that will fix everything.

Democrats are pure lunatics and/or ignorant with regards to economics.

You know what, Guy... you have to go back to 1980 to find a recession that started when a Democrat was in charge.

The 1982, 90, 01, and 08 recessions... that's all you guys.

 

[JoeB131]

How do you figure that they were "rightfully concerned?" After a slew of investigations and tons of money they still have NOTHING. I know your handlers are telling you something different, but those are cold hard facts.

Hard cold facts- 17 intelligence agencies said Russia tried to interfere in our election.

Funny you think Trump has done something but the Hillary email scam, which she CLEARLY did, doesn't mean anythiing. She deleted a bunch of emails to keep them from being found, but hey, that is cool and totally legal.(not) You guys are deranged.

Okay, um... most people delete old emails when they are done with them. In fact, it's a good practice to delete old emails.

If she hadn't deleted them, you'd have claimed she was retaining information she no longer needed.

 

[SweetTea]

So much bullshit, where to begin? The aid wasn’t held up. There was no “Russian interference” that helped Trump win. The fact you cling to that makes you a fool. Poor baby doesn’t know how elections work with the Electoral College. 30 states to 20. Supermajority. You lose. As always. Your constant crying will do you good come next year.

Guy, I know exactly how the racist, anachronistic EC works... It just still shouldn't be a thing.

17 Intel Agencies say the Russians interferred in our election with the intention to help Trump. The only question was did he know what was going on. Everyone assumed he was too stupid to.

Until he got caught trying to shake down the Ukraine like a cheap mob boss selling protection.

But he didn't get caught. He released the transcript which was a big nothing burger. The Democrats then started scrambling to find some other reason for their nonsense. They are now trying to use a process crime of obstruction. Great plan, that fools the intellectually challenged.

Imagine if the government decided they wanted to get JoeB131 on something...anything. They could charge you with robbing the Federal Reserve for example. You would then lawyer up, which they would them claim that was an admission of guilt and make sure they let their friends in the media to help them dissiminate this admission of guilt to get publlic senttiment on their side. They would then subpoena every bit of personal information they could possibly think of hoping to find something. When they find nothing, they then ask you to do something that violates your civil rights. You refuse and they then move away from the charge of robbing the bank, which was bogus to begin with, and charge you with obstruction. This is the Dumbocrats modus operandi and you lemmings fall for it every time.

 

[SweetTea]

Yeah, a recession will come at some point, that is for sure. We have had a long bull run. One thing is for sure is that if a Democrat gets elected, the recession will be expididted and no doubt blamed on Trump. Being the brilliant economists the Democrats are, they will raise taxes on individuals and corporations because that will fix everything.

Democrats are pure lunatics and/or ignorant with regards to economics.

You know what, Guy... you have to go back to 1980 to find a recession that started when a Democrat was in charge.

The 1982, 90, 01, and 08 recessions... that's all you guys.

Sure, which is exactly why Republicans are the party of the rich, right? You are a special kind of stupid.

 

[iceberg]

The FBI withheld information from the FISA court that they felt was damning to their case and may prevent them from getting the warrant. That is all you need to know about whether or not they had a motive. if they were truly just trying to get to the bottom of things, they would release all information, but they merely wanted to get Trump. They were acting as prosecutors against Trump vs investigators. It is obvious to anyone who doesn't have TDS.

You already assigned motive to the agents in your first sentence. The IG report stated they could not determine the motive, whether it was intentional or whether it was simply error. It's hard for me to believe it was simply error, but if any of these agents are going to be prosecuted for it, the DOJ needs to do better than "hard for me to believe" and reach a higher bar.

we have proven they falsified evidence
we have proven they set people up
we have proven they lied when they said the steele report wasn't used
we have proven their hate for trump
we have proven they had "insurance policies"

and you need more.

yet "can you look into that" is a high crime and trump needs to go.

**** that shit.

All I need is for people to not exaggerate or repeat falsehoods about what has been proven.

There were lies and omissions on the FISA warrant. No one was "set up" in fact the Horowitz report indicates there was no indication there was anything of the sort. I don't know where you got that they said the Steele report wasn't used. Some people showed they had bias against Trump. A lot of other people had no such evidence.

