Katie Britt proposes federal database to collect data on pregnant people

[Tommy Tainant]

Sounds like dogma ... I'm perfectly fine if Catholic Services wants to offer all the medical and financial help to pregnant women without mentioning abortion ... ten blocks down Main Street is Planned Parenthood where an expecting mother and father can get all the same help PLUS abortion services ...

You know this ... we all do ... you just like telling others what to believe ... you know ... dogma ... spay and neuter, it's the right thing to do ...

Good luck with your pregnancy.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Join the modern world, where women have penises.

BIGOT!

And child murder is fun! We have parties and shirts for you!

 

[Kondor3]

Its probably so they can track women who have abortions.

So you are speculating.

As I suspected.

Sorry.

No Sale.

Its a pro life organisation.

That is not a bad thing.

So long as they act within The Law and so long as they uphold proper ethical standards within their belief framework...

They have every right to serve-up Information and Resources as Alternatives to Abortion...

Every right.

Here in America we have a time-tested maxim...

"I may disagree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

This is much ado about nothing.

Wake me up if they ever actually begin collecting data on pregnant women without their assent.

 

[Nostra]

I expect tht they give better advice than the loonys on the other side. Katies mates.

That’s because you are a Limey, out of touch Moron.

HTH.

 

[rampart]

So you don't want these services made available? ... we have all that here ... this is up-and-running in Texas, Idaho, Alabama ... is the only difference abortion-related services? ...

Why do you think it's unhinged to protect the weakest in our communities? ...

federalism, reiny, and the constitution. but

would you, would any woman or person likely to access this information, trust the information from a federal site????? these are the guys who said the deadly jab was safe?

 

[Nostra]

Its probably so they can track women who have abortions. Its a pro life organisation.

Pro life organization > Pro death organization.

 

[Lesh]

Katie Britt proposes federal database to collect data on pregnant people

Republican US senator from Alabama best known for delivering widely ridiculed State of the Union speech in March

www.theguardian.com

The More Opportunities for Moms to Succeed (Moms) act proposes to establish an online government database called “pregnancy.gov” listing resources related to pregnancy, including information about adoption agencies and pregnancy care providers, except for those that provide abortion-related services.

At first I thught it was a good idea to help mothers. And then I read the detail and realised thatit was just more oppression of women by this crazy woman trying to rebuild its career.

The good news is it has little chance of becoming law. And it further reminds everyone of how unhinged theese people are.

An organisation cannot give people bad advice. Some people may be better served by having an abortion. Giving other advice based on political nonsense is something we call evil.

This is just pro life trash in the govt guise.

1984 meets The Handmaid’s Tale

 

[Anathema]

An organisation cannot give people bad advice. Some people may be better served by having an abortion. Giving other advice based on political nonsense is something we call evil.

This is just pro life trash in the govt guise.

It’s not pro-life, it’s anti-abortion. There’s a difference in the two philosophical concepts.

There are VERY few women for whom abortion is an acceptable option (rape victims and those in immediate danger of death). They all deserve to know all of their options.

 

[Kondor3]

Katie Britt proposes federal database to collect data on pregnant people

Oh, and, by the way...

The term is "pregnant WOMEN" and not "pregnant PEOPLE"...

There are only two genders... Male and Female...

Now... while women are people... not all people are women... about half the world's population, give-or-take...

And only females are capable of getting pregnant...

So the term "people" should not be used in connection with pregnancy status...

Doing so diminishes Women...

Women have it rough enough as it is... they don't need fruitcake "pretend" women intruding on their hallowed space.

 

[rampart]

So you are against government funds for Planned Unparenthood, right?

how deeply do planned parenthood delve into the plumbing of my wife and daughter? out of state travels and other personal details?

for a small government conservative to give PRESIDENT BIDEN this extraconstitutional power is , frankly, unexplainable.

 

[ReinyDays]

federalism, reiny, and the constitution. but

would you, would any woman or person likely to access this information, trust the information from a federal site????? these are the guys who said the deadly jab was safe?

The Canadian Constitution? ... because SCOTUS ruled each State decides the matter ... Go to the prenatal care websites from the Texas Government and see if this is what you want ... or go to California's and see if that serves your needs better ...

Trust the internet? ... no, and neither should you ... if you're pregnant, go see a doctor ...

Do you mean the "deadly jab" that won the most recent Nobel Prize in Medicine? ...

 

[Nostra]

how deeply do planned parenthood delve into the plumbing of my wife and daughter? out of state travels and other personal details?

for a small government conservative to give PRESIDENT BIDEN this extraconstitutional power is , frankly, unexplainable.

Pathetic dodge.

Try bringing an answer.