Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
. . .please lets not speculate, the facts of the case are VERY clear...
exactly,since that has now been established that it was a false flag operation,wish there was something that could be done to arrest the real terrorists who pulled this off such as the neocons in the bush administration,clinton,,NIST officials,offcials in the CIA,and some way of arresting isreal government officials as well along with obama for participating in the coverup.
BullShit it's all about what you think! also if the language used is beyond your level of comprehension then any assumption you make would be wrong.What I think is irrelevant. What I will say is that for that particular beam (thanks FEMA!) it defies conventional wisdom. There is no logical, or scientific explanation. Plus, when you look at what happened to the building ultimately...well. It aint anything we have information about.
fucking typical! no evidence to support that claim
fucking typical! no evidence to support that claim
Evidence as follows, the alleged use of commercial airliners as weapons given the crash sites as photographed and presented to the public as the alleged result of said attack being violations of the laws of physics if the official explanation is to be taken at face value. + the fact that there is NO accounting for the aircraft wreckage ( as has been done in the case of EVERY airliner crash since the founding of the NTSB ) The "black boxes" that is flight data recorders & cockpit voice recorders from "FLT11" & "FLT175" are totally absent, not even a fragment of a recorder to be found in any of the wreckage examined in the months post 9/11/2001.
The extreme selling job that has been done to convince people that its an entirely plausible event, that is "FLT77" crashing into the PENTAGON and 99.9% of said aircraft ending up inside the building.
Not to mention the fact that the BIG LIE has permeated the whole country to such an extent that we have "peer reviewed" papers by college professors, such that a High-school student could debunk the material in said papers, but it all goes out lending an appearance of authority to an otherwise totally unsupportable claim. for a multitude of reasons, the whole "hijacked airliners used as weapons" story is a non-starter!
in addition there are factions that argue "FLT175" must have been flown at 590 mph to strike the South Tower. You have GOT 2 B Kidding! >500 mph & <1,000 ft altitude, in a commercial airliner..... ya, right?!?!?!
The entire fairy tale about the 19 hijackers is a FARCE!
fucking typical! no evidence to support that claim
Evidence as follows, the alleged use of commercial airliners as weapons given the crash sites as photographed and presented to the public as the alleged result of said attack being violations of the laws of physics if the official explanation is to be taken at face value. + the fact that there is NO accounting for the aircraft wreckage ( as has been done in the case of EVERY airliner crash since the founding of the NTSB ) The "black boxes" that is flight data recorders & cockpit voice recorders from "FLT11" & "FLT175" are totally absent, not even a fragment of a recorder to be found in any of the wreckage examined in the months post 9/11/2001.
The extreme selling job that has been done to convince people that its an entirely plausible event, that is "FLT77" crashing into the PENTAGON and 99.9% of said aircraft ending up inside the building.
Not to mention the fact that the BIG LIE has permeated the whole country to such an extent that we have "peer reviewed" papers by college professors, such that a High-school student could debunk the material in said papers, but it all goes out lending an appearance of authority to an otherwise totally unsupportable claim. for a multitude of reasons, the whole "hijacked airliners used as weapons" story is a non-starter!
in addition there are factions that argue "FLT175" must have been flown at 590 mph to strike the South Tower. You have GOT 2 B Kidding! >500 mph & <1,000 ft altitude, in a commercial airliner..... ya, right?!?!?!
The entire fairy tale about the 19 hijackers is a FARCE!
I saw the south tower ----struck by the plane------I did not look
at pictures. I did not see the pentagon struck----but I saw
the south tower take the hit. Why do you continue to make a fool of yourself??? I am not the only person who actually saw it.
fucking typical! no evidence to support that claim
Evidence as follows, the alleged use of commercial airliners as weapons given the crash sites as photographed and presented to the public as the alleged result of said attack being violations of the laws of physics if the official explanation is to be taken at face value. + the fact that there is NO accounting for the aircraft wreckage ( as has been done in the case of EVERY airliner crash since the founding of the NTSB ) The "black boxes" that is flight data recorders & cockpit voice recorders from "FLT11" & "FLT175" are totally absent, not even a fragment of a recorder to be found in any of the wreckage examined in the months post 9/11/2001.
The extreme selling job that has been done to convince people that its an entirely plausible event, that is "FLT77" crashing into the PENTAGON and 99.9% of said aircraft ending up inside the building.
Not to mention the fact that the BIG LIE has permeated the whole country to such an extent that we have "peer reviewed" papers by college professors, such that a High-school student could debunk the material in said papers, but it all goes out lending an appearance of authority to an otherwise totally unsupportable claim. for a multitude of reasons, the whole "hijacked airliners used as weapons" story is a non-starter!
in addition there are factions that argue "FLT175" must have been flown at 590 mph to strike the South Tower. You have GOT 2 B Kidding! >500 mph & <1,000 ft altitude, in a commercial airliner..... ya, right?!?!?!
The entire fairy tale about the 19 hijackers is a FARCE!
I saw the south tower ----struck by the plane------I did not look
at pictures. I did not see the pentagon struck----but I saw
the south tower take the hit. Why do you continue to make a fool of yourself??? I am not the only person who actually saw it.
Can you say with absolute certainty that what you observed was indeed a commercial airliner? and were you in a position to actually see the south wall of the south tower?
No-----I did not see the plane approach----but thousands of other people did--------what do you think it was that
hit the building resulting in a huge flash of light?------Tinkerbelle? You are making a fool of yourself