Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think Muslims have an inherent right to be here. Same as any other furriners.Emphasis on what he proposes...not what a bunch of shriek ears say he proposes.
Trump's ban on Muslim entry to the U.S. would be unconstitutional, experts say: Donald Trump in the news
To me he proposes a temporary ban against a potential threat, until the government creates a foolproof solution. What's unconstitutional about that?
To me he proposes a temporary ban against a potential threat, until the government creates a foolproof solution. What's unconstitutional about that?
This reminds me of those threads that go "What do you consider rich?" where every answer is wrong. If you think banning a religion is constitutional then you just saved me a bunch of time.
Exactly.To me he proposes a temporary ban against a potential threat, until the government creates a foolproof solution. What's unconstitutional about that?
This reminds me of those threads that go "What do you consider rich?" where every answer is wrong. If you think banning a religion is constitutional then you just saved me a bunch of time.
who is "banning a religion"?
To me he proposes a temporary ban against a potential threat, until the government creates a foolproof solution. What's unconstitutional about that?
This reminds me of those threads that go "What do you consider rich?" where every answer is wrong. If you think banning a religion is constitutional then you just saved me a bunch of time.
who is "banning a religion"?
To me he proposes a temporary ban against a potential threat, until the government creates a foolproof solution. What's unconstitutional about that?
The government cannot discriminate based on religion. It's in the first amendment.
I don't think that...but I do think you're a moron.To me he proposes a temporary ban against a potential threat, until the government creates a foolproof solution. What's unconstitutional about that?
This reminds me of those threads that go "What do you consider rich?" where every answer is wrong. If you think banning a religion is constitutional then you just saved me a bunch of time.
To me he proposes a temporary ban against a potential threat, until the government creates a foolproof solution. What's unconstitutional about that?
This reminds me of those threads that go "What do you consider rich?" where every answer is wrong. If you think banning a religion is constitutional then you just saved me a bunch of time.
who is "banning a religion"?
Ok, banning the people from practicing their religion unless closing Mosques means opening Mosques
So if someone wants to kill you. You can't target them?The government cannot discriminate based on religion. It's in the first amendment.
They'll do that pretzel logic thing where they'll say targeting certain people isnt discrimination. Followed by questions like "Whats discriminatory about it?".
I don't think that...but I do think you're a moron.To me he proposes a temporary ban against a potential threat, until the government creates a foolproof solution. What's unconstitutional about that?
This reminds me of those threads that go "What do you consider rich?" where every answer is wrong. If you think banning a religion is constitutional then you just saved me a bunch of time.
Not when referring to immigration. Hell, those people aren't even CITIZENS.The government cannot discriminate based on religion. It's in the first amendment.
To me he proposes a temporary ban against a potential threat, until the government creates a foolproof solution. What's unconstitutional about that?
This reminds me of those threads that go "What do you consider rich?" where every answer is wrong. If you think banning a religion is constitutional then you just saved me a bunch of time.
who is "banning a religion"?
Ok, banning the people from practicing their religion unless closing Mosques means opening Mosques
closing mosques which have been implicated in the support of terrorism is----
ENTIRELY LEGAL ------- in fact the property can be confiscated
Anti-American to consider AMERICAN interests? REALLY?I'll leave the question of constitutionality to the lawyers, but there's no question Trump's plan, and all of you clowns that support it, are reprehensible and anti-American.