You all should apply the same standards for Trump as you do these FBI staff and see where that gets you.

When are you going to quit lying? The stuff you post is almost 100% lies.

so...business as usual.

 

[JoeB131]

But he didn't get caught. He released the transcript which was a big nothing burger. The Democrats then started scrambling to find some other reason for their nonsense. They are now trying to use a process crime of obstruction. Great plan, that fools the intellectually challenged.

Numerous witnesses have said the transcript isn't accurate... but never mind.

Okay, they also charged him with abuse of power by shaking down the Ukraine to start with. Obstruction is what they also charged Clinton and Nixon with when they were impeached.

Imagine if the government decided they wanted to get JoeB131 on something...anything. They could charge you with robbing the Federal Reserve for example. You would then lawyer up, which they would them claim that was an admission of guilt and make sure they let their friends in the media to help them dissiminate this admission of guilt to get publlic senttiment on their side. They would then subpoena every bit of personal information they could possibly think of hoping to find something. When they find nothing, they then ask you to do something that violates your civil rights. You refuse and they then move away from the charge of robbing the bank, which was bogus to begin with, and charge you with obstruction. This is the Dumbocrats modus operandi and you lemmings fall for it every time.

Except you can't really cite any other case where the Democrats did anything like this... In fact, Bush and Reagan had similar scandals, but they completely cooperated and were exonerated. Reagan told everyone to cooperate with Congress and Lawrence Walsh with Iran Contra, and at the end of the day, he wasn't impeached. Bush told everyone to cooperate with the Plame investigation, and he wasn't impeached either.

If Trump were truly "innocent", he would direct Mulvany, Guliani, Bolton, Pompeo and everyone else involved to testify as to what happened. Instead, he's hiding behind executive privilege.... that's what GUILTY people do.

 

[iceberg]

How do you figure that they were "rightfully concerned?" After a slew of investigations and tons of money they still have NOTHING. I know your handlers are telling you something different, but those are cold hard facts.

Hard cold facts- 17 intelligence agencies said Russia tried to interfere in our election.

Funny you think Trump has done something but the Hillary email scam, which she CLEARLY did, doesn't mean anythiing. She deleted a bunch of emails to keep them from being found, but hey, that is cool and totally legal.(not) You guys are deranged.

Okay, um... most people delete old emails when they are done with them. In fact, it's a good practice to delete old emails.

If she hadn't deleted them, you'd have claimed she was retaining information she no longer needed.

this bullshit again.

FOUR SAID IT - the rest had nothing to do with it but just went with "echo chamber" talk.

for hillarys mails - if trump did this very same thing you would NOT be defending the practice. besides, as soon as she used it for gov business she must comply with gov laws WHICH INCLUDE email retention policies.

also:
https://sharylattkisson.com/2016/11...mmary-of-fbi-report-on-hillary-clinton-email/

Feb. 1, 2013: Hillary’s last day as secretary of state. She fails to produce her federal records as required by law.

Summer of 2014: State Dept. notifies Hillary aide Cheryl Mills that it will be requesting Hillary’s work emails.

March 3, 2015: House Benghazi committee requests Hillary attorneys at Williams & Connolly to preserve and produce all documents and media related to her two clintonemail.com known addresses. (NOTE - ALL DOCUMENTS AND MEDIA)

Oct. 28, 2015: State Dept. sends formal request to Hillary and other former secretaries asking for their work-related emails. Hillary directs attorneys Kendall and Mills to oversee.

and:
Bombshell: In Newly-Released Email, Hillary Orders Aide to Strip Classified Marking

if you're just cleaning up old mail, why try to strip header information? please tell me a good burger king whopper as to how this is ok.

god damn you do just make this up as needed.

 

[JoeB131]

Sure, which is exactly why Republicans are the party of the rich, right? You are a special kind of stupid.

I think you miss the point. Recessions are a key part of Plutocracy. Of course, the Rich WANT a recession, so they can slash worker's pay and benefits, just like they do after EVERY recession.

They are just trying their level best to put it off until after the Election, because they know that people will throw Trump out so hard he'll bounce if it starts before the election.

They can put it off much longer.

 

[JoeB131]

this bullshit again.

FOUR SAID IT - the rest had nothing to do with it but just went with "echo chamber" talk.

