Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
By the government.For who? Why them?
Because of…the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Again if english were your first language you would know the sentence involved does not limit the right to belonging to a militia.But what makes anyone at all being part of a well regulated militia?
The founders already answered that question for you, stop trolling and educate yourself.Should it apply to 5 year olds? If your answer is either yes or no, what wording of the amendment specifies this?
A reasonable person would construe this to mean (a) adults and (b) the general population, armed to serve as a Militia of Last Resort for national defense.The rightwing will cite court precedent for this issue, but they don’t actually offer an explanation for why it should be interpreted this way.
Should this apply to 5 year olds? Should it be made legal for kids to buy firearms from a licensed firearm business because of how this is interpreted?
They’re just playing games. They know.Their utter stupidity over this easy-to-understand statement is astonishing!
More people are in a militia than you realizeThe militia movement is a fraction of what it was a few decades ago. I'm suggesting returning to a far more active movement.
The part that says he can't demand normal people be disarmed and unable to protect themselves from leftist tyranny.We don't have to sight precedent.....because you have to take the entire amendment into account.....not just parts of it that you think proves your case and exclude all others.
What part of the right "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?
Has there ever been a more powerful limit on government? I don't think so.Because of…the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
They’re just playing games. They know.
"The sun comes up in the east" could mean "the sun comes up in the west".“Shall not be infringed” could still apply to any interpretation of a well regulated militia.
Dem trolls gonna troll.The question is how many more times will the ghoul ask the same question.
COMMA ,,,,,,,,,AND THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS.The rightwing will cite court precedent for this issue, but they don’t actually offer an explanation for why it should be interpreted this way.
Should this apply to 5 year olds? Should it be made legal for kids to buy firearms from a licensed firearm business because of how this is interpreted?
It’s only confusing when reading it through the context of your understanding of it.The phrase can be confusing, it really doesn't need to be there.
The FF's didn't trust 'government'.For who? Why them?
We did embrace them ( Forming the Northern California State Militia In 2010 in Cottonwood Ca. ) and later with 1500 members and another 500+ Family members and associates as the California State MilitiaSo the whiny left is going to ignore Heller and pine about militias because they lost Roe? Perhaps rural America should embrace the militia movement. Oh how these urban centric liberal elites would howl then...
Well okay. Some are dupes and don’t know better. So, they’re easily propagandized.Are you sure since I see too many examples of leftist stupidity on basic information in various topics to believe it?
