What Do You Think George Washington Would Have Thought About Mandates?

You are playing with semantics. Washington ordered his troops to be vaccinated.

WRONG!
Since vaccinations had not yet been invented for another 20 years, Washington did not even know what vaccination meant.
Washington ordered volunteer troops to be deliberately infected with smallpox.
He did not force anyone and never said a thing about vaccination.
 
The commander in chief is not mandating private citizens be vaccinated. You clowns say that ordering troiops to be vaccinated is illegal.

Derp.

Ordering troops to take mRNA injections that are pointless, is illegal, as well as being stupid.
 
Wrong.
Run the numbers.
To end the covid epidemic, you need herd immunity of 70%.
That is 240 million people who need to gain immunity.
The general lethality is about 1%, but if you only use volunteer under 40, that lethality drops by a factor of 400.
So if you take 1% you get 2.4 million, which then is divided by 400 for age, and you end up with only 6,000 dead.

The actual death total would be higher because there already were 50,000 dead, it would take time to infect that many, some elderly would still get infected, etc.
But we would have saved over 700,000 lives compared to the absurd strategy of "flattening the curve".

If there were 1-00 peoiple on the plane, and they were told 1 would die, I suspect all 100 would get off. Even at under 1 %, you are talking about hundreds of thousands dead. There is no proof that herd immunity even applies.
 
You didnt read the article, did you? It completely blows away the notion that the founding fathers were libertarians. But we get it, you like to think you're the same as Ben Franklin. You're a horror show of mental instability and anti-intellectualism.

No, you just have no idea what a Libertarian is.
Libertarians are NOT minimalists when it comes to government.
They just prefer to minimalize coercion.
They have nothing against large government operations that are not coercive, such as the FAA.
But they would be totally against the DEA.
 
No, you just have no idea what a Libertarian is.
Libertarians are NOT minimalists when it comes to government.
They just prefer to minimalize coercion.
They have nothing against large government operations that are not coercive, such as the FAA.
But they would be totally against the DEA.
Proof you didnt read the article. It refutes everything you say.
 
Wrong.
Washington forced nothing.
Enlistment was voluntary and anyone not wanted to get deliberately infected was free to leave.
And a military command in an emergency is not at all like trying to pass an unnecessary law over civilians.

Washington ordered his troops to get vaccinated. Any soldier who does not want to get vaccinated can leave as well. Civilians are not being mandated. Businesses are and they can order their employees to get vaccinated before they step on company property.
 
Mandate----"an official order or commission to do something". Nowhere in the definition of mandate is there mention of "all", "law", or "imposed". You have a very bad habit of changing reality to fit your narrative. Then again you are one of the biggest nut jobs on this site, which is saying a hell of a lot.

Wrong.
That is a definition to include things like the British Mandate for Palestine, which was an obligation the British were given for paying back the Palestinians for their help in defeating the Ottoman Empire.
It was a forced obligation, but was only half of the equation, totally leaving out the fact the contractual obligation was as repayment.
The word "mandate" has always implied a "law", "all", or "imposed".

The only other alternative to "law", "all", or "imposed" is "voluntary".
And what Washington ordered WAS voluntary.
Those who did not want to be infected with smallpox, simply resigned their commission.
But I do not think anyone did.
 
Wrong.
That is a definition to include things like the British Mandate for Palestine, which was an obligation the British were given for paying back the Palestinians for their help in defeating the Ottoman Empire.
It was a forced obligation, but was only half of the equation, totally leaving out the fact the contractual obligation was as repayment.
The word "mandate" has always implied a "law", "all", or "imposed".

The only other alternative to "law", "all", or "imposed" is "voluntary".
And what Washington ordered WAS voluntary.
Those who did not want to be infected with smallpox, simply resigned their commission.
But I do not think anyone did.
Just like what Biden wants to do......
 
He did mandate innoculations which are no different.
There is no mandate on ordinary citizens.

Washington ordered deliberate infection so that the health disaster could be deal with before the combat had made it more difficult to do.
And he did not mandate anything, because the troops were volunteers who could have just left if they disagreed.
They were not part of a career military as we have now.
And there was no choice for Washington, since it was a war situation where either way meant loss of life.

The situation now is totally different.
There is no evidence the mRNA injections work at all except as a temporary boost in antibody production.
Which would be much more effective to delay until one IS actually infected.

And yes, the attempted Biden mandates would have been on "ordinary citizens" who were at all employed by federal funds, even if they worked for private companies.
 
Washington ordered deliberate infection so that the health disaster could be deal with before the combat had made it more difficult to do.
And he did not mandate anything, because the troops were volunteers who could have just left if they disagreed.
They were not part of a career military as we have now.
And there was no choice for Washington, since it was a war situation where either way meant loss of life.

The situation now is totally different.
There is no evidence the mRNA injections work at all except as a temporary boost in antibody production.
Which would be much more effective to delay until one IS actually infected.

And yes, the attempted Biden mandates would have been on "ordinary citizens" who were at all employed by federal funds, even if they worked for private companies.
LOL

Just stop while. You'll drown slower if you stop flailing.
 
If there were 1-00 peoiple on the plane, and they were told 1 would die, I suspect all 100 would get off. Even at under 1 %, you are talking about hundreds of thousands dead. There is no proof that herd immunity even applies.

Again, the death rate for those under 40 is NOT 1%.
That is the average death rate for ALL age groups.
And covid is VERY differential based on age.
It is almost only those over 70 who are dying.
For example, of the 850,000 dead, only about 600 are under 18.

The death rate of those UNDER 40 is NOT 1%, but 0.0025%.
So if you have 100 people on the plane, and 0.0025% have to die, that mean NO ONE one that plane likely dies at all.
You would have to have 400 planes full of people with this dilemma before you would get the first single death.

The death toll from deliberate infection of covid 2 years ago, would have been less then 6,000 dead.
We killed over 100 times that number by stretching the epidemic out for over 2 years.

And YES immunity applies.
About the only pathogen where immunity does not apply is rabies.
 
Washington ordered his troops to get vaccinated. Any soldier who does not want to get vaccinated can leave as well. Civilians are not being mandated. Businesses are and they can order their employees to get vaccinated before they step on company property.

Totally wrong.
Washington did not order anyone to get vaccinated, as vaccines were not invented for another 20 some years.

Biden attempted for mandate all those receiving federal funding, including private company employees who got fed contracts.
 
There isa nothing illegal about it. You are thye stupid one.

Its illegal because it is easy to prove that mRNA injections can not get anything stored into long term T-cell memory.
All they do is get our own cells to start growing spike proteins, and since our own exosomes also have to use those same spike proteins, the immune system can NEVER trigger on these spike proteins.
 
Even if ultimately courts rule service members can have religious exemptions, I don't see what would be unconstitutional in medical discharges so long as there's no financial penalty.

A discharge is a financial penalty, but the problem is it has been proven over time that the mRNA injections simply do NOT at all work except as a temporary boost in antibody production.
They add NOTHING at all to long term T-cell memory.
 

Forum List

Back
Top