Four said it, the other 13 concurred. I'm not sure why you think this is a winning talking point. The Russians meddled.

If anything, I suspect that the Intel Agencies are downplaying how much the Russians meddled, because they don't want to look like they messed up.

for hillarys mails - if trump did this very same thing you would NOT be defending the practice. besides, as soon as she used it for gov business she must comply with gov laws WHICH INCLUDE email retention policies.

Jared is using "Whatsapp" to do government business. I don't give a **** about that, either.

Point was, when you guys started asking for emails, she had already been gone for a couple of years... why would she still have that stuff?

if you're just cleaning up old mail, why try to strip header information? please tell me a good burger king whopper as to how this is ok.

god damn you do just make this up as needed.

Because the information wasn't that critical... it was actually a PRESS RELEASE she was supposed to announce on television that day.

 

[colfax_m]

The FBI withheld information from the FISA court that they felt was damning to their case and may prevent them from getting the warrant. That is all you need to know about whether or not they had a motive. if they were truly just trying to get to the bottom of things, they would release all information, but they merely wanted to get Trump. They were acting as prosecutors against Trump vs investigators. It is obvious to anyone who doesn't have TDS.

You already assigned motive to the agents in your first sentence. The IG report stated they could not determine the motive, whether it was intentional or whether it was simply error. It's hard for me to believe it was simply error, but if any of these agents are going to be prosecuted for it, the DOJ needs to do better than "hard for me to believe" and reach a higher bar.

we have proven they falsified evidence
we have proven they set people up
we have proven they lied when they said the steele report wasn't used
we have proven their hate for trump
we have proven they had "insurance policies"

and you need more.

yet "can you look into that" is a high crime and trump needs to go.

**** that shit.

All I need is for people to not exaggerate or repeat falsehoods about what has been proven.

There were lies and omissions on the FISA warrant. No one was "set up" in fact the Horowitz report indicates there was no indication there was anything of the sort. I don't know where you got that they said the Steele report wasn't used. Some people showed they had bias against Trump. A lot of other people had no such evidence.

You all should apply the same standards for Trump as you do these FBI staff and see where that gets you.

When are you going to quit lying? The stuff you post is almost 100% lies.

so...business as usual.

Do you have so little courage in your convictions that you won’t allow them to be challenged?

 

[colfax_m]

How do you figure that they were "rightfully concerned?" After a slew of investigations and tons of money they still have NOTHING. I know your handlers are telling you something different, but those are cold hard facts.

Hard cold facts- 17 intelligence agencies said Russia tried to interfere in our election.

Funny you think Trump has done something but the Hillary email scam, which she CLEARLY did, doesn't mean anythiing. She deleted a bunch of emails to keep them from being found, but hey, that is cool and totally legal.(not) You guys are deranged.

Okay, um... most people delete old emails when they are done with them. In fact, it's a good practice to delete old emails.

If she hadn't deleted them, you'd have claimed she was retaining information she no longer needed.

this bullshit again.

FOUR SAID IT - the rest had nothing to do with it but just went with "echo chamber" talk.

for hillarys mails - if trump did this very same thing you would NOT be defending the practice. besides, as soon as she used it for gov business she must comply with gov laws WHICH INCLUDE email retention policies.

also:
https://sharylattkisson.com/2016/11...mmary-of-fbi-report-on-hillary-clinton-email/

Feb. 1, 2013: Hillary’s last day as secretary of state. She fails to produce her federal records as required by law.

Summer of 2014: State Dept. notifies Hillary aide Cheryl Mills that it will be requesting Hillary’s work emails.

March 3, 2015: House Benghazi committee requests Hillary attorneys at Williams & Connolly to preserve and produce all documents and media related to her two clintonemail.com known addresses. (NOTE - ALL DOCUMENTS AND MEDIA)

Oct. 28, 2015: State Dept. sends formal request to Hillary and other former secretaries asking for their work-related emails. Hillary directs attorneys Kendall and Mills to oversee.

and:
Bombshell: In Newly-Released Email, Hillary Orders Aide to Strip Classified Marking

if you're just cleaning up old mail, why try to strip header information? please tell me a good burger king whopper as to how this is ok.

god damn you do just make this up as needed.

