Debate Now What does MAGA mean ? Specifically ?

[lafayette]

You do Realize smith trails are dead. Fanis trail is done and Bragg's will be overturned. And Trump will be president.

Nope. They are not dead and Cannon's will be reinstated on November 7.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Nope. They are not dead and Cannon's will be reinstated on November 7.

You getting your disinformation from Russia again. Ever heard of president immunity?

 

[lafayette]

You getting your disinformation from Russia again. Ever heard of president immunity?

I know how the law works. Immunity does not apply to the state cases, and Smith's cases are based on the exceptions to the judges' findings on immunity. Your man will die in federal remandment.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I know how the law works. Immunity does not apply to the state cases, and Smith's cases are based on the exceptions to the judges' findings on immunity. Your man will die in federal remandment.

If you did you would know what it is lawfare.
And Trump is covered under presidential immunity.

 

[lafayette]

If you did you would know what it is lawfare.
And Trump is covered under presidential immunity.

You cannot even define 'lawfare.' And you don't understand that immunity is not complete. The exceptions will hang him.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You cannot even define 'lawfare.' And you don't understand that immunity is not complete. The exceptions will hang him.

I believe I have

 

[lafayette]

You getting your disinformation from Russia again. Ever heard of president immunity?

You were LEO. I was in the courts. Immunity is not absolute. He will be mince meat.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You were LEO. I was in the courts. Immunity is not absolute. He will be mince meat.

Presidential immunity is absolute if the president is in his official capacity. The only time a president is not covered would be for personal reasons

 

[lafayette]

Presidential immunity is absolute if the president is in his official capacity. The only time a president is not covered would be for personal reasons

He was not with the fraud case. He was not with docs case, which will be reinstated. The other two are up in the air if he was in his official capacity.

 

[Redfish]

Issues like this should not be dictated by the party in power or by a political candidate or by majority rule in a state.

The Government has no right to interfere in a woman’s right to have access to a safe medical procedure if she feels being forced to deliver a baby will be harmful to her right to life liberty and pursuit of happiness when an abortion causes no harm to any other born person in the world.

everyone agrees with your first sentence. the second is your opinion and that's all it is, so let's let the people of each state vote on it. Why do you fear the will of the people? Do you also agree with Kamala that the govt should pay for all abortions? if so, explain.

 

[Redfish]

He was not with the fraud case. He was not with docs case, which will be reinstated. The other two are up in the air if he was in his official capacity.

but Biden is too senile to stand trial for his classified document violations of the law?

 

[lafayette]

Ayn Rand approved of murder. I don't really take her advice on anything.

 

[lafayette]

The 'will of the people' should not override a woman's right to reproductive freedom.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

He was not with the fraud case. He was not with docs case, which will be reinstated. The other two are up in the air if he was in his official capacity.

Yes he was, the doc case gives the president supreme authority

 

[lafayette]

Yes he was, the doc case gives the president supreme authority

Not absolute, though, and that's the point here. His actions were not within the scope of his authority.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Not absolute, though, and that's the point here. His actions were not within the scope of his authority.

Yes absolute when conducting official president responsibilities. As president his actions to handle classified material was his authority and his alone. He has more authority than senator Biden did.

 

[lafayette]

Yes absolute when conducting official president responsibilities. As president his actions to handle classified material was his authority and his alone. He has more authority than senator Biden did.

You don't understand the ruling. She are on iggy to me for this thread.

 

[HikerGuy83]

What? Then he blew up the economy mishandling the Covid pandemic.

Ooops.

Well, I guess were going to let him do it again.

Suck on it.

 

[Mortis]

Just like I call Build-Back-Better a sales pitch.

It's more like "Build Back-Worse" being Biden's sales pitch. It didn't work out as planned.

MAGA is one of the best sales pitch this decade, if not, all-time!

It's the GOAT of Politics.

Done.

 

[Arlette]

I call MAGA a sales pitch. Just like I call Build-Back-Better a sales pitch.

If MAGA means Make American Great Again, it means we were once great.

Can somewhat tell me when that was, what made us "great" and when you'll know we've gotten back to that point ?

I contend that people (because I've been cornering them on this topic) don't know what they mean when they say MAGA.

Nobody I've talked to can give me specifics.

One person I talked to said:

Well, in 1960, we didn't have the illegal problem we have now. So I asked what the problem is now (in terms of numbers). Didn't have it. How about 1960...didn't have it. I decided to forego the easy follow up question and move on.

So I am going to say, I think America is great now. We have A LOT of issues, for sure. But I still love living here and am grateful for my freedoms and liberties.

I see MAGA as a sales pitch and an implication that we've lost something (but nobody can tell me what). And I am not so sure American was any greater then than it is today.

Let me know what you think.

Rule #1: Provide specifics.

Rule #2: If you want to argue generalities, you have to be very clear on what they are and the basis for them.

Rule #3: No commentary on the "other side"

We were great before Reagan