There's nothing
herculean about rigging buildings for controlled demolitions. The WTC jobs could have easily been done by a team of military-trained demo experts (not necessarily from any branch of the US military, mind you) under the cover of a reportedly legitimate elevator modernization project (for Buildings 1 and 2) and routine maintenance/repairs (for Building 7). This work would have been done at least partially in plain sight, but mainly after/before regular business hours; and any uninvolved security, maintenance, or cleaning personnel would have had no reason to give the black operators' activities a second thought.
...* plant people in air towers to falsely report 4 commercial jets had turned off their transponders and had flown off course. ...
The transponders on the legitimate flights could have been turned-off remotely by ground operator(s) who weren't
overtly affiliated with the FAA ... or by pilots who may have been in on the operation; but even if there were a handful of shills working in the flight towers, that wouldn't be so outrageous a thing for a small number of people in high places to make happen.
In accordance with the radar data provided by RADES, the shutting off of the transponders would have been crucial to the mid-flight swap-outs. Yes, the data clearly shows unidentified planes (RC drones, maybe?) converging, flying in perfect formation above or below, and then diverging from the radar tracks of reported 9/11 aircraft.
...* fake hundreds of families, pretending to grieve over lost family members.
Not necessarily. The passengers and crews from the real Flights 11 and 175 may have been off-loaded during an unscheduled stop-over and then herded (voluntarily or not) onto Flight 93. The unusually short passenger lists, for the 2 coast-to-coast flights in particular, would have served this hypothetical end very well. Since Boeing 757's have listed passenger capacities ranging from 200-295 people, Flight 93 could have easily accommodated the reported passengers and crews from Flights 11 (92 people), 175 (65 people), along with its own (40 people) for a grand total of 197 individuals (assuming that none of the Pilots or crew members were in on the operation, which may be a hasty assumption).
Of course, Flight 93 would have been remotely-piloted from take-off to crash-site, in my opinion, after having been shot down by a fighter interceptor who wasn't diverted in time; and if the pilot of that interceptor survived his debriefing, I'm sure he was encouraged in no uncertain terms to keep his mouth shut about the shoot-down.
...* fake black box recordings of hijackers.
Yeah, what a MASSIVE undertaking that would have been.
How many of those black boxes were reportedly recovered with usable sound-bites and data anyway?
...* fake phone recordings from flight #93. ...
Not a big deal in the least. People have done far stranger things under heavy duress.
The cell phone calls and the "let's roll" narrative were probably staged in the event that the RC aircraft didn't reach its intended target (Building 7).
...* paint military jets to look like commercial jets. ...
Not according to a number of eyewitnesses. Several people in good positions to see one or both of the aircraft/drones in NYC generally described the plane they saw as "a large, gray, military-looking plane" with "no emblems or logos on it".
I do believe that Flight 93 was a legitimate commercial 757 that had been modified for RC flight, primarily because its intended target would have demanded that it be flown into NYC after the "collapses" of the Twin Towers, where it almost certainly would have been caught by live television cameras from every major network in the country.
...* plant commercial jet airplane parts near crash sites.
Not where parts from the aircraft/drones were recovered.
Although, I must confess,
finding a properly painted piece of fuselage shrapnel with a conveniently intact serial number on it laying on the Pentagon's lawn was almost as fortuitous for the OTC as the pristine passport that was
found among the dust and debris in the aftermath of the "collapses" at ground zero!
In any case, if any of the prime-time cop shows are remotely realistic, planting evidence here and there is not that big a deal either.
...* fake 4 commercial jet hijackings. ...
Well, this much is certain: faking the hijackings as I've described above would have been far less
herculean for the planners and operators than the actual hijackings would have been for the alleged 19 hijackers (flying at speeds well beyond the maximum operating limits while executing enormously difficult maneuvers at altitudes that would have ripped any
standard "commercial airliner" to shreds ... were especially neat tricks).
...* plant fake news stories of Muslims learning how to fly commercial jets but not learning how to land them. ...
Why would they
had to have been faked?
It's not as though anyone would have investigated reports of some of the alleged hijackers still being alive after 9/11!
...* fake Osama bin Laden taking credit for the attack. ...
Yeah, there's
no evidence that
anything like that ever happened.
Any plan to completely "bring down" the Twins would have called for covert access to the breadth and height of the buildings' internal structural supports. The aircraft/drones were simply a cover to help explain the unprecedented totality of the sort of destruction that was planned. Minus the airplanes, the WTC's security companies would have had an awful lot of explaining to do...