Numerous people in the Trump administration, including his children, have been using non-government emails and messaging apps to conduct official business with no oversight.

 

[SweetTea]

How do you figure that they were "rightfully concerned?" After a slew of investigations and tons of money they still have NOTHING. I know your handlers are telling you something different, but those are cold hard facts.

Hard cold facts- 17 intelligence agencies said Russia tried to interfere in our election.

Funny you think Trump has done something but the Hillary email scam, which she CLEARLY did, doesn't mean anythiing. She deleted a bunch of emails to keep them from being found, but hey, that is cool and totally legal.(not) You guys are deranged.

Okay, um... most people delete old emails when they are done with them. In fact, it's a good practice to delete old emails.

If she hadn't deleted them, you'd have claimed she was retaining information she no longer needed.

Yeah, Russians tried to interfere. Why wasn't the FBI concerned with checking into Hillary and the DNC?

Hillary deleted and perminently wiped emails AFTER the server was subpoened by the court. Na, she wasn't trying to cover anything up. I swear you guys will believe anything.

 

[SweetTea]

But he didn't get caught. He released the transcript which was a big nothing burger. The Democrats then started scrambling to find some other reason for their nonsense. They are now trying to use a process crime of obstruction. Great plan, that fools the intellectually challenged.

Numerous witnesses have said the transcript isn't accurate... but never mind.

Okay, they also charged him with abuse of power by shaking down the Ukraine to start with. Obstruction is what they also charged Clinton and Nixon with when they were impeached.

Imagine if the government decided they wanted to get JoeB131 on something...anything. They could charge you with robbing the Federal Reserve for example. You would then lawyer up, which they would them claim that was an admission of guilt and make sure they let their friends in the media to help them dissiminate this admission of guilt to get publlic senttiment on their side. They would then subpoena every bit of personal information they could possibly think of hoping to find something. When they find nothing, they then ask you to do something that violates your civil rights. You refuse and they then move away from the charge of robbing the bank, which was bogus to begin with, and charge you with obstruction. This is the Dumbocrats modus operandi and you lemmings fall for it every time.

Except you can't really cite any other case where the Democrats did anything like this... In fact, Bush and Reagan had similar scandals, but they completely cooperated and were exonerated. Reagan told everyone to cooperate with Congress and Lawrence Walsh with Iran Contra, and at the end of the day, he wasn't impeached. Bush told everyone to cooperate with the Plame investigation, and he wasn't impeached either.

If Trump were truly "innocent", he would direct Mulvany, Guliani, Bolton, Pompeo and everyone else involved to testify as to what happened. Instead, he's hiding behind executive privilege.... that's what GUILTY people do.

This entire farce will go down in history as a major abuse of power by Adam Schiff, who hopefully will be held accountable for lying and setting up this entire scam with the "whistleblower." Only you dense Democrats believe otherwise.

 

[SweetTea]

How do you figure that they were "rightfully concerned?" After a slew of investigations and tons of money they still have NOTHING. I know your handlers are telling you something different, but those are cold hard facts.

Hard cold facts- 17 intelligence agencies said Russia tried to interfere in our election.

Funny you think Trump has done something but the Hillary email scam, which she CLEARLY did, doesn't mean anythiing. She deleted a bunch of emails to keep them from being found, but hey, that is cool and totally legal.(not) You guys are deranged.

Okay, um... most people delete old emails when they are done with them. In fact, it's a good practice to delete old emails.

If she hadn't deleted them, you'd have claimed she was retaining information she no longer needed.

this bullshit again.

FOUR SAID IT - the rest had nothing to do with it but just went with "echo chamber" talk.

for hillarys mails - if trump did this very same thing you would NOT be defending the practice. besides, as soon as she used it for gov business she must comply with gov laws WHICH INCLUDE email retention policies.

also:
https://sharylattkisson.com/2016/11...mmary-of-fbi-report-on-hillary-clinton-email/

Feb. 1, 2013: Hillary’s last day as secretary of state. She fails to produce her federal records as required by law.

Summer of 2014: State Dept. notifies Hillary aide Cheryl Mills that it will be requesting Hillary’s work emails.

