What Do You Call It When You Have Nothing?

[Billy_Kinetta]

Fred?

"When this [impeachment] process is all over, the Committee on Intelligence will continue to investigate this president from all the issues relating to the Russia investigation, including money laundering," he told MSNBC host Craig Melvin. "So I want the public to know that the investigation of this president, the desire to hold him accountable, will continue."

House Intel Committee Democrat says panel will revisit Russia investigation after impeachment

 

[JWBooth]

What Do You Call It When You Have Nothing?

Democrat campaign strategy?
Republican new ideas?

 

[kyzr]

The democrat candidates are starting to fight.
Warren wouldn't even shake Bernie's hand after the debate
Major cracks in the democrat base are widening
Nancy, and probably the super-delegates will support Biden
The Bernie voters are getting screwed again, so it looks like 2016 redux in 2020

 

[colfax_m]

It’s obvious why the Republican Senators are in such a hurry to cover this up. Meanwhile Lev provides corroboration to the Democratic allegations of Trump acting in his own personal interests in Ukraine.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

It’s obvious why the Republican Senators are in such a hurry to cover this up.

So state the obvious.

Meanwhile Lev provides corroboration to the Democratic allegations of Trump acting in his own personal interests in Ukraine.

Obviously not.

 

[kyzr]

It’s obvious why the Republican Senators are in such a hurry to cover this up. Meanwhile Lev provides corroboration to the Democratic allegations of Trump acting in his own personal interests in Ukraine.

1. Cover what up?
2. Trump's call transcript already covered "Lev's corroboration", so what?

The dems still have nothing.

 

[colfax_m]

It’s obvious why the Republican Senators are in such a hurry to cover this up. Meanwhile Lev provides corroboration to the Democratic allegations of Trump acting in his own personal interests in Ukraine.

1. Cover what up?
2. Trump's call transcript already covered "Lev's corroboration", so what?

The dems still have nothing.

We have a letter from Giuliani in his capacity as his personal lawyer asking to meet with Zelinsky to make a request.

We have Lutsenko promising Parnas information on Biden if they could get Yovanovich fired.

 

[colfax_m]

It’s obvious why the Republican Senators are in such a hurry to cover this up.

So state the obvious.

Meanwhile Lev provides corroboration to the Democratic allegations of Trump acting in his own personal interests in Ukraine.

Obviously not.

The longer this goes on, the more info comes out against Trump, the more difficult it becomes for them to ignore.

 

[Crepitus]

What Do You Call It When You Have Nothing?

Conservatism?

 

[kyzr]

It’s obvious why the Republican Senators are in such a hurry to cover this up. Meanwhile Lev provides corroboration to the Democratic allegations of Trump acting in his own personal interests in Ukraine.

1. Cover what up?
2. Trump's call transcript already covered "Lev's corroboration", so what?

The dems still have nothing.

We have a letter from Giuliani in his capacity as his personal lawyer asking to meet with Zelinsky to make a request.

We have Lutsenko promising Parnas information on Biden if they could get Yovanovich fired.

1. What is illegal about requesting a meeting with Zelensky?
2. What is illegal about obtaining oppo research? Hillary hired Russians to make the phony Steele Dossier, what's your point?

 

[there4eyeM]

"What Do You Call It When You Have Nothing?"
Having nothing to lose.

 

[colfax_m]

It’s obvious why the Republican Senators are in such a hurry to cover this up. Meanwhile Lev provides corroboration to the Democratic allegations of Trump acting in his own personal interests in Ukraine.

1. Cover what up?
2. Trump's call transcript already covered "Lev's corroboration", so what?

The dems still have nothing.

We have a letter from Giuliani in his capacity as his personal lawyer asking to meet with Zelinsky to make a request.

We have Lutsenko promising Parnas information on Biden if they could get Yovanovich fired.

1. What is illegal about requesting a meeting with Zelensky?
2. What is illegal about obtaining oppo research? Hillary hired Russians to make the phony Steele Dossier, what's your point?

Nothing illegal about requesting a meeting. But it corroborates there allegation that Trump was pursuing investigations into Biden as a personal matter. Remember when Giuliani tried to claim he was working on behalf of the State Dept? That lie is now completely blown up. Trump’s defense that he was acting in his capacity of president. That is being torn to shreds.

Nothing illegal about obtaining opposition research. It’s quite improper to use the government power vested in you to obtai. That research.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

It’s obvious why the Republican Senators are in such a hurry to cover this up. Meanwhile Lev provides corroboration to the Democratic allegations of Trump acting in his own personal interests in Ukraine.

1. Cover what up?
2. Trump's call transcript already covered "Lev's corroboration", so what?

The dems still have nothing.

We have a letter from Giuliani in his capacity as his personal lawyer asking to meet with Zelinsky to make a request.

We have Lutsenko promising Parnas information on Biden if they could get Yovanovich fired.

1. What is illegal about requesting a meeting with Zelensky?
2. What is illegal about obtaining oppo research? Hillary hired Russians to make the phony Steele Dossier, what's your point?

Nothing illegal about requesting a meeting. But it corroborates there allegation that Trump was pursuing investigations into Biden as a personal matter. Remember when Giuliani tried to claim he was working on behalf of the State Dept? That lie is now completely blown up. Trump’s defense that he was acting in his capacity of president. That is being torn to shreds.

Nothing illegal about obtaining opposition research. It’s quite improper to use the government power vested in you to obtai. That research.

Trump has no idea what the investigation would uncover. It could have exonerated Biden and made Trump look stupid. Even in a worst case scenario this is not an impeachable offense. Trump never asked anyone to lie or make up evidence. If he did then he should be impeached.