Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"Well Regulated" refers to being armed and trained, not being regulated in what they can own or use.well regulated
Come get us doosh. Lol don't you all see all this scumbag is doing is just wasting people's time?The rightwing will cite court precedent for this issue, but they don’t actually offer an explanation for why it should be interpreted this way.
Should this apply to 5 year olds? Should it be made legal for kids to buy firearms from a licensed firearm business because of how this is interpreted?
Lol you’re right it doesn’t. That’s why it was pointless for you to define it as able bodied malesMoron... "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" Note the words.. THE PEOEPLE. gender was not assigned.
We don't have to sight precedent.....because you have to take the entire amendment into account.....not just parts of it that you think proves your case and exclude all others.The rightwing will cite court precedent for this issue, but they don’t actually offer an explanation for why it should be interpreted this way.
Should this apply to 5 year olds? Should it be made legal for kids to buy firearms from a licensed firearm business because of how this is interpreted?
holy crap"Well regulated militia" was probably put in there accidently.
Moron.. we were talking about the term MILITA...Lol you’re right it doesn’t. That’s why it was pointless for you to define it as able bodied males
Militia members were required to equip themselves with a musket, bayonet and belt, two spare flints, a box able to contain not less than 24 suitable cartridges, and a knapsack. Alternatively, everyone enrolled was to provide himself with a rifle, a powder horn, ¼ pound of gunpowder, 20 rifle balls, a shot-pouch, and a knapsack.[10] Exemptions applied to some occupations, including congressmen, stagecoach drivers and ferryboatmen.... each and every free able-bodied white male citizen of the respective States, resident therein, who is or shall be of age of eighteen years, and under the age of forty-five years (except as is herein after excepted) shall severally and respectively be enrolled in the militia, by the Captain or Commanding Officer of the company, within whose bounds such citizen shall reside ...
“Shall not be infringed” could still apply to any interpretation of a well regulated militia.We don't have to sight precedent.....because you have to take the entire amendment into account.....not just parts of it that you think proves your case and exclude all others.
What part of the right "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?
If that is exactly what well regulated militia means, wouldn’t we be defining it as who has the right to own them?Moron.. we were talking about the term MILITA...
Second Militia Act of 1792[edit]
Front page of a newspaper announcing the second Militia Act of 1792.
The second Militia Act of 1792 was passed on May 8, 1792, and provided for the organization of state militias and the conscription of every "free able-bodied white male citizen" between the ages of 18 and 45:
Militia members were required to equip themselves with a musket, bayonet and belt, two spare flints, a box able to contain not less than 24 suitable cartridges, and a knapsack. Alternatively, everyone enrolled was to provide himself with a rifle, a powder horn, ¼ pound of gunpowder, 20 rifle balls, a shot-pouch, and a knapsack.[10] Exemptions applied to some occupations, including congressmen, stagecoach drivers and ferryboatmen.
The militias were divided into "divisions, brigades, regiments, battalions, and companies" as the state legislatures would direct.[11] The provisions of the first Act governing the calling up of the militia by the president in case of invasion or obstruction to law enforcement were continued in the second act.[12] Court martial proceedings were authorized by the statute against militia members who disobeyed orders.[13]
Source
............................................
Prior to the militia acts it was "every free and able-bodied man"
no it couldnt,,“Shall not be infringed” could still apply to any interpretation of a well regulated militia.
Your talking yourself in circles... Understand the terms before you use them in a sentence.“Shall not be infringed” could still apply to any interpretation of a well regulated militia.
no,, its states who can keep and bear arms,,If that is exactly what well regulated militia means, wouldn’t we be defining it as who has the right to own them?
i have no idea what you are trying to askThe rightwing will cite court precedent for this issue, but they don’t actually offer an explanation for why it should be interpreted this way.
Should this apply to 5 year olds? Should it be made legal for kids to buy firearms from a licensed firearm business because of how this is interpreted?
You fools should figure out what a woman is before you tackle this concept... you wouldn't understand anyway.The rightwing will cite court precedent for this issue, but they don’t actually offer an explanation for why it should be interpreted this way.
Should this apply to 5 year olds? Should it be made legal for kids to buy firearms from a licensed firearm business because of how this is interpreted?
Okay, my interpretation is an individual citizen.“Shall not be infringed” could still apply to any interpretation of a well regulated militia.
Stop trying to reinvent the wheel. Founding documents and numerous communications between the founders told us who the militia is.The rightwing will cite court precedent for this issue, but they don’t actually offer an explanation for why it should be interpreted this way.
Should this apply to 5 year olds? Should it be made legal for kids to buy firearms from a licensed firearm business because of how this is interpreted?
FYI the government does not have a second amendment right.“Shall not be infringed” could still apply to any interpretation of a well regulated militia.
We do embrace the militia movement.So the whiny left is going to ignore Heller and pine about militias because they lost Roe? Perhaps rural America should embrace the militia movement. Oh how these urban centric liberal elites would howl then...