March 3, 2015: House Benghazi committee requests Hillary attorneys at Williams & Connolly to preserve and produce all documents and media related to her two clintonemail.com known addresses. (NOTE - ALL DOCUMENTS AND MEDIA)

Oct. 28, 2015: State Dept. sends formal request to Hillary and other former secretaries asking for their work-related emails. Hillary directs attorneys Kendall and Mills to oversee.

and:
Bombshell: In Newly-Released Email, Hillary Orders Aide to Strip Classified Marking

if you're just cleaning up old mail, why try to strip header information? please tell me a good burger king whopper as to how this is ok.

god damn you do just make this up as needed.

Numerous people in the Trump administration, including his children, have been using non-government emails and messaging apps to conduct official business with no oversight.

So its it ok or is it not ok? If it is NOT ok then Hillary should be convicted along with the folks you are accusing in the Trump administration. If you don't think Hillary should have been held accountable, then I guess you don
t have a beef now either.

 

[iceberg]

How do you figure that they were "rightfully concerned?" After a slew of investigations and tons of money they still have NOTHING. I know your handlers are telling you something different, but those are cold hard facts.

Hard cold facts- 17 intelligence agencies said Russia tried to interfere in our election.

Funny you think Trump has done something but the Hillary email scam, which she CLEARLY did, doesn't mean anythiing. She deleted a bunch of emails to keep them from being found, but hey, that is cool and totally legal.(not) You guys are deranged.

Okay, um... most people delete old emails when they are done with them. In fact, it's a good practice to delete old emails.

If she hadn't deleted them, you'd have claimed she was retaining information she no longer needed.

this bullshit again.

FOUR SAID IT - the rest had nothing to do with it but just went with "echo chamber" talk.

for hillarys mails - if trump did this very same thing you would NOT be defending the practice. besides, as soon as she used it for gov business she must comply with gov laws WHICH INCLUDE email retention policies.

also:
https://sharylattkisson.com/2016/11...mmary-of-fbi-report-on-hillary-clinton-email/

Feb. 1, 2013: Hillary’s last day as secretary of state. She fails to produce her federal records as required by law.

Summer of 2014: State Dept. notifies Hillary aide Cheryl Mills that it will be requesting Hillary’s work emails.

March 3, 2015: House Benghazi committee requests Hillary attorneys at Williams & Connolly to preserve and produce all documents and media related to her two clintonemail.com known addresses. (NOTE - ALL DOCUMENTS AND MEDIA)

Oct. 28, 2015: State Dept. sends formal request to Hillary and other former secretaries asking for their work-related emails. Hillary directs attorneys Kendall and Mills to oversee.

and:
Bombshell: In Newly-Released Email, Hillary Orders Aide to Strip Classified Marking

if you're just cleaning up old mail, why try to strip header information? please tell me a good burger king whopper as to how this is ok.

god damn you do just make this up as needed.

Numerous people in the Trump administration, including his children, have been using non-government emails and messaging apps to conduct official business with no oversight.

i am not going to play this @gmail.com vs. my own private server game crap. been in IT for 30+ years and know the differences. go do the "i'm a dumbass" dance elsewhere.

 

[iceberg]

You already assigned motive to the agents in your first sentence. The IG report stated they could not determine the motive, whether it was intentional or whether it was simply error. It's hard for me to believe it was simply error, but if any of these agents are going to be prosecuted for it, the DOJ needs to do better than "hard for me to believe" and reach a higher bar.

we have proven they falsified evidence
we have proven they set people up
we have proven they lied when they said the steele report wasn't used
we have proven their hate for trump
we have proven they had "insurance policies"

and you need more.

yet "can you look into that" is a high crime and trump needs to go.

**** that shit.

All I need is for people to not exaggerate or repeat falsehoods about what has been proven.

There were lies and omissions on the FISA warrant. No one was "set up" in fact the Horowitz report indicates there was no indication there was anything of the sort. I don't know where you got that they said the Steele report wasn't used. Some people showed they had bias against Trump. A lot of other people had no such evidence.

You all should apply the same standards for Trump as you do these FBI staff and see where that gets you.

When are you going to quit lying? The stuff you post is almost 100% lies.

so...business as usual.

Do you have so little courage in your convictions that you won’t allow them to be challenged?

challenge away. but stop being stupid and trying to sell me your idiocy.