Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 80,459
- 59,385
- 3,565
YesWhy? Do you claim Trump would object?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
YesWhy? Do you claim Trump would object?
Zalupoonsky campaigned against Trump. What word did Trump have to keep?It was never a backwater issue.
Trump kissed Putin’s ass again and picked a fight with Zelinsky.
Trump never had any intention of ever keeping his word to Zelinsky or Ukraine.
Zelinsky knows that.
Trump tried to blackmail him twice, and failed both times.
Putin has no intention of honoring any agreement.
Zelinsky knows that too.
Lol, since he's been so forceful with Russia so far right?
Create another tax???So, continue with the plan that hasn't achieved its goal for years. Isn't Ukraine running out of troops?
You're wrong. The was Clinton's deal and he never guarantied Ukraine's security. Neither did Bush, Neither did Obama. Neither did Trump, Neither did Biden.No you aren't trying to be a smart ass. You are trying to pose a red herring, so you can avoid addressing almost my entire post. By trying to make me focus on a technicality instead of how Ukraine understood the terms of them giving up their nukes. So address my entire post and tell me how I'm wrong please.
Yes, the 72nd UN resolution saying Russia is a poopyhead. How has that worked to end the killing?Lol, since he's been so forceful with Russia so far right?
Last week he voted together with N-Korea against a resolution saying Russia was the aggressor.
Mac you are either stupid or dishonest. I don't think you're stupid.
Russia invaded Ukraine under Obama and Biden but not TrumpLol, since he's been so forceful with Russia so far right?
Yes, hindsight being that a US president would be more aligned to a Russian dictator then to Western Democracy.
I see you aren't ever going to address anything I said besides the one thing you think you can lawyer.
Second paragraph.
Half a trillion dollars and a few hundred thousand dead. How's that working for you?It has been and still is to drive Russia from Ukrainian territory and support democracy in the country.
The maga plan is to get fucked by pootin.
Putin wants access to the Crimean Peninsula that he already stole from Ukraine. Let him have it, I say.
Ukraine is NOT asking for troops. They are asking for money. Something much cheaper than blood.Do you want US troops in Ukraine fighting the Russians because of that agreement?
Ousting Russia from Afghanistan cost us 9/11. Do you really want to go there?Is Russia still in Afghanistan today? Or the US in Vietnam? I think not. You know why?
I'll tell you. Because keeping up their forces in the field caused internal turmoil to the point of severe civil upheaval in the US and some would argue outright collapse of the regime in the case of Russia. A Russia that was a SERIOUS superpower at the time.
Why is it that this can't happen now in your opinion?
The Left's plan?We hear a lot of saber-rattling about Putin from the Left. The Left appears to oppose Trump's attempt to broker a peace agreement in Ukraine.
So, what's the Left's plan to defeat Putin?![]()
Inflation in Russia is UP WAYYYYYYYY up. Kursk is still occupied. Russia hasn't broken through. And there has already been one tank column that marched on Moscow. Attrition takes time.So, the plan that is failing now.
Ousting Russia from Afghanistan was a major cause of ending the cold war. How many people died in that?Ousting Russia from Afghanistan cost us 9/11. Do you really want to go there?
Inchon??
Not the best analogy.
No it did not.Ousting Russia from Afghanistan cost us 9/11. Do you really want to go there?
Is Russia still in Afghanistan today? Or the US in Vietnam? I think not. You know why?
I'll tell you. Because keeping up their forces in the field caused internal turmoil to the point of severe civil upheaval in the US and some would argue outright collapse of the regime in the case of Russia. A Russia that was a SERIOUS superpower at the time.
Why is it that this can't happen now in your opinion?
The only reason the USMC exists is to be the Navy's Infantry. Hence, their name.
![]()
It depends on the scale of the war. If the Marines land in South Korea to support the US Army as they did on Okinawa, they will need tanks.