Zone1 What do Dems mean by their promises of “affordability”?

[Hafar1014]

Affordability means democrats will solve the problem they created

 

[beagle9]

I think the government has better things to do than regulate how private enterprises manage their bathrooms.



Right. Was this you?

advocate.com/news/2022/11/01/cis-woman-mistaken-transgender-records-being-berated-bathroom





Um, I've never seen anyone get completely naked in a bathroom. In fact, usually, when someone is doing their business in a bathroom, it's usually in a locked stall.

You've never seen who get totally naked in a bathroom ?

And again you are full of chit in your attempt to justify a man (disguised as a woman), being in a woman's bathroom, otherwise because in your idiotic thinking she would somehow be safe behind a locked stall in that bathroom ?? If a man (disguised as a women), was in a bathroom with her period (you dumb ace), then she could be in extreme danger if the man was up to no good, and you would have supported that because of your leftist idiocy.

 

[beagle9]

Affordability means democrats will solve the problem they created
View attachment 1213340

How convenient right ? They are master's of deception.

 

[beagle9]

Again, your whole premise is that transgender people just want to see naked lady parts...not that they identify as their chosen gender.

This is a fake moral panic to keep stupid people like you from seeing what the rich are doing to you.

You accepting the idea that a man can dress and/or act like a woman is somehow to be trusted, uhhhh is you wearing the huge dunce hat in the corner of the class room while everyone laughs at your dumb ace you dip chit..

 

[JoeB131]

You've never seen who get totally naked in a bathroom ?

That didn't even make sense as a sentence.

And again you are full of chit in your attempt to justify a man (disguised as a woman), being in a woman's bathroom, otherwise because in your idiotic thinking she would somehow be safe behind a locked stall in that bathroom ?? If a man (disguised as a women), was in a bathroom with her period (you dumb ace), then she could be in extreme danger if the man was up to no good, and you would have supported that because of your leftist idiocy.

Hey, funny thing. Gender specific bathrooms didn't become a thing until the 19th century. Before that, everyone used common privys, and it just wasn't a big deal.

Your whole premise is that transgender women are "men in disguise", and not people who think they are men. (You obviously never discuss transmasculine people using men's rooms).

This is just not a big deal.

 

[beagle9]

That didn't even make sense as a sentence.



Hey, funny thing. Gender specific bathrooms didn't become a thing until the 19th century. Before that, everyone used common privys, and it just wasn't a big deal.

Your whole premise is that transgender women are "men in disguise", and not people who think they are men. (You obviously never discuss transmasculine people using men's rooms).

This is just not a big deal.

It was a question not a sentence dipchit. Who have you not seen naked, otherwise not in their birthday suit in a bathroom ? Was it Male or female ??

Still playing dumb in the rest of your dribble I see.

 

[JoeB131]

It was a question not a sentence dipchit. Who have you not seen naked in their birthday suit in a bathroom ? Was it Male or female ??

Still playing dumb in the rest of your dribble I see.

Nope, still didn't make sense grammatically.

When I'm in a bathroom, I'm either facing the wall at the urinal, or I'm inside a closed stall dropping a duece.

Nobody gets to see me naked. Nor do I ever see anyone else naked.

 

[BackAgain]

I think the government has better things to do than regulate how private enterprises manage their bathrooms.

Again: it isn’t just bathrooms. Also, you dolt, taking your form of “logic” as the standard, then apparently you don’t believe the government should be telling any merchant that he (or she) is forbidden from denying service to customers based on race.

You simpleton empty-headed “socialists” always seem to forget the old adage that “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.”

 

[JoeB131]

Again: it isn’t just bathrooms. Also, you dolt, taking your form of “logic” as the standard, then apparently you don’t believe the government should be telling any merchant that he (or she) is forbidden from denying service to customers based on race.

You simpleton empty-headed “socialists” always seem to forget the old adage that “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.”

Well, no, not really comparable.

"I don't serve your kind here" is not, "you can use the locker room at our club, but some of our members are transgender, and you might see a dick."

There's no denial of service, just that you are being told straight up what service is at this club.

Kind of like I can't go to McDonald's and order Sushi.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

This is just not a big deal.

even if 'the right' gets its way?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Nope, still didn't make sense grammatically.

TRANSLATION: "ok, you had to have figured out by now I have no answer for that"

When I'm in a bathroom, I'm either facing the wall at the urinal, or I'm inside a closed stall dropping a duece.

does it matter to you which gender bathroom you are using? one for uno two for 'deuce'

Nobody gets to see me naked.
Nor do I ever see anyone else naked.

Houston we found the problem.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Hey, funny thing. Gender specific bathrooms didn't become a thing until the 19th century. Before that, everyone used common privys, and it just wasn't a big deal.

and who wants to go back to that?

Your whole premise is that transgender women are "men in disguise", and not people who think they are men.

no, it is a point not a premise and the point is that they are men, the rest of the 'premise' was invented by you so as to pretend you have a point.

(You obviously never discuss transmasculine people using men's rooms).

Proving the concern is not ground in transgender bias.

 

[JoeB131]

and who wants to go back to that?

Sounds like more of a cultural thing.

In Japan, they have public bathing, where Men, women and even kids share the same baths.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Sounds like more of a cultural thing.

yet you didn't see the need to mention that in your example but found it necessary to do so now.

In Japan, they have public bathing, where Men, women and even kids share the same baths.

hmmm, throw in a picture of Trump with someone of Japanese descent and you will see the folly of/in that logic.

 

[BackAgain]

Well, no, not really comparable.

"I don't serve your kind here" is not, "you can use the locker room at our club, but some of our members are transgender, and you might see a dick."

There's no denial of service, just that you are being told straight up what service is at this club.

Kind of like I can't go to McDonald's and order Sushi.

Your petty quibbles are all meaningless.

If the government can properly tell private businesses that they can’t refuse to sell products to customers of a particular race (which to some extent it can), then the government obviously can also tell a gymnasium (for example) that it is not permitted to allow biological males into the locker rooms, showers or ladies’ rooms. Exactly the same principal.

I approve of the former (within limits). I presume you do, too. I also approve of the latter. And any rational fair minded person should, too. I guess that leaves you out.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

In Japan, they have public bathing, where Men, women and even kids share the same baths.

and nowhere do you mention "transgenders", does that tell you what you are trying to tell me?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

In Japan, they have public bathing, where Men, women and even kids share the same baths.

more 19th century thinking? if not should they look to the 19th century for guidance as white liberals do here?

 

[beagle9]

Nope, still didn't make sense grammatically.

When I'm in a bathroom, I'm either facing the wall at the urinal, or I'm inside a closed stall dropping a duece.

Nobody gets to see me naked. Nor do I ever see anyone else naked.

None of that matters when it comes to you making a female uncomfortable in her private space, otherwise just because you are in the same bathroom with her, and you want her to believe that just because you squat when you pee that it's ok for you to be in there with her, uhhhh that still doesn't justify you being in there with her (you being a male), now do you understand ???

 

[beagle9]

Sounds like more of a cultural thing.

In Japan, they have public bathing, where Men, women and even kids share the same baths.

Yeah and that's why Japan got their aces whipped in WW2, and that's probably why Japan had a tsunamis that killed many thousands back in 2011.

Maybe Japan needs to re-evaluate their cultures and traditions ya think ?

 

[beagle9]

yet you didn't see the need to mention that in your example but found it necessary to do so now.

hmmm, throw in a picture of Trump with someone of Japanese descent and you will see the folly of/in that logic.

Biden would be the better picture in order to see the folly or grossness in his logic.