The last time minimum wage was raised was in 2009, 13 years ago. It hasn’t kept up with the cost of living by any means. Walmart wage rates, for example, run from $10/hour for cashier/sticker to $18.49/contact center engineer in WV. A Walmart optician earns 14.95/hr in Front Royal, VA. Average Walmart sales associate earns 13.30 an hour. Walmart is a good example of retail entry level jobs. $17 or $18 is probably in an area with a very high cost of living.
So because an able-bodied adult doesn’t want to take a job paying $15 an hour means WE should have to provide him with financial support? Why is he entitled to sit home and watch TV all day while others subsidize his rent and feed his kids?
ThT is an excellent example of what is really the problem here in my opinion: lack of affordable child care or in some cases, any child care. Child support is only as good as the salary of the other parent by the way. Childcare is so expensive that welfare benefits offer a better choice for single parents when you factor in the costs of working: childcare, a vehicle or transportation etc.
We need some genuine pro-family policies.
The example I have is when BOTH parents refuse to work Because they feel a job at Target or Walmart is “beneath” them. One parent stays home with the kids, and the other gets a job. Why should we have to help support their family when NEITHER parent is working?
Everyone has a story, some people are freeloaders but some have hidden disabilities.
Yes, and for those who have disabilities, there is SSI. But they need to prove it.
For every family like that, there is a family where there are genuine reasons for need: one parent is at home caring for children the other working one or mor low wage jobs.
OK….so because other families are doing it right - one parent is working and the other caring for children - how does that excuse the freeloaders?
This is what you’ve said, in effect:
Me: A family where neither parent is working, when there are jobs going begging at $15 or more an hour, because both parents feel that work is beneath them, should NOT be getting money from taxpayers to feed and house their children.
You: Not every family is like that. Some families have one parent working and one caring for the kids.
So how does THAT answer what we should do about the entitled parents, who BOTH feel that a job at Walmart is beneath them, but have no problems taking OPM to support their kids?